Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3518115 times)

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #7825 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:24:01 PM »

I like how probrecito ignored my post.

Quote from: pobrecito on August 04, 2006, 11:44:01 AM

becuase striations and separations are all genetic. Look at Dorian's quads, he just has fucked up shape. But he was sliced. He took his physique as far as his genetics would allow. Like I've said prior, I believe Dorian did more with his genetic potential than Coleman has. And in my opinion, that's the only way you can judge the two. If you just went based off genetics, Paul Dillet would be #1

I understand what you are saying. That is why I mentioned Ronnie has separations and striations everywhere. Some people are genetically blessed with having standout bodyparts like Flex's quads and back. However, they may lack the same detail in other parts like glutes. Ronnie has striations in his triceps, chest, back, quads, and glutes. His separations are no fluke either. If separations and striations aren't a measure of one's degree of conditioning, then what is?

Hulkster · « **Reply #7826 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:25:17 PM »

Ronnie all the way

rocket · « **Reply #7827 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:26:30 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on August 04, 2006, 08:05:21 PM

MONSTER denial of Yates' graininess. Everyone knows he had the best conditioning of all-time. The only pro that is even remotely close to the dryness Yates presented is Branch Warren

He was grainy but not as grainy as you idiots would like to portray. Those infamous black and white photos are almost always touched up. Or do walls and gym equipment possess similar levels of grainyness too?

I said post some clear pictures of him.

pobrecito · « **Reply #7828 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:26:55 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on August 04, 2006, 08:24:01 PM

I like how probrecito ignored my post.

I understand what you are saying. That is why I mentioned Ronnie has separations and striations everywhere. Some people are genetically blessed with having standout bodyparts like Flex's quads and back. However, they may lack the same detail in other parts like glutes. Ronnie has striations in his triceps, chest, back, quads, and glutes. His separations are no fluke either. If separations and striations aren't a measure of one's degree of conditioning, then what is?

muscle separation and striations are genetic. All is takes is one watch of the 93O to see how peeled like a dried onion Dorian was. He had the best overall condition of all-times. It just so happens he had shitty genetics for shape, separation, and striations (in the quads).

Hulkster · « **Reply #7829 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:27:50 PM »

Quote

If separations and striations aren't a measure of one's degree of conditioning, then what is?

apparently, if your major parts like quads arms etc. are smooth

then you have "the best conditioning of all time"

pobrecito · « **Reply #7830 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:27:56 PM »

Quote from: rocket on August 04, 2006, 08:26:30 PM

He was grainy but not as grainy as you idiots would like to portray. Those infamous black and white photos are almost always touched up. Or do walls and gym equipment possess similar levels of grainyness too?

I said post some clear pictures of him.

That's from the speed of the film you dumbass. Apparently you don't have a f*cking clue about photography.

Hulkster · « **Reply #7831 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:32:10 PM »

Quote

It just so happens he had shitty genetics for shape, separation, and striations (in the quads).

and the arms too.

against Ronnie, having arms and quads (and to a lesser extent, chest) flawed in comparison would be the kiss of death on stage.

after all, that is why you get comparisons like this:

Dorian would lose without question.

Hulkster · « **Reply #7832 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:33:52 PM »

dorian was lucky he was so much bigger than flex and shawn.

his size and width made the judges ignore his smooth arms quads and chest.

pobrecito · « **Reply #7833 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:34:44 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on August 04, 2006, 08:32:10 PM

and the arms too.

against Ronnie, having arms and quads (and to a lesser extent, chest) flawed in comparison would be the kiss of death on stage.

after all, that is why you get comparisons like this:

Dorian would lose without question.

Dorian would make Ronnie look soft like a baby's ass...just like he does in these 2 pictures. Plus, Ronnie is way too small in this comparison.

pobrecito · « **Reply #7834 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:36:12 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on August 04, 2006, 08:33:52 PM

dorian was lucky he was so much bigger than flex and shawn.

his size and width made the judges ignore his smooth arms quads and chest.

smooth LOL...you wanna see smooth and pathetic, check Coleman at the 2002O

pobrecito · « **Reply #7835 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:36:49 PM »

Ronnie could never match this from the back....inferior back AND no calves

pobrecito · « **Reply #7836 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:37:56 PM »

Ronnie would lose the rear lat....even if you argue they are comparable in back, glutes, and hams...Ronnie still loses becuase no calves

pobrecito · « **Reply #7837 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:39:28 PM »

It's so damn good, let's check it again

rocket · « **Reply #7838 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:39:57 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on August 04, 2006, 08:27:56 PM

That's from the speed of the film you dumbass. Apparently you don't have a f*cking clue about photography.

So?

However it was done it was done intentionally.

Oh heavens chaps, I don't know about photography, how will I endure?

pobrecito · « **Reply #7839 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:41:40 PM »

just like granite

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #7840 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:42:35 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on August 04, 2006, 08:26:55 PM

muscle separation and striations are genetic. All is takes is one watch of the 93O to see how peeled like a dried onion Dorian was. He had the best overall condition of all-times. It just so happens he had shitty genetics for shape, separation, and striations (in the quads).

If separations and striations aren't a measure of one's degree of conditioning, then what is?

pobrecito · « **Reply #7841 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:42:48 PM »

Quote from: rocket on August 04, 2006, 08:39:57 PM

So?

However it was done it was done intentionally.

Oh heavens chaps, I don't know about photography, how will I endure?

if you are an ignorant moron, then please refrain from making comments. It was obviously a low light situation and Horton had to go to a higher speed film, hence the "noise."

pobrecito · « **Reply #7842 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:43:19 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on August 04, 2006, 08:42:35 PM

If separations and striations aren't a measure of one's degree of conditioning, then what is?

bodyfat measurment

pobrecito · « **Reply #7843 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:43:59 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on August 04, 2006, 08:42:35 PM

If separations and striations aren't a measure of one's degree of conditioning, then what is?

Oh and also, please tell me, why is it Ronnie had striations in his quads in '96 yet NONE in 99? (HINT: he was better conditioned in '96)

Hulkster · « **Reply #7844 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:45:18 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on August 04, 2006, 08:43:59 PM

Oh and also, please tell me, why is it Ronnie had striations in his quads in '96 yet NONE in 99? (HINT: he was better conditioned in '96)

but Ronnie's ass was way more striated in 99.

so he was actually better conditioned in 99

pobrecito · « **Reply #7845 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:46:09 PM »

Lights out for Ronnie in the ab-thigh.

pobrecito · « **Reply #7846 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:47:52 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on August 04, 2006, 08:45:18 PM

but Ronnie's ass was way more striated in 99.

so he was actually better conditioned in 99

Ronnie always had ripped glutes...even at the 1994 Mr. Olympia when he got last place to Yates.

Fact of the matter is Ronnie had no striations in his quads compared to 96 meaning he either had a layer of fat or water covering them up

pobrecito · « **Reply #7847 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:49:48 PM »

Ronnie has NEVER matched this level of conditioning, period.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #7848 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:50:02 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on August 04, 2006, 08:43:19 PM

bodyfat measurment.

The judges don't measure their body fat to determine who has better conditioning. If separations and striations aren't a measure of one's degree of conditioning, then what is?

Hulkster · « **Reply #7849 on:** August 04, 2006, 08:50:38 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on August 04, 2006, 08:47:52 PM

Ronnie always had ripped glutes...even at the 1994 Mr. Olympia when he got last place to Yates.

Fact of the matter is Ronnie had no striations in his quads compared to 96 meaning he either had a layer of fat or water covering them up

there is no fat on these quads: