Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[pumpster]

ND following SUCKY's lead-any of those Coleman shots obliterate mr. no-arms Yates.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Wow even at a lower bodyweight ronnie owns dorian in the upper back, delt and arm details

The problem with Ronnie is his balance always sicked and here is Dorian at about the same weight.  he doesn't destroy Dorian in upper back Yates is 228lbs in this pic and his traps are thicker by far and more detailed & seperated his whole back is dryer but Ronnie's arms are outstanding and his delts have more striations . overall Yates at the same weight eats Ronnie in this pic.

[sculpture]

The problem with Ronnie is his balance always sicked and here is Dorian at about the same weight.  he doesn't destroy Dorian in upper back Yates is 228lbs in this pic and his traps are thicker by far and more detailed & seperated his whole back is dryer but Ronnie's arms are outstanding and his delts have more striations . overall Yates at the same weight eats Ronnie in this pic.

You've (again) misread what ive said.

Its got nothing to do with dryness or thickness, in the end of the day ronnie owns dorian with regards to detail. No matter how big dorian got or "dry" his delt and upper arm detail reeked of averageness

[NeoSeminole]

Damn, Suckmydick keeps owning himself

what's the point of big musles if you lack the separations to display them?

[Ronnie's] gut distension makes him lose the symmetry round flat out - just like it should have, at the 2003 Olympia. An appalling display for any bodybuilder, let alone to a standard-bearer.

In 1997, he had a torn triceps and biceps and his abdominal was distended - although not nearly as much as Coleman's in 2003/4

By way, these pics are from Dorian in 1997 and he still has a si-pack, a striated lower back and an incredible front lat spread. Too bad Ronnie doesen't look this good at over 270 lbs...

 

[NarcissisticDeity]

You've (again) misread what ive said.

Its got nothing to do with dryness or thickness, in the end of the day ronnie owns dorian with regards to detail. No matter how big dorian got or "dry" his delt and upper arm detail reeked of averageness

averageness? is that even a word? anyway you claimed his upper back had more detail I wholeheartedly disagree ! Dorian's trapezius is clearly more detailed and defined , he matches Coleman in reguards to detail in the teres major , infrasinatus and rhomboids , Ronnie has the edge in detail in the delts and biceps/brachialis overall Dorian has the obvious edge in overall dryness and balance , and density overall Ronnie at the same weight can't hang.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Another classic from Neoseminole  I love how Ronnie's the same height as Dorian despite his legs being spread apart by more than a foot . great job sport.  oh and calves the same size as Yates lol

[sculpture]

Another classic from Neoseminole  I love how Ronnie's the same height as Dorian despite his legs being spread apart by more than a foot . great job sport.  oh and calves the same size as Yates lol

Are you suggesting then if it was scaled absolutely perfect dorian wouldnt look so bad next to coleman?

What about his less dark skin?

Or the fact that he doesnt look so good on video or photos?

The excuses continue

[NarcissisticDeity]

Are you suggesting then if it was scaled absolutely perfect dorian wouldnt look so bad next to coleman?

What about his less dark skin?

Or the fact that he doesnt look so good on video or photos?

The excuses continue

Its no excuse those pictures are NOT scaled correctly thats a simple fact . and if scaled correctly Dorian wouldn't look small in comparison and Ronnie's looks fantastic in that shot I'm not saying Dorian could even beat him in that particular shot but lets be fair ! Dorian can afford to lost a couple of mandatories he has enough to beat Ronnie.

[suckmymuscle]

Damn, Suckmydick keeps owning himself













 

  Why, Neosemen? Because you purposefully choose the worst possible pics of Dorian, and then compares them to Ronnie's pics at his best? What is that supposed to prove, brainiac? By the way, I love it how you keep posting pics of Dorian from the 1997 Olympia and then matching it against pics from Ronnie in 1998/9. Well, guess what? Two things: first of all, even in 1997, Dorian kills your boy on several categories: he has greater density and dryness. His fullness, something which he always lost out to Ronnie when he's at his lighter weights, is comparable to the latter's when Dorian's over 270 lbs. Now, if we compare the worst version of Dorian(1997) to either one of Ronnie's two worst years(2001, 2004), then Dorian simply rapes Ronnie in the pooper. I mean, here is a comparison between Dorian in 1997 and Ronnie in 2004. Note how Dorian's lower bcak is still striated and how he still has a clearly etched six-pack. Oh my, NeoSemen, you've just been brutally sodomized by yours truly. You've just...

SUCKEDMYMUSCLE

[pumpster]

Its no excuse those pictures are NOT scaled correctly thats a simple fact . and if scaled correctly Dorian wouldn't look small

Scaling's a good changeup to use along with lighting and skin-color excuses.

[NarcissisticDeity]

 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Scaling's a good changeup to use along with lighting and skin-color excuses.

Or yours " he's not even flexing yet " lol 

[NarcissisticDeity]

 

[NeoSeminole]

Another classic from Neoseminole  I love how Ronnie's the same height as Dorian despite his legs being spread apart by more than a foot . great job sport.  oh and calves the same size as Yates lol

You are such a f*cking hypocrite it's not even funny. I scale Dorian and Ronnie within +/- 1 inch of each other in every comparison. Here are your "brilliant" works. Please note that Ronnie is 1 inch taller than Dorian.









 

[NeoSeminole]

Why, Neosemen? Because you purposefully choose the worst possible pics of Dorian, and then compares them to Ronnie's pics at his best? What is that supposed to prove, brainiac? By the way, I love it how you keep posting pics of Dorian from the 1997 Olympia and then matching it against pics from Ronnie in 1998/9.

Suckmydick, you are even worse of a fool than ND. The pics I used of Dorian are from 93 with the exception of the side chest (I don't know what year). I also used the best pics I could find of Dorian in those poses.









