Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3525292 times)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2750 on: May 31, 2006, 11:43:13 PM »
no no no no no.

ND say dorian has a great taper and had great balance and proprotion ::)

Great proportion (in bodybuilding) means having a great X-frame.

Dorian does not (compared to other pros) - I know ND will probably post some pic of yates standing solo and orgasm over it, but the facts are that bodybuildnig is judged solely on the basis of how you look in relation to your fellow competitors..

And lat spreads do not show this since they are misleading in terms of waist size..

Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2751 on: May 31, 2006, 11:45:52 PM »
First of all the pics you posted are from 1997 correct? lol Dorian beat that , so much for that and look at that back shot , mismatched parts , giant arms , smaller delts , thinner forearms , great sweapt quads and matchsticks for calves , Hulkster you simply don't know what balance & proportion are I'm sorry , you just don't !! and Coleman is not as wide structually as Dillet , the only edge Ronnie has is back detail & thickness , Dillet is a pure genetic freak coupled with being a muscular freak without a compromise of aesthetics and balance & proportion .

I belive those pics were taken just prior to the 1998 Olympia (for Ronnie's first video if I recall).

so, no, dorian did not ever face this version of Ronnie.
Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2752 on: June 01, 2006, 12:03:20 AM »

Ronnie from the 1995 Olympia.

For all that ND goes on about how good Ronnie looked in the mid nineties, he looks like utter shit compared to the 1999 video.
Flower Boy Ran Away

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2544
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2753 on: June 01, 2006, 12:53:00 AM »
Guys i say we stop engaging in this dance with ND. He's not getting it. I can't believe anyone in their right mind would think this looks good.  ???

[img]

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2544
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2754 on: June 01, 2006, 12:53:48 AM »
A little better perhaps.

A telling example of just how poor yates can look when conmpared to other bbers

[img]

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83365
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2755 on: June 01, 2006, 01:32:50 AM »

Ronnie from the 1995 Olympia.

For all that ND goes on about how good Ronnie looked in the mid nineties, he looks like utter shit compared to the 1999 video.

No wrong again not midneighties , late ninties , in fact 1996/1997 he was 250lbs  ;) you know when Dorian beat him , you know the guy in this pic

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83365
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2756 on: June 01, 2006, 01:36:46 AM »
Guys i say we stop engaging in this dance with ND. He's not getting it. I can't believe anyone in their right mind would think this looks good.  ???

[img]


See this is wher you go astray , its not a matter of what I think looks good , its a matter of what the judges think !! and in this contest the judges gave that 2nd place .

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2544
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2757 on: June 01, 2006, 01:42:09 AM »
So you do think that looks good?

We've posted countless non flattering, frankly appaling pictures of yates and you've stood there and praised them.

You see wide obliqes.

Every one else sees poor quads, hanging arms, wide waist, poor taper, no detail, no striations, box like aesthetics, barrel chest.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83365
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2758 on: June 01, 2006, 01:57:16 AM »
A little better perhaps.

A telling example of just how poor yates can look when conmpared to other bbers

[img]


You post a picture of a guy by himself as an example of just how poor Yates can look when compared to other bodybuilders? lol am I missing somthing here? where's the joke? and ontop of it , you post a picture of a guy that never beat Dorian when they competed onstage pleanty of times , can you be this dumb? I would have to say yes

The problem with you Coleman fans is , you cannot seperate your own personal prefferences and bias from facts , the fact is 1993 Dorian Yates is no pushover  , he was 257lbs hard as steel and balanced , he dominated among the best competitors in bodybuilding history , just because you can't figure out why he was so good , doesn't mean that he wasn't , so hypothetcially if a 1993 Dorian and a 199- whatever Coleman met , a few things would be clear , Ronnie wouldn't have no day at the park , the contest may be close but in my opinion Dorian would best Ronnie , now seeing I'm an intelligent man , I'm willing to entertain the judges may like Ronnie's package better , and choose him , but in all probability it would be Yates , so thats the difference between me and Camp-Coleman , they think Ronnie would dominate Dorian and thats laughable , it would be an easy win lol statements like this show your bias and your outright lack of understanding and sevre underestimation of just how great Dorian Yates was , so you'll need a little more that hero-worship and conjecture to beat me or Dorian !!  ;)

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2759 on: June 01, 2006, 02:10:56 AM »
According to your logic he has 0 Olympias, so he's no good.. ???

