Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[m8]

Should we expect anything less of you....of course you wouldn't give Yates credit, even where he deserves it. That rear lat spread of Yates in 1995 is simply unbeatable. The legs are complete, with huge calves and, rock hard quads. The midsection is tight and detailed. Nasser really wasn't even in close here. 1997 yes, 95 no.

Of course, the above statement is also coming from a guy who claims Flex was the 2nd greatest BB of the 90s. Odd considering he only came into 1 Olympia in good shape. The rest were either consequences of his own diet failure, crashing his "whip" at 170mph, or ninja attacks 

So Levrone looked better than Dorian from the back too?   

[NeoSeminole]

The funny thing is, eventhough Coleman was 25lbs heavier, his back was actually less thick and smaller than Yates The traps on Yates are massive. Most of the mass Ronnie gained from 99 to 2003 was in the quads and that's about it. Plus, his condition really wasn't near as good as 98.

ha ha ha, what bullshit. First of all, Ronnie was over 30 lbs heavier. He weighed 287 lbs at the 03 Mr. Olympia while Dorian weighed 255 lbs at the 95 Mr. Olympia. Second, Ronnie's back was much bigger than Dorian's. Kevin is holding his own with Dorian in the width department, and Ronnie makes Kevin look small. Here's a shot of Kevin standing next to Dorian and Ronnie when both weighed approximately the same (roughly 260 lbs).





Ronnie gained almost 30 lbs more from the 99 British GP to the 03 Mr. Olympia, which means his back would be even larger. It would be no contest. Third, Ronnie has better definition in his glutes and hamstrings. This negates any advantage Dorian may of had in conditioning since the purpose of conditioning is to display better definition.

[pumpster]

Game, set & match **yawn**

[Hulkster]

then explain why in every contest yates got the loudest ovation than anyone on stage.

are those people watching the show live all wrong?

you are too stupid to realize that the level of ovation does not correlate directly with physique quality.

see Markus Ruhl, Mike Matarazzo and a hundred million other people.

 

man, I am glad I don't go through life being as dumb as you guys.

it must be tough.

[Hulkster]

see the above pics.

things are MUCh different when you post the worst pics you can find vs. decent pics.

bullshit.

show me a 'decent' shot of a dorian arms clasped most muscular pose

LOL you will never find one because his arms and quads are garbage from the front.

most nationals competitors look better in that pose or any most muscular for that matter LOL

[Hulkster]

In all those pics Nasser looks better LOL

yeah, thats what is so funny (and sad and stupid at the same time)

these idiots have no clue what they are talking about LOL

 

[Hulkster]

This negates any advantage Dorian may of had in conditioning since the purpose of conditioning is to display better definition.
 
 
 

you mean like this?!?

 

[pumpster]

The construction worker being massacred...LOL

[Hulkster]

yeah, we can  clearly see how much better conditioned dorian was than 1999 Ronnie Coleman...

LMAO

 

no fucking clue.

none.

zilch.

nil

nada.

 

[Hulkster]

ps do you think ND will ignore real life and post a quote again?

LOL

 

[England_1]

The difference in clavicle width here is truly outstanding...Dorian makes Kevin his little b*tch 

[Hulkster]

speaking of being made to look like a little Bitch, see: Ronnie owning dorian badly LOL

[Hulkster]

which one is dorian? LOL

[BillyGuns]

Coleman in his off season...bulked to 635 lbs. Creatine is some amazing stuff, nothing a good ECA stack won't take care of.

[Hulkster]

that must be dorian standing beside him? LOL

[THE MUSCULAR]

WOW
OMG !!!   i like that picture of RONNIE most muscular ... the most sick picture i have ever seen !!! its really amazing . mine blowing !!

i wish i have that picture in large size ?
can u send me one HULKSTER if u have and if u dont mind

[IceCold]

you are too stupid to realize that the level of ovation does not correlate directly with physique quality.

see Markus Ruhl, Mike Matarazzo and a hundred million other people.

 

man, I am glad I don't go through life being as dumb as you guys.

it must be tough.

not necessarily.

if ruhl (like the challenge round in 04) and matarazzo were in the last round, they would not have gotten the same ovation as the more deserving winners.

for instance, no one thought that ruhl in 04 should have beaten ronnie, hence the appropriate reception from the crowd.

different story with yates in the posedown.

owned as usual.

[IceCold]

the rolls of loose skin on his lower back is a major flaw

but having terrilbe calves isnt.


 

[IceCold]

since when was levrone EVER wider than yates.


 

[IceCold]

Ronnie gained almost 30 lbs more from the 99 British GP to the 03 Mr. Olympia, which means his back would be even larger. It would be no contest. Third, Ronnie has better definition in his glutes and hamstrings. This negates any advantage Dorian may of had in conditioning since the purpose of conditioning is to display better definition.

wrong on all accounts.

to prove your wrong look at the 99 ronnie and the 03 ronnie.

notice how much better ronnie's back in 99 is that 03

how much lighter was ronnie?  a good 30 lbs.

that proves you wrong about ronnie in 03 having any advantange over dorian despite ronnie being heavier.

eve the 03 ronnie would loose to ronnie in 99. 

[IceCold]

ps do you think ND will ignore real life and post a quote again?

LOL

 

when you stop using photoshop pics (which the whole board knows you do) and thinking you know more than anyone in bbing including horton, mcgough, ronnie, etc.





LOL

[NeoSeminole]

wrong on all accounts. to prove your wrong look at the 99 ronnie and the 03 ronnie. notice how much better ronnie's back in 99 is that 03

that proves you wrong about ronnie in 03 having any advantange over dorian despite ronnie being heavier.

suuure.

[sculpture]

The 2003 rendition does lose some of the etched in detail of earleir years in the pursuit of size.

However, theres just somethin about the 287lb ronnie thats mind blowing. Physically so dominant that year he literally made other competitors look like children.

At that weight he outmassed everyone and his conditioning was superb however he lost a little quality and detail aswell as symmetry particularly his quad calf imbalance became more pronounced.

Probably his third best showing behind 98 and 99.

[IceCold]

suuure.

are you saying that ronnie's back in 03 was better than it was in 99?

[NeoSeminole]

are you saying that ronnie's back in 03 was better than it was in 99?

I was talking about Ronnie's back looking much bigger in 03 than 99. You responded with:

"wrong on all accounts. to prove your wrong look at the 99 ronnie and the 03 ronnie."

so either you have reading comprehension problems or you forgot what we were talking about.