You compare shots with both of them at their worst? What is that supposed to prove?
We are concerned with their peak forms, respectively, and how they stack up with one another.
Fact is, Dorian has far less density, balance, and proportion than Ronnie at his best.
Attempting to prove that Ronnie has looked worse at one point in his career means nothing.
Moron. It was
YOU who insisted on comparing them at their worst, when you brought up his 2003 and 2004 forms. Ronnie looks
DISGUSTING at over 280+ lbs. Disgusting! The fact that you praise that shit goes to show you like the Greg Kovacs school of
MASSbuilding. You're way out of your league, gaming geek. Why was Flex Wheeler and Shawn Ray some of the most dominant biodybuilders ever, even though the former competed around 230 lbs and the latter, around 210 lbs? Because they had superb balance&proportions, with great details and striations.
Ronnie in 2003 had huge size and good - not great - hardness, but his degree of separation, striations and proportions was
CLEARLY inferior to Dorian's. I posted the pics of the 270 lbs Dorian because you brought up the argument of pure size. I mean, if we're going to ignore bodybuilding criteria of having even acceptble taper, passable details and proportions, then let's compare the largest version of Dorian to the largest of Ronnie! Game on, bitch! Why? Because the worst of Dorian, his 270 lbs version,
CLEARLYdefeats both of the largest versions of Ronnie. How? With greater fullness, hardness and
STILL better proportions!
I posted those abs-and-thighs shot and was appalled to see you thought Coleman's comes even close. No way, dude. Dorian
SOUNDLY defeats him at that pose, both at 257 lbs as well as 270 lbs. In both these versions, he has clearly better taper, is harder, has better dryness and superior balance&proportions than Ronnie. Dorian's abs-and-thighs, at 270 lbs, raping Ronnie big time!
SUCKMYMUSCLE
