I do find it more than a little strange that that particular pic is the ONLY good shot of Dorian's back double bi.
Almost all the rest are shitty - and yet you go on about how hard he was.
Well, guess what:
most of the time he apparently was not hard enough to display really good upper back detail.
Again you're outright wrong , wrong on the topic of his hardness , even at his worse he has an xmas tree and striated glutes , and you can clearly see his detail but in some shots its hard to see because of the lighting , he has fair skin and under harsh lighting it can get washed out , his back detail has always been there , in some pics of the 1993 Olympia its hard to see , but watch the video its clearly there , Ronnie himself said Dorian has the freakiest back he ever seen and Samir ( who had a great back ) said Dorian's was better Ronnies , you can't argue with Two Mr Olympias
Lets break down Dorian's back , you say it lack upper detail , I say you're gravely mistaken on this one , look at the pic , his back is , wide , thick , seperated , and balanced , you can clearly see Dorian's lats insert near his waist , they are thick & wide and his lower lats are striated , his lowerback is striated beyond belief for a man his size , you can clearly see where his lats are seperated from the teres major & infraspinatus and you can clearly see the seperation bweteen the teres major & infraspintus and traps , while on the topic of traps , Yates must have the thickest damn traps of anyone his weight and some beyond !! its much easier to see this detail in black bodybuilders and ones of Mederterian decent , who tan well , but for you to say he has no detail is just plain wrong!!
Look at the pic with Nasser so you can have a gather at what a back with no detail looks like for future refference .
