Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NarcissisticDeity]

What is incredibly stupid about this debate is that both of you people are posting the same ol' pics of them not even flexing, in a relaxed state of being. Especially you, ND. Do you have nothing better to do than troll sites looking for poses where ronnie is relaxed, in offseason, or simply NOT posing?

But damn, those most muscular's of Ronnie own every fucking bodybuilder on the planet. Who is Yates to even compete with that...

Oh please Camp-Coleman started with the ' bad pics ' and I played their game , but his most muscular is impressive but I've seen better .

[healthiswealth]

Oh please Camp-Coleman started with the ' bad pics ' and I played their game , but his most muscular is impressive but I've seen better .

um...you just posted 1/2 of the upper body in an attempt to prove that Sergrio's MM is better...are you beginning to see the stupidity of your posts and arguments? Its good to fight in what you believe in and all, but sometimes pride can get the best of you. I mean, you are so desperate to be heard, that you start to create incredibly stupid opinions which make complete logical sense to you. I remember when you argued that Arnold had better quads than Coleman. And that time when you said that Dorian's arms were superior. Seriously, get a grip on reality, dude 

[pumpster]

you just posted 1/2 of the upper body in an attempt to prove that Sergrio's MM is better...are you beginning to see the stupidity of your posts and arguments?

PATHETIC, as in yet another desperate tangent taken only for the sake of debate, with no logic. Long ago he reduced himself to nothing more than babbling..

I have a feeling this nerd was part of high school debating teams and luved the attention..the issues at hand are basically irrelevant as long as the debate is perpetrated. blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah..

Sergio's MM is great but not better than Ron's. WTF has he got to do with it other than providing yet ANOTHER reminder of why Yates was tier-B?

[NarcissisticDeity]

um...you just posted 1/2 of the upper body in an attempt to prove that Sergrio's MM is better...are you beginning to see the stupidity of your posts and arguments? Its good to fight in what you believe in and all, but sometimes pride can get the best of you. I mean, you are so desperate to be heard, that you start to create incredibly stupid opinions which make complete logical sense to you. I remember when you argued that Arnold had better quads than Coleman. And that time when you said that Dorian's arms were superior. Seriously, get a grip on reality, dude 

Oh I see my opinion's are not based in reality? so Sergio isn't real? and I can't have the opinion that Sergio looks better than Ronnie in the most muscular? and if I do its stupid? lol I'll tell you what stupid is , stupid is thinking because my opinion doesn't match the majority it is therefore stupid or invalid , and sure Ronnie has some advantages that Sergio does not but in my opinion I think Sergio looks better , despite being much lighter , here are a few more of his whole body , now if you don't agree that Sergio looks better , okay , but to say its stupid of me to think so , shows who is ignorant 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Again

[NarcissisticDeity]

PATHETIC, as in yet another desperate tangent taken only for the sake of debate, with no logic. Long ago he reduced himself to nothing more than babbling..

I have a feeling this nerd was part of high school debating teams and luved the attention..the issues at hand are basically irrelevant as long as the debate is perpetrated. blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah..

Sergio's MM is great but not better than Ron's. WTF has he got to do with it other than providing yet ANOTHER reminder of why Yates was tier-B?

Yates was never a B-tier Pro as you say , he was an top-tier Pro from his first contest , he never placed below second in his whole career !! in comparison Ronnie who placed 11th in his first Pro show , and 16th in his first Olympia , thats bottom of the barrel D-teir Pro !!

[alexxx]

lol those fools think anybody got anything on Sergio 

[NarcissisticDeity]

 In some shots Ronnie looks better than Dorian in the most muscular and in some shots he doesn't , around the same bodyweight I think Dorian looks better and when Ronnie is heavier he does , but good thing you post most musculars of Ronnie above the knee lol

[NarcissisticDeity]

See how much an awesome paris of calves add to the shot ?

[NarcissisticDeity]

Again

[NarcissisticDeity]

Dorian again

[brian36]

you are obsessed with calves.

[pumpster]

Another brilliant choice-your pic reaffirms Ron's dominance over your bitch.

ND's calf obsession (he's a leg man): calves are somewhere between serratus & obliques in the heirachy, along with forearms-important, but..

