Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3524811 times)

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #300 on:** May 07, 2006, 01:29:01 PM »

Even at his absolute worse he still beat Ronnie Coleman , imagine if he was at his best ? lol

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #301 on:** May 07, 2006, 01:50:19 PM »

Yet another pic, which puts Dorian's preter-human density and dryness into clear perspective. Ronnie, who...?

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #302 on:** May 07, 2006, 02:22:18 PM »

At 310 lbs, on the peak of the off-season, the width, thickness and density of Dorian's latissimus dorsi muscles was phenomenal.

Ronnie can't even touch it...

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Hulkster · « **Reply #303 on:** May 07, 2006, 02:38:52 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on May 07, 2006, 12:57:49 PM

Sukster, if you're not blown away by Yates' density and dryness in this picture, then you're a retard. Coleman never looked this hard. Ever.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

you are saying that the Yates most muscular you posted is harder than this:

or these:

Look at that detail and vascularity! ronnie looked harder than Dorian ever did.

Oh, and by the way:

dorian getting owned

even the most biased yates supporters have to acknowledge that their hero NEVER had a back that looked this good overall and in all these shots.

Hulkster · « **Reply #304 on:** May 07, 2006, 02:40:25 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on May 07, 2006, 02:22:18 PM

At 310 lbs, on the peak of the off-season, the width, thickness and density of Dorian's latissimus dorsi muscles was phenomenal. Ronnie can't even touch it...

SUCKMYMUSCLE

MORPHED!!

Hulkster · « **Reply #305 on:** May 07, 2006, 03:27:14 PM »

LOL you guys are saying that Dorian is hard in that pic?

Where's the detail in his quads?
Where's the detail in his delts?
Where's the detail in his arms?

the Myth lives on.

the only part of dorian that was hard was his lower back.

the rest of him looked soft compared to guys like Flex and Ronnie.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #306 on:** May 07, 2006, 04:01:46 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on May 07, 2006, 03:27:14 PM

LOL you guys are saying that Dorian is hard in that pic?

Where's the detail in his quads?
Where's the detail in his delts?
Where's the detail in his arms?

the Myth lives on.

the only part of dorian that was hard was his lower back.

the rest of him looked soft compared to guys like Flex and Ronnie.

Oh so you're standing by your claim that Dorian's hardness was a myth? lol Oh please tell me you are , you had the common sense to retract that statement before and now you're trying to use that again? quote Peter McGough " Yates has skin like tissue paper " you think you know better than Peter McGough? this picture is the epitome of size & hardness

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #307 on:** May 07, 2006, 04:06:21 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on May 07, 2006, 02:40:25 PM

MORPHED!!

This isn't

and its still insane .

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #308 on:** May 07, 2006, 04:17:13 PM »

Shredded from the front & Back

sculpture · « **Reply #309 on:** May 07, 2006, 04:20:10 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on May 07, 2006, 02:22:18 PM

At 310 lbs, on the peak of the off-season, the width, thickness and density of Dorian's latissimus dorsi muscles was phenomenal. Ronnie can't even touch it...

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Seriously you have zero credibility, no intelligence and your post is meaningless shit when you use morped pics old son.

Oliver Klaushof · « **Reply #310 on:** May 07, 2006, 04:22:48 PM »

This shot is just.......amazing. Expecially for a man that size. What did McHammer say? "Can't touch this."

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #311 on:** May 07, 2006, 04:25:54 PM »

He only has detail & hardness in his lowerback huh ? peep these pics , notice the guy on the left is hard as nails and the guy on the right isn't !! look at the difference in the detail between the two , when you say Yates' has no detail in his upper back you just make zero sense . oh and how about the detail in this pic? and hardness? and completeness and balance & proportion.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #312 on:** May 07, 2006, 04:28:30 PM »

Yates' back is just absurd it really is .

WOOO · « **Reply #313 on:** May 07, 2006, 04:39:05 PM »

when was this truce going to start?

Hulkster · « **Reply #314 on:** May 07, 2006, 05:09:05 PM »

None of those back shots of yates compare to the 99 Grand Prix shots. That was a level of deep, etched muscle (complete with BICEPS) that Dorian could not match.

Hulkster · « **Reply #315 on:** May 07, 2006, 05:13:42 PM »

Hey Dorian freaks, ya know that most muscular you were orgasming over?

well, here is Ronnie:

AT 300 POUNDS with more HARDNESS than Dorian EVER had from the front!!

Ha ha - owned yet again!

LuciusFox · « **Reply #316 on:** May 07, 2006, 05:29:43 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on May 07, 2006, 04:25:54 PM

He only has detail & hardness in his lowerback huh ? peep these pics , notice the guy on the left is hard as nails and the guy on the right isn't !! look at the difference in the detail between the two , when you say Yates' has no detail in his upper back you just make zero sense . oh and how about the detail in this pic? and hardness? and completeness and balance & proportion.

Dorian looks like a construction worker

Hulkster · « **Reply #317 on:** May 07, 2006, 05:42:15 PM »

Quote from: LuciusFox on May 07, 2006, 05:29:43 PM

Dorian looks like a construction worker

with a wide waist

Hulkster · « **Reply #318 on:** May 07, 2006, 05:48:17 PM »

Ronnie at 301 pounds...

dorian at some lesser bodyweight that is supposed to make him harder, but doesn't because he lacks the detail even when he shows up in shape, LOL

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #319 on:** May 07, 2006, 06:00:22 PM »

Quote from: sculpture on May 07, 2006, 04:20:10 PM

Seriously you have zero credibility, no intelligence and your post is meaningless shit when you use morped pics old son.

The picture is legit, bumbass. As for the intelligence commentary, I just find it entertaining coming from you.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #320 on:** May 07, 2006, 06:02:01 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on May 07, 2006, 03:27:14 PM

LOL you guys are saying that Dorian is hard in that pic?

Where's the detail in his quads?
Where's the detail in his delts?
Where's the detail in his arms?

the Myth lives on.

the only part of dorian that was hard was his lower back.

the rest of him looked soft compared to guys like Flex and Ronnie.

Dorian might be soft in that picture...but only when compared to your skull. It's harder than granite.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #321 on:** May 07, 2006, 06:05:29 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on May 07, 2006, 02:38:52 PM

you are saying that the Yates most muscular you posted is harder than this:

or these:

Look at that detail and vascularity! ronnie looked harder than Dorian ever did.

Oh, and by the way:

dorian getting owned

even the most biased yates supporters have to acknowledge that their hero NEVER had a back that looked this good overall and in all these shots.

No, it's not harder: it's MUCH harder. Really, there's no comparison! I was efering to Dorian's superhuman density and dryness, not the amount of details. But yes, he does have superb striations on this pic as well.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

LuciusFox · « **Reply #322 on:** May 07, 2006, 06:08:44 PM »

Quote from: suckmymuscle on May 07, 2006, 06:02:01 PM

Dorian might be soft in that picture...but only when compared to your skull. It's harder than granite.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Ronnie has so much more detail than Dorian. Dorian looks like one of the Village People

hillbilly · « **Reply #323 on:** May 07, 2006, 06:11:01 PM »

Quote from: LuciusFox on May 07, 2006, 06:08:44 PM

Ronnie has so much more detail than Dorian. Dorian looks like one of the Village People

hmmmm but which one

phyxsius · « **Reply #324 on:** May 07, 2006, 06:17:02 PM »

Quote from: hillbilly on May 07, 2006, 06:11:01 PM

hmmmm but which one

I think the new seventh member