The pic I used of Dorian from 1997 was in reference to this quote by you:

By way, these pics are from Dorian in 1997 and he still has a si-pack, a striated lower back and an incredible front lat spread. Too bad Ronnie doesen't look this good at over 270 lbs...

You claim Dorian looks better at 265 lbs. than Ronnie over 270 lbs. So I compared 97 Dorian to Ronnie in 03 when he weighed 286 lbs. Dorian simply looks like shit next to Ronnie.

NeoSemen, you've just been brutally sodomized by yours truly.

 

[NarcissisticDeity]

You are such a f*cking hypocrite it's not even funny. I scale Dorian and Ronnie within +/- 1 inch of each other in every comparison. Here are your "brilliant" works. Please note that Ronnie is 1 inch taller than Dorian.









 

Hmm genius I posted the shilouette and prefaced it with DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO THE SCALE thank you I'll accept you're apology when you're man enough to give it , and I personally didn't scale those and again you're not taking into consideration that Ronnie's legs are far more spaced apart than Dorians couple that with Dorian's waist being smaller than Ronnies   and his calves being the same size lol and your ability to scale pictures correctly leaves a lot to be desired .

[NarcissisticDeity]

Suckmydick, you are even worse of a fool than ND. The pics I used of Dorian are from 93 (his best year). Look again.



]

The pics I used of Dorian from 1997 was in reference to this quote by you:


You claim Dorian looks better at 265 lbs. than Ronnie over 270 lbs. So I compared 97 Dorian to Ronnie in 03 when he weighed 286 lbs. Dorian simply looks like shit next to Ronnie.

 

Side chest isn't from 93 and the pictures you posted from before were from 1992 when he was 242lbs 1994 when he was 262lbs so nice try again but come on get with the program .

[NeoSeminole]

Hmm genius I posted the shilouette and prefaced it with DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO THE SCALE thank you I'll accept you're apology when you're man enough to give it , and I personally didn't scale those and again you're not taking into consideration that Ronnie's legs are far more spaced apart than Dorians couple that with Dorian's waist being smaller than Ronnies   and his calves being the same size lol and your ability to scale pictures correctly leaves a lot to be desired.

I like how you don't use their actual height as a criteria. Instead, you focus more on calf and waist size relative to each other even if that means Dorian magically becomes 3 inches taller than Ronnie. Look at the difference between your comparisons and mine. I admit my comparisons are not perfect, but they are a hell of a lot more accurate than anything you've posted. I already told you how to make them. Now stfu and get to work!!!

[pumpster]

I scale Dorian and Ronnie within +/- 1 inch of each other in every comparison.

As long as the heights are approximately the same, it doesn't matter-this is just another ND gimmick to divert attention from the ownage.

[NarcissisticDeity]

I like how you don't use their actual height as a criteria. Instead, you focus more on calf and waist size relative to each other even if that means Dorian magically becomes 3 inches taller than Ronnie. Look at the difference between your comparisons and mine. I admit my comparisons are not perfect, but they are a hell of a lot more accurate than anything you've posted. I already told you how to make them. Now stfu and get to work!!!

I wish it was as simple as the program you use , photoshop is very complex 

[sculpture]

Suckmydick, you are even worse of a fool than ND. The pics I used of Dorian are from 93 with the exception of the side chest (I don't know what year). I also used the best pics I could find of Dorian in those poses.









The pic I used of Dorian from 1997 was in reference to this quote by you:





You claim Dorian looks better at 265 lbs. than Ronnie over 270 lbs. So I compared 97 Dorian to Ronnie in 03 when he weighed 286 lbs. Dorian simply looks like shit next to Ronnie.

 

Pretty much what i was goin to say. That front dbl bicep, side chest and most muscular ARE probably the best examples of dorian in those poses so i'm not sure where suckymycock is coming from.

[suckmymuscle]

Suckmydick, you are even worse of a fool than ND. The pics I used of Dorian are from 93 with the exception of the side chest (I don't know what year). I also used the best pics I could find of Dorian in those poses.

  I know, you dimwitt. The thing is that you've already posted this "comparison" a thousand times before - and Dorian simply destroys Ronnie in it. In any case, I was refering to the two bottom pics, which are from the 1997 Olympia. Pretty pathetic of you using that to show that he has a gut.

You claim Dorian looks better at 265 lbs. than Ronnie over 270 lbs. So I compared 97 Dorian to Ronnie in 03 when he weighed 286 lbs. Dorian simply looks like shit next to Ronnie.

  Oh, but Dorian does look better. Again, the 1997 Dorian against the 2004 Ronnie. Ronnie and you, once again, get brutally sodomized by me and Dorian. Dorian, at his worst, looks much, much better than Ronnie at his worst.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
 

[JamieX4200]

holy shit you guys have the yrs and weights memorized..? do you know when they take a shit too?

[NeoSeminole]

Suckmydick, now you are contradicting yourself.

By the way, I love it how you keep posting pics of Dorian from the 1997 Olympia and then matching it against pics from Ronnie in 1998/9.

In any case, I was refering to the two bottom pics, which are from the 1997 Olympia.

So which is it? I posted a comparison btw 93 Dorian vs. 98/99 Ronnie and 97 Dorian vs. 03 Ronnie.

I like how you ignored this part of my last post:

By way, these pics are from Dorian in 1997 and he still has a si-pack, a striated lower back and an incredible front lat spread. Too bad Ronnie doesen't look this good at over 270 lbs.)

[pumpster]

Why, Neosemen? Because you purposefully choose the worst possible pics of Dorian, and then compares them to Ronnie's pics at his best?

SUCKMYDIK not comprehending that Yates "good" & "bad" shots aren't easy to tell apart. hahahhahahaah