[suckmymuscle]

You dick you keep proving Ron's dominance. Bend over and take it like a turd..

  So you compare a most muscular where Dorian is 242 lbs, to one where Ronnie is 287 lbs and you think you have proven anything, bitch? It goes to show you have criteria. Too bad Ronnie had a belly like Santa in that most muscular. Oh, and terrible structural symmetry.

  Posting pics of Ronnie at 280+ lbs is pointless, because we all know he looks like he has a chest-burster at that weight. And don't forget that Dorian defeated several 280+ lbs bodybuilders who look BETTER than Ronnie at that weight(better symmetry, taper, flow of muscle bellies. Ex:Jean-Pierre Fux, Dillet, Aaron Baker). At the ideal 250+ lbs range, Dorian is so much better that there's no comparison. He would EASILY defeat Ronnie...as in fact he did, several times.

  Now, "pumpster"(your username reveals why you make so many gay insinuations: you probably know a lot about it), follow my suggestion and remove Ronnie's dick from off your throat for a minute, so that some oxygen can reach your brain and allow you to think beter and to see the truth.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[NarcissisticDeity]

Another brilliant choice-your pic reaffirms Ron's dominance over your bitch.

ND's calf obsession (he's a leg man): calves are somewhere between serratus & obliques in the heirachy, along with forearms-important, but..

Wow your bitch lol how elloquint and calves are an very important muscle and I'll tell you why , calves can be seen from every single angle and they balance out the lower leg , you can't hide poor calves , now if the shoe was on th other foot , you guys would be going on about how great calves are , these are the same people who cheer for Ronnie's overdeveloped gigantic ass and use the logic " well the glutes are a muscle and they should be developed to thier maximum " so should calves ! and Ronnie's calves while at times are big ( when he's 300lbs ) they have poor shape , and development and are no where near in balance with his quads , so in the overall scheme of things they're extremly important .

[freeagain]

for the love of the sweet baby jesus ... WILL YOU PLEASE STOP!!

its so simple.... dorian is the better bodybuilder cuz he handed ronnie his ass on every head to head...... and ronnie has took the 'mass game ' to a new level cuz its now another era! the next mr0 will eclipse ronnie too .. ad infinitum

END OF F'UCKIN ARGUMENT !!

[NarcissisticDeity]

  So you compare a most muscular where Dorian is 242 lbs, to one where Ronnie is 287 lbs and you think you have proven anything, bitch? It goes to show you have criteria. Too bad Ronnie had a belly like Santa in that most muscular. Oh, and terrible structural symmetry.

  Posting pics of Ronnie at 280+ lbs is pointless, because we all know he looks like he has a chest-burster at that weight. And don't forget that Dorian defeated several 280+ lbs bodybuilders who look BETTER than Ronnie at that weight(better symmetry, taper, flow of muscle bellies. Ex:Jean-Pierre Fux, Dillet, Aaron Baker). At the ideal 250+ lbs range, Dorian is so much better that there's no comparison. He would EASILY defeat Ronnie...as in fact he did, several times.

  Now, "pumpster"(your username reveals why you make so many gay insinuations: you probably know a lot about it), follow my suggestion and remove Ronnie's dick from off your throat for a minute, so that some oxygen can reach your brain and allow you to think beter and to see the truth.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Again he makes a great point , Camp-Coleman love post to pics of a 240lb Dorian to a 300lbs Ronnie and say " look your boy is getting owned " lol great logic  

And suckmymuscle makes another great point at anything above 250lbs Ronnie's phsyique falls apart , show me a pic of a 265lbs Ronnie with a razor sharp midsection , with clearly defined serattus/intercostales/obliques , and above 250lbs his overall condition isn't great , sure his glutes are striated but he still carries water in the rest of his phsyique and his balance & proportion above 250lbs goes to hell , it wasn't fantastic to begin with but it looked better at 250lbs than at anything above that .

And again Camp-Coleman with the myth Dorian never faced anyone bigger than him , Fux was 280lbs , Nasser was 275lbs , Ian Harrison was 280lbs , Lou Ferigno 317lbs , Dillet 275lbs , I don't think Baker was that big , but he was huge , anyway Dorian beat them all .

