Dan Soloman - PBW - A Tribute to Ronnie Coleman - October 8, 2007:
"Peter, you've covered Ronnie Coleman every step of the way, In fact you've covered all of the great champions. What in your mind sets Ronnie apart from those past champions?"
Peter McGough - PBW - A Tribute to Ronnie Coleman - October 8, 2007:
"For me the best physique I've ever seen was Ronnie at the 2001 ASC. He was about 245 pounds sliced and full. He was seperated from head to toe.
You're doing the samething you say dizzy is doing (as you say). I'll use your own words to shut you up again:
"I mean where the fuck should I begin with this nonsense? lol you don't want to hear the expert opinions yet go right ahead and give your ' expert ' opinion based on less than ideal means. now seeing I wasn't there I rely on the authority of an eyewitness who was and what do they have to say about the situation."
No not quite sport , again you're clinging on for dear life to these subjective quotes that don't prove anything except how desperate you are. I'm not saying Ronnie's best isn't 2001 I think it is but to say Ronnie is unbeatable because McGough says so is fantasy period. it doesn't prove a thing because its so subjective .
I mean you're the one who is in denial McGough says its IMPOSSIBLE to choose the best , yet you don't agree with that quote , he says the best physique he's seen on-stage and the best off stage was Yates at 269 pounds yet you're very selective in what you post it shows you're scared just like the comment Ronnie would probably beat me I GUESS I DON'T KNOW
Just because McGough's opinion is Ronnie 2001 is ubbeatable doesn't mean its true , period.