what about the front?
Dorian was dryer in the christmass tree and abs.
Ronnie was dryer in the quads, delts, triceps (striated), glutes, hams, biceps (split), pecs.
And you are going to still tell me that dorian was harder? 
Absolutely Dorian was harder , genius for the umpteenth-time striations are
GENETIC hence why not all bodybuilders have them and why guys like Andres Munzer had a lot more than Coleman ever did , Dorian had striations in his lowerlats & his christmas tree was shredded like a 188lb Samir Bannout even though he was 257lbs , Dorian had striated glutes , " wow not as many as Ronnie do that means Ronnie was dryer " I know where you're going and its nonsense , he still had them , Dorian's whole midsection was shredded , his intercostals & obliques were ripped to ribbons , and abs were awesome , especially for a man of his weight , you keep insisting because Dorian's upperquad seperation is oddly shapped or overdeveloped ( pick one ) means he has no cuts in his quads , once again nonsense , his lower quads were cut & clear , his upperquads tend to look too big and don't have great seperation like Arnold or Samir but it doesn't mean they're holding water , and his satorious muscle ( thigh-rod ) was cut in the likes Coleman's never were , Dorian has great hamstrings and great ham/glute tie-ins , maybe not as sharp as Colemans but he wasn't holding water back there , his triceps look like they were carved out of marble !! no striations ( genetic ) but in no way lacking , his chest ( which you think is a flaw ) is awesome , not as great as Haneys ( then agains whos is? ) his chest was striated and full , the sign of a weak chest is when you raise your arms above your head it disappears , not the case with Dorian , check the ab-thigh , in 1991 one of the things Dorian thought Haney had a clear advantage on him was chest thickness and by 1993 Dorian's chest was a lot better than in 91 , biceps Ronnie has the superior biceps bar none !! it doesn't mean Dorian was holding water in his , calves no contest Dorian has the superior calves bar none !! Dorian's delts were shredded and cut its hard to see it in some pics because of the lighting , look at the pic of him doing the backdouble bicep shot with the green background you can clearly see how dry his delts are in fact his whole back , I wish I knew what contest that was from , I would love to see more pics from that series , anyway part of the reason why people go on about Dorian's hardnes is because a man his size never ( up until that point ) stepped on stage weighing 257lbs and been that dry , Haney was 257lbs before I believe in 1989 and he himself said his conditioning suffered for it , he came in a lot bigger ( and less sharper ) than he wanted , but from a size & conditioning standpoint Dorian set the bar , Now I'm saying Ronnie may hav equalled Dorian in this respect at a slightly lower bodyweight ,like when Ronnie was 249lbs at the 1998 Mr Olympia but in my opinion he hasn't equalled it at the same weight , Ronnie was 257lbs at the 1999 Mr Olympia and Dorian was the same at the 1993 and Dorian has the edge on him , Peter McGough said Ronnie wasn't as sharp in 99 as he was in 98 and keep in mind Dorian is an inch shorter so the extra 8 pounds he had over a 1998 Ronnie would make a difference , but I digress Ronnie may have matched Dorian on dryness at 249lbs but hasn't surpassed him , its 2006 and people still talk about how grainy & dry Yates was .
