Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NarcissisticDeity]

I wouldn't say Ronnie's arms lag behind anyone's. They may be history's best ever.


Ronnie and lee battling it out.

See above pics .

[NarcissisticDeity]

no I didn't- hedgehog said he preferred Ronnie 98 over Dorian 93.

The man has a brain

Prefer keyword but at least he's unbiased lol you internet-fan-boy .

[pumpster]

Another example for Iron Age turd-boy: Coleman with the edge in shape, cuts & vascularity over Priest.

Priest's peaks aren't even close either.

[pumpster]

Does not have Coleman's detail, cuts, shape or vascularity.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Another example for Iron Age turd-boy: Coleman with the edge in shape, cuts & vascularity over Priest.

Priest's peaks aren't even close either.

Oh so Ronnie has better peaks worse forearms and triceps but his arms are still better? lol and vasuclairty look at the Lee pics.

[Hulkster]

the way I look at it is this:

relative to his stature, Lee Priests arms are arguably the best ever.

But when he stands next to Ronnie, his arms get overwhelmed by the size difference:




as unbelievable as it may sound, Ronnie's arms actually make lee's look small onstage...

Ronnie has the best ever arms in absolute terms.

Lee's are probably the best ever in relative terms.

[pumpster]

Looks good! Better or comparable to Coleman? No.

[pumpster]

Ronnie has better peaks worse forearms and triceps but his arms are still better?

You're still not getting it, you blockhead. Coleman has *excellent* tris, it's just that his bis are ridiculous so someone with superficial understandings of BB like you gets fooled.

[Hulkster]

Oh so Ronnie has better peaks worse forearms and triceps but his arms are still better?

you have to look at how everything fits together ND.

That is the mistake you keep making.

You try and make the arguement that if the 2 of the 3 individual parts are better, thw whole is better..

But it doesn't work that way: the sum of the parts is sometimes greater than the whole:


and delts are paramount to arm complex too.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ronnie pound for pound can't touch Lee , and nevermind touch his triceps/forearms opps and balance

[NarcissisticDeity]

you have to look at how everything fits together ND.

That is the mistake you keep making.

You try and make the arguement that if the 2 of the 3 individual parts are better, thw whole is better..

But it doesn't work that way: the sum of the parts is sometimes greater than the whole:


and delts are paramount to arm complex too.

LMFAO you & pumpster are in the Retarded-Red with these statements , how they all tie-together? lol its called balance & proportion and I've been bitching about that since day one , Ronnie's biceps/triceps dominate his delts , that my friend is NOT great balance . and I was strictly refering to the ARMS alone when comparing Ronnie & Lee .

[pumpster]

Priest is amongst the best of the short guys re: arms but Padilla was still better: didn't have that overly cramped look & had much better shape, peaks, cuts & aesthetics.

[NarcissisticDeity]

You might be able to debate that Lee has better arms than Ronnie - at least in relative terms, but to say Ronnie can't touch ANYONE in terms of arms is silly.  There is no bodybuilder on earth out of Ronnie's league in terms of arms.

Ronnie arms are probably the most massive but the best not quite ,

[pumpster]

Ronnie arms are probably the most massive but the best not quite

As always he makes a blanket statement but can't verify or back it up, rendering it useless.

[NarcissisticDeity]

As always he makes a blanket statement but can't verify or back it up, rendering it useless.

See this is where you go astray , You claimed Ronnie's arms are better than Lees , I posted pics of Lee with clearly better forearms and triceps and you then say I can't verify it lol I already did , in all honesty the only advantage Ronnie has on Lee in terms of arms his size and thats it .

[pumpster]

What's funny is that ND attacks Coleman for his size, but is in love with Priest who is nothing but size-lots of things missing along with an overly-cramped look on stubby arms. He looks like Popeye-far from the most impressive arms.

Take a good look and you'll also notice that Coleman's arms are bigger, relative to his height.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Watch this video and come to your senses , He's not even pumped his entire arm is just outstanding on every aspect , biceps , speaked , split , gigantic , triceps , horseshor , full , striated , forearms , full , gigantic and vascular , top it off with balance and overall vasuclarity and my friend you have the greatest set of arms that bodybuilding as ever seen bar none .

&search=lee%20priest

[pumpster]

Impressive video! It also clarifies that he has thick skin that hides refinement & detail relative to Coleman, to accompany all the other great qualities and a few other problems like lack of relative biceps peak.

Also..his tris are about the same as Coleman's-in both cases they have excellent tris that are overshadowed by their bis. Novices fail to pick up on this and assume a deficiency that doesn't exist.

Yates on the other hand, has geniune deficiencies. Even most novices can see it.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Impressive video! It also clarifies that he has thick skin that lacks refinement & detail, to go along with all the great qualities.

Also..his tris are about the same as Coleman's-in both cases they have excellent tris that are overshadowed by their bis-to novices that is..

Thickskin lol refinement & detail , his biceps are split how do they lack ' detail ' ? his triceps are striated & seperated how do they lack ' detail  ' ? he has thickskin? his whole are is clearly defined and vasuclar how the fuck does he have thickskin? you're in Retard-Red again .

[Hulkster]

Ronnie pound for pound can't touch Lee , and nevermind touch his triceps/forearms opps and balance

look at these pics and tell me if you still agree with what you just said:


















Ronnie can match or surpass ANYONE in the world when it comes to arms..

not calves. Not abs.

But definately arms!

[Hulkster]

I posted pics of Lee with clearly better forearms and triceps

but better forearms and triceps does not mean you arms look better overall.

if that were the case, Dorian's arms would be comparable to ronnie's.

But they aren't even close.






see? you can't isolate the muscles.

how they all fit together and combine with detail and vascularity is just as if not more important.

[FREAKgeek]

LMFAO you & pumpster are in the Retarded-Red with these statements , how they all tie-together? lol its called balance & proportion and I've been bitching about that since day one , Ronnie's biceps/triceps dominate his delts , that my friend is NOT great balance . and I was strictly refering to the ARMS alone when comparing Ronnie & Lee .

Get the fuck out of here. Like Yates has great balance with his biceps and pudgy torso.  I can see your gut argument and his bloated look in the offseaon, but when he's shredded you're just dead wrong. His arms are fantastic. Dude, you just have some personal spite against Ronnie.

BTW he's owning Sergio there in the MM.

[Hulkster]

Get the f**k out of here. Like Yates has great balance with his biceps and pudgy torso.  I can see your gut argument and his bloated look in the offseaon, but when he's shredded you're just dead wrong. His arms are fantastic. Dude, you just have some personal spite against Ronnie.

BTW he's owning Sergio there in the MM.

agree in all counts.



 

Ronnie is (was) the modern Sergio.
You can see the resemblance.

[Hulkster]

Yet MORE video proof that Ronnie's back is superior to Dorian's:

(dorian getting owned at the 1994 Olympia)

Pay close attention to:

-the mediocre chest (compared to Ronnie)
-the mediocre arms (compared to Ronnie)
-the mediocre rear lat spread (compared to Ronnie)
-the mediocre back double bi (compared to Ronnie)
-the mediocre quads and taper (compared to Ronnie).

on the plus side, his lower back and calves were still excellent..

wow.

[pumpster]

A little exercise in BB common sense that seems to escape some, just to clarify this. You don't get to 23" arms with just biceps, given that triceps comprise the majority of upper arm size, for those that don't know.

Here you see Coleman with tris quite comparable to Priest. Both of them with size that dwarfs Yates' tris. Yates has good triceps cuts, like Coleman & Priest, but with quite average size-to reiterate you don't get small arms like Yates just with poor biceps size alone..