Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NeoSeminole]

pathetic and tragedic.


dorian still never looked this bad.

Oh please, Ronnie isn't even fully flexing in that pic.

[IceCold]

and dorian is???


dorian looks better anyways.  at least he is in shape. 

[NeoSeminole]

He has twig arms in that pic.

Here's what twig arms look like.

[IceCold]

Here's what twig arms look like.

holy shit. look at that fucking back!!!!

and the pic is still just scanned from a mag. 

[IceCold]

Here's what twig arms look like.




yep, twig arms.

[RocketSwitch625]

holy shit. look at that fucking back!!!!

and the pic is still just scanned from a mag. 

Coleman's back never looked as good as that. And those arms are in proportion with everything else.

[IceCold]

throught this entire thread, hulkster and pumpster have used pics of dorian that have been scanned from magazines that are 12 years old.

they refuse to use pics of better quality to truly provide a fair argument and point to the pics of shitty quality in their own arguments.

notice the differencen between these pics and the pics hulkster and pumpster use.

however, all the pics i've been using comparison to coleman have been of digital quality, not scanned from an issue of FLEX from 1995, and are all the most recent pics available.

you cant say the same. 

[NeoSeminole]

Dorian's twig arms look pathetic in that last pic.

[pumpster]

ronnie has never been as dry and hard as this with this much density.

The delusion continues, is amplified when any rationale like dryness can be used to excuse this mess. He looks like he'd be hard-pressed to beat the new version of Kovaks. 

[RocketSwitch625]

Dorian's twig arms look pathetic in that last pic.

No they don't. It's called proportion. Look it up on dictionary.com.

[pumpster]

since you are a top IFBB judge, please explain to us the judging criteria?  if size and conditioning dont matter, please inform us as to what does matter. 

is the olympia really just a biceps contest?

Only you would reduce it to biceps-just because Coleman's got arguably the best bis ever doesn't mean the rest of him wasn't similar-unlike Yates he didn't have those glaring imbalances you keep overlooking in your obsession with hardness.

Judging criteria: Sergio's "judging" as well as Schwarzenegger's comments mid-90s that you clearly never saw completely agree with my assessments.

To reiterate, from Oliva:

"Yates: no arms & the belly of a cow". hahahahahahahahahahahaah ahahah

[pumpster]

No they don't. It's called proportion

His arms were always a problem, everyone knows it. He had no biceps size; even the tris were cut but nowhere near big enough for the overpowering torso.

That size problem's aside from the almost total lack of definition, cuts or arm refinement in front shots. Junior league.

[RocketSwitch625]

His arms were always a problem, everyone knows it. He had no biceps size; even the tris were cut but nowhere near big enough for the overpowering torso.

That size problem's aside from the almost total lack of definition, cuts or arm refinement in front shots. Junior league.

Yates pwns Coleman in that shot. I have that picture signed by Dorian and it looks much better than your shitty scan. 'Nuff said.

[NeoSeminole]

No they don't. It's called proportion. Look it up on dictionary.com.

ha ha ha, how can Dorian be balanced if he has one of the widest backs of all time with a pair of twig arms?

[IceCold]

Only you would reduce it to biceps-just because Coleman's got arguably the best bis ever doesn't mean the rest of him wasn't similar-unlike Yates he didn't have those glaring imbalances you keep overlooking in your obsession with hardness.

Judging criteria: Sergio's "judging" as well as Schwarzenegger's comments mid-90s that you clearly never saw completely agree with my assessments.

To reiterate, from Oliva:

"Yates: no arms & the belly of a cow". hahahahahahahahahahahaah ahahah

who gives a shit what sergio says.

[IceCold]

PUMPSTER WHERE IS YOUR RESPONSE


PUMPSTER

in your infinite wisdom, please help us out. 

since you are a top IFBB judge, please explain to us the judging criteria?  if size and conditioning dont matter, please inform us as to what does matter. 

is the olympia really just a biceps contest? 

also, please explain the politcs surrounding yates' victories considering that he lives in england and has vritually zero mainstream appeal in the US and what was so 'political' about him winning. 

if he was as bad as some people on this board claim.  yes, i am not lying. some people actually consider him not to be a good bodybuilder, why was he Mr. Olympia.  i dont see the point in 'giving' him the title every year if he was so bad.  why yates?  just to generate controversy and interest?

doesnt make much sense.  but since you are a top IFBB judge, i'm sure you'll let us know the truth. 

lastly, please explain to us the UNIMPORTANCE of keeping score cards.  i thought that bbing shows are judged and the winner has the lowest score.  but people on this board, yes this very board, discredit the scores/numbers saying they have no importance.

i'm confused.  if they have no importance, then why bother with the score sheets anyways. 

are the 'real' winners really just based on getbig members opinions?  despite the fact that a certain bber beat the other best bbers of all time in a completly dominating fashion.  does that count for anything?

pumpster,

thanks for clearing all of this up for us at getbig.  with your years as a top IFBB judge (i mean to call yates and haney tier b olympians, you must really know something that WE ALL dont and have years and years judging the absolute highest bbing shows), I'm sure many answers will be answered. 

thanks, pumpster, we all appreciate it.

[NeoSeminole]

who gives a shit what sergio says.

tell that to ND and Sucky. They listen to what Paul Dillet says like the gospel.

[RocketSwitch625]

Some of my signed Dorian Yates photos.

[RocketSwitch625]

who gives a shit what sergio says.

Sergio will like Coleman even more now that he'll never retire undefeated.

[Hulkster]

Yates pwns Coleman in that shot. I have that picture signed by Dorian and it looks much better than your shitty scan. 'Nuff said.

 I bet your pic is all sticky.

so that is what it is reduced to now? bad scans?

And I suppose all the shots with Yates arms and legs looking piss poor from the front are all merely an artifact of a bad photo?

I guess that means Ronnie must look EVEN BETTER than he already does, since there are lots of bad shot of him and he kills Yates in "almost every department" as mentioned.

[Hulkster]

smooth arms and legs resulting from a bad scan?

I think not.

[Jr. Yates]

Some of my signed Dorian Yates photos.

Love the second pic, November 1993 issue (i think) of Flex featured dorian's one year transformation and that pic was one of them, unbelivable.

[NarcissisticDeity]

I bet your pic is all sticky.

so that is what it is reduced to now? bad scans?

And I suppose all the shots with Yates arms and legs looking piss poor from the front are all merely an artifact of a bad photo?

I guess that means Ronnie must look EVEN BETTER than he already does, since there are lots of bad shot of him and he kills Yates in "almost every department" as mentioned.

Yates owns Ronnie in the side chest , side triceps , abdominal & thigh front & rear latspread these are the poses Dorian outclasses Ronnie he can stand toe-to-toe with Ronnie in the back double biceps and Ronnie has the better front double biceps shot .

[RocketSwitch625]

I bet your pic is all sticky.

Not as sticky the close up shots you have of Coleman pulling his posing trunks up his ass crack on your bedroom wall.

[NarcissisticDeity]

smooth arms and legs resulting from a bad scan?

I think not.

His arms aren't smooth and neither are his quads , the ONLY problem with Yates quads are with his uppersepeartion which is oddly shaped , hypocritically its okay for Ronnie to win with his missing and very much smooth calves but Yates its a travisty lol Hulkster you need to keep working on your game .