Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NarcissisticDeity]

ND this pic is from 1999 not 1998

I know  

[NarcissisticDeity]

Only a know-nothing would try to reduce Coleman's domination to "biceps" and "shape". Through on huge size advantages in certain areas, better vascularity, better aesthetics, better V, better tapers all-round, better cuts by far in areas like arms, etc.

This is comming from the guy who reduced Dorian down to good calves & back lol

Oh don't forget Ronnie's better ' x-frame ' lol

[pumpster]

Quote from: pobrecito on Today at 06:11:41 PM
HOW THE f**k are you coming up with he has more size?  They are both 257lbs...Dorian is shorter and therefore carries more muscle on his frame.


  And is also harder...

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Too morons busy congratulating themselves on faulty thinking. According to this most silly absurd logic, Matt Millen at 257 lb. would have the same size as either of these guys.

[suckmymuscle]

  Coleman fans, refrain from commenting on any of Ronnie's version other than those of the 1998 Olympia, the 1996 Canada Pro Cup and maybe the 2001 ASC. Any other version of Ronnie has simply too many flaws to even stand on the same stage with The Yates.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[Stavios]

I hope everybody who contributed to this thread die with him right now !  

[Hulkster]

Dorian is shorter and therefore carries more muscle on his frame.

problem is, that is not a good thing:



 

[pobrecito]

Too morons busy congratulating themselves on faulty thinking. According to this most silly absurd logic, Matt Millen at 257 lb. would have the same size as either of these guys.

you really are an idiot aren't you?

let's see here...on numerous occasions you have already stated that Dorian in 93 had better conditioning than Ronnie. Now, both are 257lbs with Ronnie 1 inch taller. Therefore, *IF* they were both at the same BF levels (which we know is false, Dorian was drier and better conditioned), Dorian would still be the more muscular man. But the fact that he is even better conditioning means he is that much MORE muscular than Ronnie. Case closed. Why don't you just go stick your thump in your mouth and sit in the corner now

[Hulkster]

for the record, Ronnie looked infinitely better in 1999 than he did at the canada pro cup:


front pretty much perfect..



same with the back..

hell, even the ab and thighs look good:

[pumpster]

These goons don't that people are built differently and can have very different proportions at the same weights! This is very simple stuff yet it goes right over their heads. Yates has much more weight in his waist and hips along with thicker bones structure = blocky with far less taper.

[NarcissisticDeity]

problem is, that is not a good thing:


 

According to the IFBB judging criteria it is  


The comparisons of the compulsory poses cannot be overemphasized
as these comparisons will help the judge to decide
which competitor has the superior physique from the standpoint of
muscular bulk, balanced development, muscular density and
definition.



Lets see Dorian has the edge in muscular bulk , balanced devlopment and muscular density and definition will push . Dorian still leads the chase .

[pumpster]

According to the IFBB judging criteria it is 

The comparisons of the compulsory poses cannot be overemphasized
as these comparisons will help the judge to decide
which competitor has the superior physique from the standpoint of
muscular bulk, balanced development, muscular density and
definition.

Lets see Dorian has the edge in muscular bulk , balanced devlopment and muscular density and definition will push . Dorian still leads the chase .

More legalese AKA online verbal diahhrea.

[NarcissisticDeity]

for the record, Ronnie looked infinitely better in 1999 than he did at the canada pro cup:


front pretty much perfect..


same with the back..

hell, even the ab and thighs look good:



Canada Pro he had NO abdominal distention , pretty much perfect? oh and his conditioning was off from 1998 lol oh and lets not forget the bitch-tits yup thats pretty much perfect oh and mind as well throw in the smooth calves lol

[pumpster]

Another lame example that actually confirms Coleman's dominant taper even at less than his best. Even at less than his best Coleman's taper always blows away Yates..no comparison.

[NarcissisticDeity]

More legalese AKA online verbal diahhrea.

Ah when the criteria clearly & obviously favors Yates its to be ignore in favor of the imaginary criteria where the guy with the most ass striations and best X-frame wins lol where bitch-tits are excused along with pathetic calves .  

[NeoSeminole]

These goons don't that people are built differently and can have very different proportions at the same weights! This is very simple stuff yet it goes right over their heads. Yates has much more weight in his waist and hips along with thicker bones structure = blocky with far less taper.

Exactly! I actually mentioned this a while ago. Just b/c two people weigh the same does not mean they are the same size. There are individual differences in bone structure, muscle density, fat distribution, etc. Going by these goons' logic, a pound of iron must have the same volume as a pound of copper.

[pumpster]

Ah when the criteria clearly & obviously favors Yates its to be ignore in favor of the imaginary criteria where the guy with the most ass striations and best X-frame wins lol where bitch-tits are excused along with pathetic calves .