[NarcissisticDeity]

for the love of the sweet baby jesus ... WILL YOU PLEASE STOP!!

its so simple.... dorian is the better bodybuilder cuz he handed ronnie his ass on every head to head...... and ronnie has took the 'mass game ' to a new level cuz its now another era! the next mr0 will eclipse ronnie too .. ad infinitum

END OF F'UCKIN ARGUMENT !!

Great post !!

[natural al]

Wow your bitch lol how elloquint and calves are an very important muscle and I'll tell you why , calves can be seen from every single angle and they balance out the lower leg , you can't hide poor calves , now if the shoe was on th other foot , you guys would be going on about how great calves are , these are the same people who cheer for Ronnie's overdeveloped gigantic ass and use the logic " well the glutes are a muscle and they should be developed to thier maximum " so should calves ! and Ronnie's calves while at times are big ( when he's 300lbs ) they have poor shape , and development and are no where near in balance with his quads , so in the overall scheme of things they're extremly important .

dorians calfs look sick in that shot...

[pumpster]

So you compare a most muscular where Dorian is 242 lbs, to one where Ronnie is 287 lbs and you think you have proven anything

Only nerds are fascinated by trivia involving bodyweight comparisons.

Did anyone complain in the 70s when Schwarzenegger beat Columbu with a huge bodyweight advantage?

Irrelevant. I smell GED with these two..

[FREAKgeek]

The most muscular was won by Ronnie. The only weak retort Camp Yates can conjure up is the gut in the most muscular. You can't even notice the gut, look at all the pics posted. LOL Then ND, in a vain attempt, pulls out Sergio Oliva out of nowhere to help save grace. LOLOLOL

And then there's the whole Dorian beat Coleman pre 98 a bunch of times. They are forgetting the fact that Ronnie had unprecedented gains in 98 and onward. I shouldn't even need to type that.

[NarcissisticDeity]

The most muscular was won by Ronnie. The only weak retort Camp Yates can conjure up is the gut in the most muscular. You can't even notice the gut, look at all the pics posted. LOL Then ND, in a vain attempt, pulls out Sergio Oliva out of nowhere to help save grace. LOLOLOL

And then there's whole Dorian beat Coleman pre 98 a bunch of times. They are forgetting the fact that Ronnie had unprecedented gains in 98 and onward. I shouldn't even need to type that.

Oh you can't notice the gut or his calves lol unprecedented gains in 1998? in what reguads ? size ? he was the same weight he was in 1996/97 , the only area he imroved on was his dryness , which helped his overall appearence , 1999 he was bigger 257lbs however his dryness suffered , and after that his dryness was never as good as it was in 98 , 2003 he made everyone look small , he bar far passed Dorian size wise , but as far as size wise plus condition he didn't surpass Yates .

[sculpture]

Oh you can't notice the gut or his calves lol unprecedented gains in 1998? in what reguads ? size ? he was the same weight he was in 1996/97 , the only area he imroved on was his dryness , which helped his overall appearence , 1999 he was bigger 257lbs however his dryness suffered , and after that his dryness was never as good as it was in 98 , 2003 he made everyone look small , he bar far passed Dorian size wise , but as far as size wise plus condition he didn't surpass Yates .

Yawn yawn yawn. When will you stop posting this drivel. Dredge up numbers all you want but the photos don't lie. The only area of improvement is dryness. Are you for real?

Coleman of 98 and 99 is light years beyond his form of 96.

Everyone, and i truly mean everyone can see this EXCEPT YOU.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Yawn yawn yawn. When will you stop posting this drivel. Dredge up numbers all you want but the photos don't lie. The only area of improvement is dryness. Are you for real?

Coleman of 98 and 99 is light years beyond his form of 96.

Everyone, and i truly mean everyone can see this EXCEPT YOU.

Lightyears huh? in what reguards? answer me besides dryness which helped his overall appearence what else was there? he was the same weight , the same demensions , so please tell me other than his crisp muscularity due to his excellent hardness was he light years beyond on?

[hillbilly]

I think Dorian at his best looked better than Ronnie ever has!

but becus of injury like the torn biceps and his expanding midsection (at its worst was far bigger than Ronnies) Dorian didnt look that good for that long. Ronnie is more consistant but taken on a best look basis i go with Dorian.