Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3480963 times)

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #36500 on:** November 01, 2007, 08:49:34 PM »

Quote from: England_1 on November 01, 2007, 08:42:45 PM

This is why I think Dorian was definitely harder. Just look at the difference in the chest. Dorian's looks much, much thicker and harder.

Ronnie looks shredded and dry to the bone while Dorian looks a few weeks out from a contest.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #36501 on:** November 01, 2007, 08:53:52 PM »

Quote from: England_1 on November 01, 2007, 08:45:10 PM

Dorian's hardness in this 1995 shot is simply unbelievable. He seriously looks like a solid 260lb brick of muscle! Ronnie had better separate, but was never this hard or conditioned.

honestly, Dorian looks soft as hell in that pic compared to 01 ASC Ronnie.

England_1 · « **Reply #36502 on:** November 01, 2007, 08:58:10 PM »

Are you high on drugs? Just look at the difference in the quads, Ronnie's looks like inflated soft marshmellows, Dorian's are hard as rock. Where is Ronnie's chest in that shot? Looks gone LOL, not to mention the soft tube sock traps.

bizzy · « **Reply #36503 on:** November 01, 2007, 09:05:15 PM »

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #36504 on:** November 01, 2007, 09:06:29 PM »

Quote from: England_1 on November 01, 2007, 08:58:10 PM

Are you high on drugs? Just look at the difference in the quads, Ronnie's looks like inflated soft marshmellows, Dorian's are hard as rock. Where is Ronnie's chest in that shot? Looks gone LOL, not to mention the soft tube sock traps.

don't mistake better quad sweep for poor conditioning. Ronnie's thighs are just as defined in that pic as Dorian's. I don't even know how you gathered a tactile perception from a 2-D photograph. If I said Ronnie's quads looked "harder," you would have no way to refute my comment since you weren't there to touch his legs.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #36505 on:** November 01, 2007, 09:09:26 PM »

95 Dorian

01 ASC Ronnie

bizzy · « **Reply #36506 on:** November 01, 2007, 09:10:02 PM »

inflated soft marshmellow quads...

bizzy · « **Reply #36507 on:** November 01, 2007, 09:16:20 PM »

One more for the legs...

Shockwave · « **Reply #36508 on:** November 01, 2007, 09:28:09 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on November 01, 2007, 08:49:34 PM

Ronnie looks shredded and dry to the bone while Dorian looks a few weeks out from a contest.

Disagreed.
I see superior seperation by Ronnie while still have puffy looking muscles and watery looking skin.

England_1 · « **Reply #36509 on:** November 01, 2007, 09:59:10 PM »

Again, Ronnie's quads looking like soft marshmellow's compared to Yates. LOL. You must be blind NeoSeminole.

The Next BIG Thing! · « **Reply #36510 on:** November 01, 2007, 10:15:48 PM »

What's a marshmellow, you thick girl?

TNBT

Shockwave · « **Reply #36511 on:** November 01, 2007, 10:37:25 PM »

Quote from: The Next BIG Thing! on November 01, 2007, 10:15:48 PM

What's a marshmellow, you thick ####?

TNBT

Kinda like a Marshmallow?

bigbobs · « **Reply #36512 on:** November 01, 2007, 10:38:16 PM »

Quote from: England_1 on November 01, 2007, 08:45:10 PM

Dorian's hardness in this 1995 shot is simply unbelievable. He seriously looks like a solid 260lb brick of muscle! Ronnie had better separate, but was never this hard or conditioned.

Nasser is owning Dorian in that cover shot!

bigbobs · « **Reply #36513 on:** November 01, 2007, 10:40:01 PM »

Quote from: England_1 on November 01, 2007, 08:42:45 PM

This is why I think Dorian was definitely harder. Just look at the difference in the chest. Dorian's looks much, much thicker and harder.

Epic stressing over one bodypart, lol. For argument's sake, let's just say Dorian's chest was better than Ronnie's - in this pic you posted try comparing arms, delts, abs, etc. - Ronnie beats Dorian in all other bodyparts in this pic.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #36514 on:** November 01, 2007, 10:41:04 PM »

Quote from: England_1 on November 01, 2007, 09:59:10 PM

Again, Ronnie's quads looking like soft marshmellow's compared to Yates. LOL. You must be blind NeoSeminole.

