Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3517650 times)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7425 on: July 31, 2006, 02:55:13 PM »
Ronnie's back looks watery and puffy compared to Dorian's....especially Dorian's 93 version.

which version of Ronnie are you speaking of?
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83627
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7426 on: July 31, 2006, 02:55:51 PM »
]
look at the pics ND: it was not nearly as close as the scorecards make it out to be.

Everyone but you can see this as plain as day.

Other than the quads (and abs) Ronnie make flex looks SMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOTH top to bottom.



LMFAO now its not even as close as it was ? lets see when confronted with the fact that Ronnie was very lucky in 1998 lets abandon all sense & logic and rational thought , fuck-it it wasn't even close Ronnie dominated in 1998 lol man I love the plot twists you come up with lol seriously you should consider being a writter .

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7427 on: July 31, 2006, 02:57:03 PM »
Quote
Ronnie's back looks watery and puffy compared to Dorian's....especially Dorian's 93 version.

I'd say you're alone other than SUCKY and ND in that bizarre, biased assessment. Yates' back was drier and denser I agree but Coleman's was wider with better taper and still plenty muscular so just personal taste-one of the very few areas where Yates is comparable.

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7428 on: July 31, 2006, 02:57:06 PM »
which version of Ronnie are you speaking of?

1999 (video on YouTube).

The ONLY ronnie condition from the back that can compare to Yates 93O condition is the 01ASC but he was only 242lbs there and Dorian was 257, Ronnie wouldnt have a chance size wise.

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7429 on: July 31, 2006, 02:58:19 PM »
I'd say you're alone other than SUCKY and ND in that bizarre, biased assessment. Yates' back was drier and denser I agree but Coleman's was wider with better taper so it's apples and oranges, just personal taste-one of the very few areas where Yates is comparable.

how close was this picture to the 98O? Honestly, Ronnie's back looks very, very dry in this picture (moreso than the 99 video on YouTube).

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7430 on: July 31, 2006, 02:59:24 PM »
Lats were wider AND his waist wasn't as wide = much better taper and even greater illusion of superior width

How can you be sure? To me, lats look like a wash (dorians actually appear a bit wider and thicker to me), but Ronnie's waist makes the difference...

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83627
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7431 on: July 31, 2006, 03:00:41 PM »
You seem to chuck that term "back peddle" around a bit too often. Especially when it hardly ever makes sense in the context that youre actually using it.

It was only after 93 that he started setting trends

You backpeddle in the sense when confronted with the proof of his abdominal distention in 2003 at the prejudging you deflect it by pointing out Dexters in relation to Cutler

the first pic you claimed his gut couldn't be seen I posted one directly faces the judges you can't deny it so you deflect it

Yates did have some abdominal distention in 1994 BUT never in the likes of Coleman again I admit he started and the judges should have stopped it , the sport as a whole would have been better off.

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7432 on: July 31, 2006, 03:00:46 PM »
Does anyone have pre-juding video of Ronnie in 1999? I'm thinking he may be tighter and drier than he appears on the night show video posted on YouTube.

Also, does anyone know if the 93O is on DVD? The quality of the VHS is horrific.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7433 on: July 31, 2006, 03:01:39 PM »
How can you be sure of any attribute either of them has?

I don't think anyone's had wider lats than Coleman, maybe a few are close but none were named Yates. Yates' back is just as good IMO, because each guy has attributes the other doesn't. Yates has great density & dryness.

alexxx

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10129
  • Don't hate..
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7434 on: July 31, 2006, 03:02:22 PM »
bump
just push some weight!