  Oh, but I thought you hate numbers! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2760 on: June 01, 2006, 02:19:30 AM »
That rear lat spread is absurd. Truly the best example to date of such a pose.

As for his back double bi, all is see is heavy weight arms, no calves and too big an ass. ;)

Poor pose for ronnie. Not good at all.

  Wrong! THIS is the best rear lat spread ever! ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2761 on: June 01, 2006, 02:24:28 AM »
  the bes abs-and-thighs in the history of the sport. :o Show me a single pic where ronnie looks half as good. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2762 on: June 01, 2006, 02:31:20 AM »
  Ronnie Coleman: the master-taper! :D ;D ::)

SUCKMYMUSCLE


suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2763 on: June 01, 2006, 02:37:03 AM »
  Dorian replies to a question made to him by Peter McGough, a few months before the 97 O, about who he thinks would be able to de-throne him:

  "I don't want to sound arrogant, but if all the other guys were to come into the contest in their best shapes ever, and I were to beneath my best, not only would I still win, but there would be a fair distance between myself anf whoever finishes second." :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o ;)

  THE MAN!!!!!!

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2764 on: June 01, 2006, 02:40:22 AM »
  On the challenge presented by a 285 lbs Nasser El Sonbaty:

  "Give Nasser the front double biceps pose; he's very good at it. But he can't even touch me on the other six mandatories." :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :D

  THE MAN!!!!!!!

SUCKMYMUSCLE

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2765 on: June 01, 2006, 02:48:17 AM »
  On Shawn Ray's claim to Dorian having poor symmetry and that Ray should have won in 94 and 96.

  "Shawn always presents himself as the symmetrical ideal. As far as I'm concerned, he does have good symmetry as far as his muscles go, but he's lacking in structure in that he has narrow shoulders, short legs and a long waist. To me, symmetry is about balance: not only of the muscles, but also of the the skeletal structure. Personally, I find the long-waisted look with stumpish legs to be very unaesthetic. Shawn has that look and so does Nasser." :o :o :o :o :o :o :o :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\(poor Shawn)

  "Shawn's claims of having won the 94 and 96 Os are not even worth addressing. I carry 55 lbs more of lean mass than him, with a superior structure. And even though his conditioning is among the best, he stil can't match me for dryness." ::)(poor Shawn)

  THE MAN!!!!

SUCKMYMUSCLE

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2544
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2766 on: June 01, 2006, 02:50:26 AM »
ND's thoughful yet flawed critique is lost amongst a torrent of pointless and repeated posts by none other than suckmy.

ND you ask if your missing something. Where do we start? Logic, reasoning, objectvity, non bias. You post admittedly a better yates pic than the one i did but its still god awful with cinder block aesethetics, weak arms, abs as thick as his scrunched up chest, wide waist. When will thee comprehend this?

As for levrone not beating yates on stage. Well yes the sport is littered with catastrophes, one of which is how kev never beat pork yates, but competitve history shouldnt render such comparsions pointless, otherwise how come you find its fine to post a pic of dillet as some sort of attempt to further denigrate ronnie. Again as highlighted previously, its your obsession with numbers that drives such inanity.

Its similar to yor accepting flex magazine as some sort of dogma. You extoll peter mcgough for making statements such as yates being the best ever, and you believe this automatically qualifies and validates your argument. "Well if peter says so, i must be right and you wrong".

It doesnt. Like you say its all opinion. Only you feel yours is more worthy than the rest of the members here.

Run back to your magazines.

Bear

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1602
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2767 on: June 01, 2006, 02:54:45 AM »
Coleman is not as wide structually as Dillet , the only edge Ronnie has is back detail & thickness , Dillet is a pure genetic freak

freeagain

  • Time Out
  • Getbig IV
  • *
  • Posts: 2004
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2768 on: June 01, 2006, 02:55:41 AM »
i have watched all of dorian's olympias.. and he murders em all onstage.

you dont seem to realise.. dorian had to dominate cuz he was an english champion .. and you just KNOW the judges were lookin to dethrone him ... but it wasnt to be... dillet looked f'uckin shit compared to dorian .. those still pics you have of dillet dont tell 1/10 of the story.

ronnie is just a big soft turd in comparison.  ;D

watch the 96 olympia .. when doz is pwnin the fuck out of all em .. and he wernt at his best.

dorian was such a phenom he made all over competitors look off season.


