Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Hulkster]

"Hey Ben! are we supposed to be clapping?"

 

[suckmymuscle]

I said "bullshyt" not "bullsyte" learn to read moron.

  The problem is, you fucking retard, that "bullshyt" is still not English. Nice way to own yourself there, Einstein.

Ronnie ASC 01 is the best physique onstage. I know they judge you on stage, not in a gym wearing black socks. Here is your quote you made before, moron:
"I'm sorry, but the sentence: "Ronnie would be unbeatable" leaves the question mark of whether McGough was refering to all bodybuilders who ever stepped onstage or only to Dexter Jackson, Gunther, Cutler, Baddel, etc, and the other guys who were competing with him at his time."

"He said that Ronnie would be unbeatable, but like I said, this is open to interpretation of whether he was refering only to the guys he was competing against or to all bodybuilders who ever stepped onstage. So stop making up lies to prove you case."

See how dumb you are? This is not open for interpretation of whether he was refering only to the guys he was competing against. Peter was talking about All-Time period, nimrod. Not just with guys he is competing with.

I post quotes in plain english. If you can't read, that's your problem. I don't (try to explain what others mean) like you do dumb a$$. LOL, and your calling me dumb? Get a life Mr. Incompetent.

  Wrong. The quote from McGough states that Ronnie at the 2001 ASC was the best physique he ever saw at a stage, but that Dorian's physique in those pics from Kevin Horton was a contender for best ever. I know that physiques are judged onstage, you moron, which is why McGough especifically mentions that version of Dorian's physique was not officially in the running. Get a clue, retard.

[suckmymuscle]

but as we can cleary see, he would get blown off the stage by a 'petite' Ronnie:

  Mass is a very important component of the judging criteria. Remember all those Coleman spooge-suckers who claim that Ronnie in his 2003 form would defeat Dorian 1995 on mass alone, even though Dorian 1995 is harder and has less symmetrical flaws. Between Ronnie 2001 ASC and Dorian 1997, Dorian's huge advantage in size could tip the scales in his favor.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[IceCold]

but as we can cleary see, he would get blown off the stage by a 'petite' Ronnie:

if that were any way true, then ronnie would have done better competing at 260 lbs., like in 96 and 97, than he did.

but of course, it isnt..

[Hulkster]

. Between Ronnie 2001 ASC and Dorian 1997, Dorian's huge advantage in size could tip the scales in his favor.

 wow. one of the dumbest lines of the whole 1500 page thread right here folks..

 


you guys really have no clue how this sport is judged, do you? Do you think that Fux should have been Mr. O? after all, he and dorian 97 looked almost the same..very low quality physiques overall.

honestly. just when I think you guys cannot come up with anything more stupid, you surprise me yet again.

congratulations!

[Hulkster]

LOL yeah, dorian's mass could tip the scales in his favor...

you guys need to take up knitting or something.

this sport is just too complicated for ya.

sorry.

[England_1]

Sorry, but Ronnie would look SMALL compared to a 1997 Yates. Just look at the Ronnie in 1997 when he was 260. He looked positively SKINNY compared to the big boys.

[Hulkster]

if bodybuilding was only about size, Lou ferrigno would have won the 93 olympia.

but it is only one factor of many.

and ronnie was not 260 pounds in 97.

he was not bigger in 96/97 than he was in 99. Nor was he bigger in 97 than dorian was in 93.

that much is obvious.

look at the difference in Quad mass ALONE in ronnie 99 compared to Ronnie 97:

just because a magazine makes a typo, does not mean it must be true.

especially when Helen Keller can cleary see that Ronnie was a lot bigger in 99 than he was in 97:

[Hulkster]

notice the visible increase in size in quad mass in 99 ronnie vs 97 ronnie.

he was not lighter in 99 than he was in 97 folks.

I hope no one is stupid enough to believe that.

[England_1]

roughly the same as 99, shitty proportions and UGLY.

[bizzy]

Dorian in 1997 would be a complete mess compared
to Ronnie in 1999 but I want to give Dorian his due
per England's request last night.

Dorian had some of the best calves ever.
He set a new standard for conditioned size in 1993.
He had incredible detail in his back with size to go with it.
He had great side tricep, ab and thighs, front and rear lat
poses.

[England_1]

Hulkster, I find it unlikely you will ever give Yates the respect he deserves. He did a lot for the sport and many will argue that his 1993 performance is one of the greatest ever with Arnold in 1974 and Ronnie in 1998. Why can you not even acknowledge this?

[Hulkster]

Hulkster, I find it unlikely you will ever give Yates the respect he deserves. He did a lot for the sport and many will argue that his 1993 performance is one of the greatest ever with Arnold in 1974 and Ronnie in 1998. Why can you not even acknowledge this?

what you don't understand is that what dorian did or did not do for this sport or for bodybuilding in England has NOTHING to do with this thread.

this thead is about evaluating phyisiques. period.

based on that. even in 93, dorian would lose to 99 Ronnie. there is mountains of visual evidence and eyewitness testimony all about these pages.

the problem is, nuthuggers , like sucky just did, still insist that dorian even in his 97 shape would still beat ronnie at his best.

which is completely stupid.

period.