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7435 on: July 31, 2006, 03:02:40 PM »
LMFAO now its not even as close as it was ? lets see when confronted with the fact that Ronnie was very lucky in 1998 lets abandon all sense & logic and rational thought , f**k-it it wasn't even close Ronnie dominated in 1998 lol man I love the plot twists you come up with lol seriously you should consider being a writter .

its not about "all sense and logic" its about LOOKING AT THE TWO BODIES!!

pic after pics shows Ronnie making flex look smooth:



why is this so difficult for you to understand?
Flower Boy Ran Away

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7436 on: July 31, 2006, 03:02:50 PM »
Quote
Quote from: sculpture on Today at 05:50:57 PM
You seem to chuck that term "back peddle" around a bit too often. Especially when it hardly ever makes sense in the context that youre actually using it.

It was only after 93 that he started setting trends

You backpeddle in the sense when confronted with the proof of his abdominal distention in 2003 at the prejudging you deflect it by pointing out Dexters in relation to Cutler

He picked up on the term each time I owned him.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83627
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7437 on: July 31, 2006, 03:02:54 PM »
How can you be sure? To me, lats look like a wash (dorians actually appear a bit wider and thicker to me), but Ronnie's waist makes the difference...

Exactly he can't tell unless they were side-by-side on stage and lat width may be a push . but density thickness & dryness isn't .

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7438 on: July 31, 2006, 03:04:03 PM »
Ronnie is extremely dry and peeled here, as similar as he got to Yates 93 condition, but again he is 15lbs lighter than Yates here. Can his shape and biceps make up for that 15lbs? I dont think so.


Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7439 on: July 31, 2006, 03:04:55 PM »
another shot of Ronnie's back in 1999:


Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83627
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7440 on: July 31, 2006, 03:05:11 PM »
its not about "all sense and logic" its about LOOKING AT THE TWO BODIES!!

pic after pics shows Ronnie making flex look smooth:



why is this so difficult for you to understand?

Dude you're seriously INSANE lol you're judging the WHOLE contest on pictures lol you're just completely and utterly insane lol Ronnie now dominated the 1998 Mr Olympia , its not even close according to a biased-Coleman-fan lol

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7441 on: July 31, 2006, 03:06:11 PM »
Ronnie is lucky Flex has FSGS or he never would have been Mr. O ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83627
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7442 on: July 31, 2006, 03:06:53 PM »
another shot of Ronnie's back in 1999:




Good job using a small one so it doesn't look like he's not that dry , Ronnie 98 trumps Ronnie 98 in overall dryness

benchthis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4286
  • operation deep throat
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7443 on: July 31, 2006, 03:07:18 PM »
bump keep it going  ;D

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7444 on: July 31, 2006, 03:08:46 PM »
Quote
Ronnie is extremely dry and peeled here, as similar as he got to Yates 93 condition, but again he is 15lbs lighter than Yates here. Can his shape and biceps make up for that 15lbs? I dont think so.

Only a know-nothing would try to reduce Coleman's domination to "biceps" and "shape". Through on huge size advantages in certain areas, better vascularity, better aesthetics, better V, better tapers all-round, better cuts by far in areas like arms, etc.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7445 on: July 31, 2006, 03:09:37 PM »

ND this pic is from 1999 not 1998
Flower Boy Ran Away

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7446 on: July 31, 2006, 03:11:41 PM »
Only a know-nothing would try to reduce Coleman's domination to "biceps" and "shape". Through on huge size advantages in certain areas, better vascularity, better aesthetics, better V, better tapers all-round, better cuts by far in areas like arms, etc.

HOW THE fuck are you coming up with he has more size? ??? They are both 257lbs...Dorian is shorter and therefore carries more muscle on his frame.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7447 on: July 31, 2006, 03:12:48 PM »
Quote
HOW THE f**k are you coming up with he has more size?  They are both 257lbs

According to this simpleton they should just WEIGH them onstage to determine the winner. IDIOTE! ;D

suckmymuscle

  • Guest
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7448 on: July 31, 2006, 03:13:47 PM »
HOW THE f**k are you coming up with he has more size? ??? They are both 257lbs...Dorian is shorter and therefore carries more muscle on his frame.

  And is also harder... ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #7449 on: July 31, 2006, 03:13:49 PM »
pumpster aka shit-stirrer 8)