Bear

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1602
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2769 on: June 01, 2006, 02:56:08 AM »
two things kept Paul from winning everything , back thickness & detail ,

Bear

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1602
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2770 on: June 01, 2006, 02:57:21 AM »
note ND's self-nullifying pro-Yates/Anti-Coleman arguments above.

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2544
  • Getbig!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2771 on: June 01, 2006, 03:07:33 AM »
Don't worry i caught it. Again, we've witnessed this before

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2772 on: June 01, 2006, 03:55:54 AM »
ND's thoughful yet flawed critique is lost amongst a torrent of pointless and repeated posts by none other than suckmy.

ND you ask if your missing something. Where do we start? Logic, reasoning, objectvity, non bias. You post admittedly a better yates pic than the one i did but its still god awful with cinder block aesethetics, weak arms, abs as thick as his scrunched up chest, wide waist. When will thee comprehend this?

As for levrone not beating yates on stage. Well yes the sport is littered with catastrophes, one of which is how kev never beat pork yates, but competitve history shouldnt render such comparsions pointless, otherwise how come you find its fine to post a pic of dillet as some sort of attempt to further denigrate ronnie. Again as highlighted previously, its your obsession with numbers that drives such inanity.

Its similar to yor accepting flex magazine as some sort of dogma. You extoll peter mcgough for making statements such as yates being the best ever, and you believe this automatically qualifies and validates your argument. "Well if peter says so, i must be right and you wrong".

It doesnt. Like you say its all opinion. Only you feel yours is more worthy than the rest of the members here.

Run back to your magazines.

  Ugh :-\...you're such a moron. All the posts are different dumbass. You're only saying this because the only thing you read was the "the man!" statement at the end ::). Dumb cun t.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83365
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2773 on: June 01, 2006, 05:55:29 AM »
ND's thoughful yet flawed critique is lost amongst a torrent of pointless and repeated posts by none other than suckmy.

ND you ask if your missing something. Where do we start? Logic, reasoning, objectvity, non bias. You post admittedly a better yates pic than the one i did but its still god awful with cinder block aesethetics, weak arms, abs as thick as his scrunched up chest, wide waist. When will thee comprehend this?

As for levrone not beating yates on stage. Well yes the sport is littered with catastrophes, one of which is how kev never beat pork yates, but competitve history shouldnt render such comparsions pointless, otherwise how come you find its fine to post a pic of dillet as some sort of attempt to further denigrate ronnie. Again as highlighted previously, its your obsession with numbers that drives such inanity.

Its similar to yor accepting flex magazine as some sort of dogma. You extoll peter mcgough for making statements such as yates being the best ever, and you believe this automatically qualifies and validates your argument. "Well if peter says so, i must be right and you wrong".

It doesnt. Like you say its all opinion. Only you feel yours is more worthy than the rest of the members here.

Run back to your magazines.

My critique is far from flawed , it's on point and nonbiased , something that can't be said about Camp-Coleman , I'm not a huge fan of Dorian's phsyique , I wouldn't want to look like him , I was routing for Flex Wheeler in 1993 , I think he looked great at the begining of career and towards the end he didn't , this is exactly why I can be unbiased , the lot of you are obsessed with Ronnie to the point of denile of Yates' greatness in his prime , its laughable , Camp-Coleman is under this warped clueless idea that Dorian in his prime was a pushover and Ronnie Coleman at his best would be so far ahead of Dorian its not even close , you're all obsessed with this notion that just because you personally like Ronnie phsyique better tha Dorians that this renders him easily beatable , it's called blind devotion

First of all you look at each competitors history , you'll see Dorian was never a push over , not for anyone , in his first pro contest he placed a close 2nd to Momo Benaziza who was a seasoned pro with 5 pro wins under his belt , pretty impressive debut , his second pro contest ever , he won convincingly , and in his first Mr Olympia he placed second another impressive debut in that contest and he beat the current Mr Olympia in the musculairty round , 1991 Mr Olympia was the second and last time he ever finished lower than first in a contest , he absolutely dominated everyone in his contests , no one on paper or in reality came close , you can go on about how this guy should have placed and this guy looked better , blah, blah , blah , lets talk about what did happen , Dorian to the best of my knowledge recieved straight firsts in every single one of his Olympia wins , you can't counter that , my opinion doesn't matter and neither does yours , the fact is the judges saw him as a very dominating bodybuilder , so even if you deny this or think the contrary , it doesn't change the fact , that Dorain was the absolute greatest bodybuilder from 1992 - 1997

