He makes some valid points , you however , post the same pic over & over and make dumb remarks , try an articulate your opinion if you can !! 
Hardly. Points 1 - 5 are largely irrelevant as proven countless times in this thread and many others.
6 is pointless conjecture as ronnie at his peak never stood next to dorian and clearly suckmy is basing his opinion on sets of photos that are never fairly shot nor under identical lighting conditions.
7. This is true but nobody ever argued against dorians "etchiness", hardness and dryness. These were his strengths. Of course suckmy ignores ronnies strengths in this point.
8. By his reasoning ronnie has better chest, bis, tris, delts, teres minor (how suckmy can judge this muscle is beyond me), supraspinatus, quads and hamstrings. Quite a compelling list.
Therefore on closer inspection, the post yields nothing other than points that were never argued.