A pathetic attempt at english.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Another poor example-even at less than his best Coleman's taper always blows out Yates..no comparison.

Wow another spot on pumpster comparision , you're grasping at straws my friend with that one , Yates all time worse to Ronnie's supposed all time best and you're beating your chest over a taper victory lol

just one question where is it you explain that Ronnie can compensate size-wise for his gut despite being 13 pounds lighter in this comparsion? lol  you tool .

[pobrecito]

Another lame example that actually confirms Coleman's dominant taper even at less than his best. Even at less than his best Coleman's taper always blows away Yates..no comparison.

Post Ronnie at his best and Dorian at his worst bwahahah, look at the level this moron has to stoop to in order to "prove" his lame argument. I already put you in check....now go sit in the corner like I told you son

[pumpster]

Quote from: pumpster on Today at 06:21:21 PM
These goons don't that people are built differently and can have very different proportions at the same weights! This is very simple stuff yet it goes right over their heads. Yates has much more weight in his waist and hips along with thicker bones structure = blocky with far less taper.

Exactly! I actually mentioned this a while ago. Just b/c two people weigh the same does not mean they are the same size. There are individual differences in bone structure, muscle density, fat distribution, etc. Going by these goons' logic, a pound of iron must have the same volume as a pound of copper.

ONLY NOVICES WOULD KEEP TRYING TO USE COMPARABLE BODYWEIGHTS..

[suckmymuscle]

Too morons busy congratulating themselves on faulty thinking. According to this most silly absurd logic, Matt Millen at 257 lb. would have the same size as either of these guys.

  Ugh...we're comparing top pros, you dimwitt. Are you actually saying, that the 257 lbs Ronnie, has better hardnes and dryness than Dorian at a similar weight? Now...not even you can stoop so low. I agree that Ronnie has still has Dorian on details on his front quads. But, c'mon...Dorian's back is wider, thicker and more detailed than Coleman's. Ronnie did have better upper back details, than Dorian, at the 1998 olympia, but he lost that to Dorian when he went to 257 lbs. At the same weight, Dorian takes him out in back thickness, width and separations. He has better lower body balance and better forearms. His triceps, at that weight, not only have better shape and striations, but also greater mass. Dorian's chest is thicker. And his overrall look is much, much harder. the only thing, that the 1999 Ronnie has on Dorian, is biceps and maybe quadriceps separations. Seriously, Poop, you spill more shit than an open sewer.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[NarcissisticDeity]

Exactly! I actually mentioned this a while ago. Just b/c two people weigh the same does not mean they are the same size. There are individual differences in bone structure, muscle density, fat distribution, etc. Going by these goons' logic, a pound of iron must have the same volume as a pound of copper.

Oh than that must explain why in your compasrions Ronnie has bigger calves than Dorian LMFAO and Ronnies waist is just as big as Dorians lol why didn't you use this ' explination ' before?  

[pumpster]

Quote from: pumpster on Today at 06:26:42 PM
Another poor example-even at less than his best Coleman's taper always blows out Yates..no comparison.

Wow another spot on pumpster comparision , you're grasping at straws my friend with that one , Yates all time worse to Ronnie's supposed all time best and you're beating your chest over a taper victory lol

I provided valid proof including a pic ND PROVIDED; irrefutable. ND in the meantime just babbles on = spinning wheels.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Post Ronnie at his best and Dorian at his worst bwahahah, look at the level this moron has to stoop to in order to "prove" his lame argument. I already put you in check....now go sit in the corner like I told you son

pumpster is owned now go sit in the corner you child lol

[pobrecito]

cumster has been put in check....from now on all his posts shall be deemed irrelevant and idiotic

[NeoSeminole]

Suckmydick, shut up and respond to these posts you keep ignoring (I wonder why)

Symmetry round - Dorian wins: he has a tighter midsection and more separated abdominals and serratus. His calves are in proportion to his quadriceps. Dorian's triceps, biceps and forearms are all in balance, whereas in Ronnie's case, the entire arms are overpowered by the biceps...just like his monstrous quadriceps overpower his defective calves - and especially the soleus.

As you can see, Dorian's gut was bigger than Ronnie's when it mattered. Dorian also had crappy triceps to match his medicore biceps. Look at the second pic of Dorian. Asymmetrical, unbalanced arms are WORSE than unbalanced calves anyday. Ronnie would win the symmetry round.

Please don't respond with an ab-and-thigh pic of Dorian b/c that pose is not included in the symmetry round.

and...

Suckmydick, look at the background you dipshit. It's from the 04 Mr. Olympia.

03



04