PUMPSTER, WHERE IS YOUR RESONSEPUMPSTER
in your infinite wisdom, please help us out.
since you are a top IFBB judge, please explain to us the judging criteria? if size and conditioning dont matter, please inform us as to what does matter.
is the olympia really just a biceps contest?
also, please explain the politcs surrounding yates' victories considering that he lives in england and has vritually zero mainstream appeal in the US and what was so 'political' about him winning.
if he was as bad as some people on this board claim. yes, i am not lying. some people actually consider him not to be a good bodybuilder, why was he Mr. Olympia. i dont see the point in 'giving' him the title every year if he was so bad. why yates? just to generate controversy and interest?
doesnt make much sense. but since you are a top IFBB judge, i'm sure you'll let us know the truth.
lastly, please explain to us the UNIMPORTANCE of keeping score cards. i thought that bbing shows are judged and the winner has the lowest score. but people on this board, yes this very board, discredit the scores/numbers saying they have no importance.
i'm confused. if they have no importance, then why bother with the score sheets anyways.
are the 'real' winners really just based on getbig members opinions? despite the fact that a certain bber beat the other best bbers of all time in a completly dominating fashion. does that count for anything?
pumpster,
thanks for clearing all of this up for us at getbig. with your years as a top IFBB judge (i mean to call yates and haney tier b olympians, you must really know something that WE ALL dont and have years and years judging the absolute highest bbing shows), I'm sure many answers will be answered.
thanks, pumpster, we all appreciate it.
