Ronnie's ab-thigh sucks , plain & simple , you can go on to ad nausem about his superior quads , they don't do dick for his ab-thigh shot , oh wait they do , they draw attention to his very small ( in relation ) calves that lack shape & development , Ronnie's midsection as a whole , especially in 2003 leaves a LOT to be desired , his abs are convexed even when held tight , they lack great shape and detail , and seperation , his serratus , intercostles and obliques are smooth as a babies bottom , while on the topic obliques they're like the Universe ever expanding , his taper , especially compared to what it use to be is lacking , his over detail & crisp musuclarity are missing in action , you need refference for that check 1998 !!
Its called the " ab & thigh " shot for a reason you moron.
Its not the " how do my abdominals and thighs compliment my calves " pose.
Obviously superior thighs DO impact the " ab & thigh " or it wouldn't be the " ab & thigh " .
Hefty logic...
You can't hand Dorian the ab & thigh simply because his gastrocnemius extends further beyond the medial portion of his tibia. Its stupid and not one single rational judge would actually take the calves into such consideration UNLESS the competitor's thighs and abdominals were roughly comparable, and in this case they are not, not by a long shot.
You can make statements that are flat out
wrong for another 200 pages and I will call you on them everytime. Ronnie's midsection was not convex during the 2003 Mr. Olympia.
Visual proof:
COLEMAN'S MIDSECTION IS NOT CONVEX
I will relentlessly call you out on your bullshit ND. I have done this for the past 20 pages, and anybody reading through this thread will realize that I am continually embarrassing you, and your ignorance to this fact only makes it all the more amusing. You have every right to your opinion ND, but you have no right to repeatedly lie, OUTRIGHT LIE, in your defense of Yates.
