Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NarcissisticDeity]

no he didn't. It only appeared that way when your quads and back are huge:

pencils

[LuciusFox]

pencils

  Those aren't pencils, you delirious fool

[pumpster]

Piano mover straining mightily to hold gut in..

[pumpster]

And OUUUUUUUTTTTT....

Not morphed.

[Hulkster]

and to think, an ironager prefers the top pic over the bottom one

[LuciusFox]

and to think, an ironager prefers the top pic over the bottom one

  Dorian has a nasty physique, and I don't mean that in a good way

[NarcissisticDeity]

and to think, an ironager prefers the top pic over the bottom one

No I prefer this pic over that one !!  

[NarcissisticDeity]

Oh yes Mr-Aesthetic 2004 lol his phsyique is very pleasing to eye , Bob Paris eat your heart out .

[LuciusFox]

No I prefer this pic over that one !!  

 Why don't you post a full body pic

[NarcissisticDeity]

Why don't you post a full body pic

lol that picture is indictive of Yates whole appearnce and Ronnie is getting owned very badly by get this a 228lb Dorian Yates and Ronnie is 287lbs , a 59lb weight advantage and ho-hum big deal lost of size mediocre conditioning , perfect example of quality vs quantity .

[Hulkster]

No I prefer this pic over that one !!  

ronnie is NOT EVEN FLEXING YET IN THAT SHOT

see what I mean about the retarded ironagers and their ridiculous comparisons?


still much better than anything Dorian ever produced.

And I know you are going to jump back with a lower back pic.

but guess what: its ONLY the lower back.

That shot of Ronnie is the ENTIRE back. 

[LuciusFox]

lol that picture is indictive of Yates whole appearnce and Ronnie is getting owned very badly by get this a 228lb Dorian Yates and Ronnie is 287lbs , a 59lb weight advantage and ho-hum big deal lost of size mediocre conditioning , perfect example of quality vs quantity .

  And a lighter Ronnie has Dorian on detail and aesthetics. Stand them next to each other and Dorian would have looked like a child.

[nicorulez]

ND, Dorian is more ripped but Ronnie is way bigger.  His lats are wider and thicker, his delts and arms are thicker.  However, I have to admit that this particular Dorian was amazing.  He had shape, size and cuts.    If Dorian would have continued to look like this, I would have no problem with his physique whatsoever.  He was the definite man in 1992 and 1993 (Hear that Suckylackthereofmuscles).  However, I don't believe that pic could have come from after 1995.  If it did, why didn't he bring that to the Mr. Olympia than the ill-forgetten mess he became.  Now that Dorian against a 1999 Ronnie would have been fun;  still think Ronnie takes him but Dorian was incredible there.  When was that pic taken ND?

[Hulkster]

that pic was taken when Dorian was practically 12.

He never brought anything close to that in the upper back department to a Mr. Olympia stage.

Another reason why Ronnie would have destroyed him.

[NarcissisticDeity]

This back shot obliterates any Coleman back shot you can come up with , period end of sentence , Dorian's back is unmatched period , Ronnie 2003 may have been wider , but no where near as dry , 1998 he have have been just as dry but his lats don't insert as low as Dorian's his thickness is not in the same leauge , Dorian's lower lats & X-mas tree waste ANY version of Coleman you can concieve , Ronnie may come close in 1999 however his back was NOT as dry , and take into consideration the whole pose , the only advantage Coleman has is much better biceps , he cannout match this pose , from the full diamond shaped calves to the ripped hams to the striated glutes , to the best back ever , to the balance & proportion , I'm sorry sport its may be close at times but overall he can't deal with this shot .

[LuciusFox]

This back shot obliterates any Coleman back shot you can come up with , period end of sentence , Dorian's back is unmatched period , Ronnie 2003 may have been wider , but no where near as dry , 1998 he have have been just as dry but his lats don't insert as low as Dorian's his thickness is not in the same leauge , Dorian's lower lats & X-mas tree waste ANY version of Coleman you can concieve , Ronnie may come close in 1999 however his back was NOT as dry , and take into consideration the whole pose , the only advantage Coleman has is much better biceps , he cannout match this pose , from the full diamond shaped calves to the ripped hams to the striated glutes , to the best back ever , to the balance & proportion , I'm sorry sport its may be close at times but overall he can't deal with this shot .

 You are delirious and practically every point you made has been refuted. Ronnie has a thicker and more detailed  back, more cut glutes and hams, better arms and shoulders and just kills Dorian in the rear double bi.

[alexxx]

This back shot obliterates any Coleman back shot you can come up with , period end of sentence , Dorian's back is unmatched period , Ronnie 2003 may have been wider , but no where near as dry , 1998 he have have been just as dry but his lats don't insert as low as Dorian's his thickness is not in the same leauge , Dorian's lower lats & X-mas tree waste ANY version of Coleman you can concieve , Ronnie may come close in 1999 however his back was NOT as dry , and take into consideration the whole pose , the only advantage Coleman has is much better biceps , he cannout match this pose , from the full diamond shaped calves to the ripped hams to the striated glutes , to the best back ever , to the balance & proportion , I'm sorry sport its may be close at times but overall he can't deal with this shot .

Thanks stella.

[pumpster]

Game, set & match: COLEMAN..

[NarcissisticDeity]

Game, set & match: COLEMAN..

Wow I never head that before " game set match " ya think you could be a little more original? then again I shouldn't expect that much of you !! and Yates is just wasting Ronnie in that pic !!

[LuciusFox]

Wow I never head that before " game set match " ya think you could be a little more original? then again I shouldn't expect that much of you !! and Yates is just wasting Ronnie in that pic !!

 Are you daft? Yates's back looks small in that pic and his twig arms don't help.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Are you daft? Yates's back looks small in that pic and his twig arms don't help.

Ronnie himself already conceded Dorian had the freakiest back he ever seen , so you may want to take it up with him .

[Hulkster]

Ronnie himself already conceded Dorian had the freakiest back he ever seen , so you may want to take it up with him .

ronnie can't see his own back.

[LuciusFox]

Ronnie himself already conceded Dorian had the freakiest back he ever seen , so you may want to take it up with him .

  Ronnie is too humble to mention his own back, not to mention that he said that in past tense.

[NarcissisticDeity]

ronnie can't see his own back.

A losers sentiment !!  

[NarcissisticDeity]

  Ronnie is too humble to mention his own back, not to mention that he said that in past tense.

Ronnie conceded that his back his great , Dorian's is just that better .