[suckmymuscle]

.the problem is, nuthuggers , like sucky just did, still insist that dorian even in his 97 shape would still beat ronnie at his best.

  Nooooooooooooooooooooo.. .I never said that! I said that Dorian 1997 would overwhelm the 2001 ASC Ronnie for size, that's it. I never said that he would absolutely defeat Ronnie in that shape. I personally believe that Ronnie at the 1998 and 1999 Olympias is better than Dorian 1997, but my point is that judges are addicted to size as long as the conditioning is there - and you can protest all you want, but the bottom line is that Dorian 1997 was still very hard -, so there's a chance that Dorian 1997 would prevail.

which is completely stupid.

  Not as stupid as you saying that Ronnie's calves are more separated than Dorian's. That takes the cake. And I'm not even getting into the claims of other Ronnie spooge-suckers.

SUCKMYMUSCLE


[/quote]

[Hulkster]

Not as stupid as you saying that Ronnie's calves are more separated than Dorian's. That takes the cake. 

well, if I were you I would re-think that statement:

remember: we are talking about strictly seperation here.

not shape or size:

[Hulkster]

wow. dorian's calves are not nearly as detailed and separated..

they still blow ronnie's out of the water.

but the statement that you made fun of is totally true:

[Hulkster]

sucky got owned. yet again

[suckmymuscle]

sucky got owned. yet again

`

  Lol...the word "again" implies that there it happEned before, which is didn't. As for your calves comment, it is too stupid to merit a response.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[bizzy]

Man,

Ronnie was ripped in 99..
I'm gonna buy a DVD burner just so I can
transfer some of my older vids to DVD and
find some screencaps from 99 that are unreal;
in addition to the ones that are already out there.
Ron's calves wern't to shabby when he was lighter...   

[bigbobs]

what you don't understand is that what dorian did or did not do for this sport or for bodybuilding in England has NOTHING to do with this thread.

this thead is about evaluating phyisiques. period.

based on that. even in 93, dorian would lose to 99 Ronnie. there is mountains of visual evidence and eyewitness testimony all about these pages.

the problem is, nuthuggers , like sucky just did, still insist that dorian even in his 97 shape would still beat ronnie at his best.

which is completely stupid.

period.

LOL.  Hulkster I think the fact that Dorian did lots for bodybuilding in England proves that his physique was better than anyone else's including Ronnie's 

[Hulkster]

`

  Lol...the word "again" implies that there it happEned before, which is didn't. As for your calves comment, it is too stupid to merit a response.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

stupid? really?

looks like you are caught avoiding what is right in front of you.

 

we all can see it.

why can't you?

[Iceman1981]

 The problem is, you fucking retard, that "bullshyt" is still not English. Nice way to own yourself there, Einstein.

  Wrong. The quote from McGough states that Ronnie at the 2001 ASC was the best physique he ever saw at a stage, but that Dorian's physique in those pics from Kevin Horton was a contender for best ever. I know that physiques are judged onstage, you moron, which is why McGough especifically mentions that version of Dorian's physique was not officially in the running. Get a clue, retard.

 

"YOU ARE A MORON"

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Read it and remember it.

The fact is, you can't read and you're trying to back peddle.

Here is your quote you made before, moron:

"I'm sorry, but the sentence: "Ronnie would be unbeatable" leaves the question mark of whether McGough was refering to all bodybuilders who ever stepped onstage or only to Dexter Jackson, Gunther, Cutler, Baddel, etc, and the other guys who were competing with him at his time."

"He said that Ronnie would be unbeatable, but like I said, this is open to interpretation of whether he was refering only to the guys he was competing against or to all bodybuilders who ever stepped onstage. So stop making up lies to prove you case."

LOL, it can't get more stupid than that. LOL. ^^^^^^^^^^^^

[qiniz]

do you guys lose sleep over this shit?

[pumpster]

Man,

Ronnie was ripped in 99..
I'm gonna buy a DVD burner just so I can
transfer some of my older vids to DVD and
find some screencaps from 99 that are unreal;
in addition to the ones that are already out there.
Ron's calves wern't to shabby when he was lighter...   

Agreed on all counts; any time someone claims that Yates had the edge in conditioning i just post this shot. Coleman was far more ripped than Yates, Yates slightly drier and denser.

Same on calves; ya at a lighter weight with the thighs smaller the calves weren't bad at all.

[pumpster]

LOL.  Hulkster I think the fact that Dorian did lots for bodybuilding in England proves that his physique was better than anyone else's including Ronnie's 

Doing a lot for BB in england proves what? LOL