1993 Mr Olympia the judges didn't even need to include Dorian in the muscularity round because of his dominating superiority and Wayne only called him out to please the audience , do you have any comprehension on how insane that is? the 1993 Mr Olympia feild was littered with a lot of great competitors , it was a deep feild with some very high quality guys and Dorian trounced them all , Flex Wheeler conceded the Olympia was for second place until Dorian retires !! and you think for one single moment that Ronnie Coleman a man who Dorian beat easily on eight seperate encounters would be good enough to beat 1993 Yates with 7 extra pounds and improved hardness , nevermind beat him easily? look I'm a intelligent person , I know if they did meet , it could in theory go either way , and in fact it may be close , but in the end Dorian would beat Ronnie even if only by a few points , but given Yates past history , his overall win percentage , the fact that he dominated everyone in his prime , from a logical standpoint its safe to assume Yates would win as well as a mathmatical standpoint , so for Camp-Coleman to say its not even close and Ronnie would beat him easily , shows your bias & illogical behavior  , and contempt for Dorian to the point of delusion that Ronnie at the same weight as 93 Yates is so far ahead of him that he would dominate Dorian , Dorian set the standard in 1993 for size & hardness , Ronnie couldn't match that in 1999 so dominating Dorian is fantasy , if anything it would be a close contest with one beating the other by mere points !!

Now I made the claim that Ronnie is a collection of freaky parts and they really don't tie together well , he has medicore balance & proportion , and I stand by that claim , and I used a perfect example of what I feel is someone who does have a collection of amazing parts coupled with great balance & proportion , so that pic wasn't to ' denigrate ' Ronnie is an example of exactly what I'm talking about and its 100% accurate !

And I do take Peter McGough's opinion seriously , he's been in the game a long time and he knows what he' talking about , I don't agree with everything he says but I respect his opinion , he's consistant and honest , and Camp-Coleman uses this to their advantage when it suits thier purposes , like when Peter said one of the greatest phsyiques he's ever seen onstage was 2001 Arnold Classic Ronnie , so when its ideal for Coleman groupies to use it its okay but when it contradicts your opinion then its not  ::) don't be hypocritical , you can have a different opinion than him but don't be so quick to dismiss it when I use it as a example , and one things for sure Peter McGough has forgotten more about bodybuilding then you or I have ever learned !!

Now in the end its all just speculation and opinion and basically neither of us are wrong and thats why this is now well over 100 pages , however I feel I'm basing my opinion more objectively and logicaly than most others , I'm not emotionaly wrapped up in Dorian Yates as you guys appear to be with Ronnie Coleman , and you guys can't even understand how he won any Mr Olympias and Hulkster himself said Dorian was the most overrated bodybuilder of all time and I'm to believe for a moment you guys can look , unbiasedly , objectively , and honestly? get serious , so until you can do what I just did , which is break this down using logic , common sense , objectivity , intelligence and honesty , you'll never be equal to me , just like Ronnie wasn't equal to Dorian !!  ;)

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #2774 on: June 01, 2006, 06:01:38 AM »
Quote
Guys i say we stop engaging in this dance with ND. He's not getting it. I can't believe anyone in their right mind would think this looks good.

This is the crux of the matter; those with flawed rationales and suspect eye sight are not going to have the veils of self-delusion suddenly lifted-the pictures and plenty of evidence are already there. At this point it's akin to dealing with parrots repeating the same phrases over and over again: "Dorian's not tier-B, Dorian's not tier-B".


Quote
Dorian replies to a question made to him by Peter McGough, a few months before the 97 O, about who he thinks would be able to de-throne him:

  "I don't want to sound arrogant, but if all the other guys were to come into the contest in their best shapes ever, and I were to beneath my best, not only would I still win, but there would be a fair distance between myself anf whoever finishes second."

What an arroggant turd! It makes his physique all the uglier to see this lack of humility in the face of the good fortune that was accorded him by the IFBB. At least have the humility to acknowledge the reality that it was unquestionably close over guys who often looked better! Lavrone, Dillet and Wheeler; Yates looked like SHIT at some shows and was still allowed to win. Apparently he never acknowledged the "arrangement" and could have at least STFU and been gracious rergarding uncle Joe's gifts.

In reality, he was put out to pasture rather than run the risk of a debacle.