England_1 · « **Reply #36515 on:** November 01, 2007, 10:55:21 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on November 01, 2007, 10:40:01 PM

Epic stressing over one bodypart, lol. For argument's sake, let's just say Dorian's chest was better than Ronnie's - in this pic you posted try comparing arms, delts, abs, etc. - Ronnie beats Dorian in all other bodyparts in this pic.

Get over the fact that your hero was crushed by a vastly superior bodybuilder

bigbobs · « **Reply #36516 on:** November 01, 2007, 10:59:05 PM »

Quote from: England_1 on November 01, 2007, 10:55:21 PM

Get over the fact that your hero was crushed by a vastly superior bodybuilder

At least I admit that Ronnie was better than "my hero" as you put it. On the other hand, you're a guy who will never admit that Ronnie was better than Dorian no matter how many obvious comparison pics are shown to you.

Andre Nickatina · « **Reply #36517 on:** November 01, 2007, 11:08:40 PM »

Andre Nickatina · « **Reply #36518 on:** November 01, 2007, 11:10:16 PM »

Quote from: Andre Nickatina on November 01, 2007, 11:08:40 PM

.l

ol

Quote from: Andre Nickatina on November 01, 2007, 11:08:40 PM

.l

ol

England_1 · « **Reply #36519 on:** November 01, 2007, 11:15:22 PM »

Quote from: bigbobs on November 01, 2007, 10:59:05 PM

At least I admit that Ronnie was better than "my hero" as you put it. On the other hand, you're a guy who will never admit that Ronnie was better than Dorian no matter how many obvious comparison pics are shown to you.

Many bodybuilders were better than your hero. Even a 215lb Wheeler beats El Nobody, LOL.

Andre Nickatina · « **Reply #36520 on:** November 01, 2007, 11:20:02 PM »

Quote from: England_1 on November 01, 2007, 11:15:22 PM

Many bodybuilders were better than your hero. Even a 215lb Wheeler beats El Nobody, LOL.

author=England_1 link=topic=69359.msg2503215#msg2503215 date=1193984122]
Many bodybuilders were better than your hero. Even a 215lb Wheeler beats El Nobody, LOL.

[/quote]author=England_1 link=topic=69359.msg2503215#msg2503215 date=1193984122]
Many bodybuilders were better than your hero. Even a 215lb Wheeler beats El Nobody, LOL.

[/quote]author=England_1 link=topic=69359.msg2503215#msg2503215 date=1193984122]
Many bodybuilders were better than your hero. Even a 215lb Wheeler beats El Nobody, LOL.

[/quote]author=England_1 link=topic=69359.msg2503215#msg2503215 date=1193984122]
Many bodybuilders were better than your hero. Even a 215lb Wheeler beats El Nobody, LOL.

[/quote]author=England_1 link=topic=69359.msg2503215#msg2503215 date=1193984122]
Many bodybuilders were better than your hero. Even a 215lb Wheeler beats El Nobody, LOL.

[/quote]

bigbobs · « **Reply #36521 on:** November 01, 2007, 11:45:34 PM »

Quote from: England_1 on November 01, 2007, 11:15:22 PM

Many bodybuilders were better than your hero. Even a 215lb Wheeler beats El Nobody, LOL.

Nope, overall only Ronnie was

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #36522 on:** November 02, 2007, 10:16:50 AM »

Quote from: England_1 on November 01, 2007, 09:59:10 PM

Again, Ronnie's quads looking like soft marshmellow's compared to Yates. LOL. You must be blind NeoSeminole.

LOL, sure

Necrosis · « **Reply #36523 on:** November 02, 2007, 01:14:00 PM »

MY god ronnie is anihilating dorian in that MM, not to mention that ronnie would dwarf him at 287, and looks twice as diced, lol. no comparison what so ever.

Hulkster · « **Reply #36524 on:** November 02, 2007, 02:21:49 PM »

Quote from: usmokepole on November 02, 2007, 01:14:00 PM

MY god ronnie is anihilating dorian in that MM, not to mention that ronnie would dwarf him at 287, and looks twice as diced, lol. no comparison what so ever.

there never even HAS been a comparison.
thats the point.

its only the three idiots on this thread that think dorian is better.

and thats because they don't know how to evaluate a physique properly.
$:-\$