Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[pobrecito]

Ronnie's belly is about to explode here

[pobrecito]

I already demonstrated why 03 Ronnie beats 05 Dorian in back poses. Ronnie overwhelms Dorian in muscularity and has better conditioning in his lower back, glutes, and hamstrings. Ronnie didn't exactly have small calves either. They were bigger than Jay's who is known for his large calves.

LOL...even Ronnie would tell you to put your crack pipe down man. I agree 2003 Ronnie wins ON MUSCULARITY ALONE...but not QUALITY...he was nowhere near as conditioned as Dorian. As I said, check the hamstrings to Cutlers, Coleman loses there, and he never loses in hamstrings. He sacrificed condition for size. Just watch BFTO 02 and 03. In 2002 he was 275 and set the TRUE new standard (compared to Dorian's 269)....in 03 when he poses he doesn't look nearly as good as 2002 but it 15lbs heavier....

[pobrecito]

you want to talk SOFT and NO DETAIL....look no further than Ronnie in 2002. Oh yeah, add in the gut protruding out farther than his chest. Dorian had a gut, but his stomach was always FLAT when he posed...here Ronnie's gut is sticking out in the front lat spread




add in the fact that Ronnie is only 245lbs here and he is DAMN LUCKY he faces the weakest competition of any era. Even Cutler in 01 form (255lbs) would have ass-raped him.

[NeoSeminole]

LOL...even Ronnie would tell you to put your crack pipe down man. I agree 2003 Ronnie wins ON MUSCULARITY ALONE...but not QUALITY...he was nowhere near as conditioned as Dorian. As I said, check the hamstrings to Cutlers, Coleman loses there, and he never loses in hamstrings. He sacrificed condition for size. Just watch BFTO 02 and 03. In 2002 he was 275 and set the TRUE new standard (compared to Dorian's 269)....in 03 when he poses he doesn't look nearly as good as 2002 but it 15lbs heavier....

I really used to respect your posts, but now you have become just as pathetic as Suckmydick. I already demonstrated why 03 Ronnie had better conditioning than 95 Dorian. Your only argument is countering with "no he didn't." Ronnie's hamstrings were sliced. Do you still think Jay's hamstrings looked better?

[Hulkster]

Ronnie's belly is about to explode here

that's dennis james not ronnie.

ronnie is in the middle and you can't see his gut in the pic.

[pobrecito]

I really used to respect your posts, but now you have become just as pathetic as Suckmydick. I already demonstrated why 03 Ronnie had better conditioning than 95 Dorian. Your only argument is countering with "no he didn't." Ronnie's hamstrings were sliced. Do you still think Jay's hamstrings looked better?

From the side, Ronnie has the best hamstring definition of all-times. From that rear lat posted above, it looks to me as if Cutler has the edge in definition (but not size). PLus, he has better calves

[pobrecito]

that's dennis james not ronnie.

ronnie is in the middle and you can't see his gut in the pic.

yeah, you can't see it becuase his arm is in the way ...and Coleman's gut was just as big as James'....I'm sure ND has some picture around...

[Hulkster]

Dorian was way more ripped from the back than this

ronnie looks grainy too in black and white..

[Hulkster]

allright Colemaniacs and Construction Workers, I will be up north catching monster fish this weekend, so this thread will be Hulkster-free for a few days.

Hopefully it will still be here when I get back.

In parting, I would just like to say that:

Ronnie is greater than dorian

and

ND is still retarded

[pobrecito]

ronnie looks grainy too in black and white..

I think Dorian still wins...it's close though..

[pobrecito]

allright Colemaniacs and Construction Workers, I will be up north catching monster fish this weekend, so this thread will be Hulkster-free for a few days.

Hopefully it will still be here when I get back.

In parting, I would just like to say that:

Ronnie is greater than dorian

and

ND is still retarded

Yates was one bad ass construction worker

[NeoSeminole]

I think Dorian still wins...it's close though..

Nice double-standard you hypocrite. You post a pic of Dorian's striated lower back as proof his conditioning is better. However, you brush off Ronnie's separations and striations as "genetics."

[pobrecito]

I don't use that as proof he has better conditioning....they both obviously have the potential to display striations in thier lower backs, yet Yates does to a greater degree.

Dorian NEVER showed the ability to show striations in his quads, on the other hand Coleman DID in 1996 yet at his "best" he never had striations in his quads, so what gives? Was he less conditioned than in 96?

[pobrecito]

This man could have dominated BB for a very long time if he wasnt such a lazy ass and struck with kidney disease

[Woten]

This man could have dominated BB for a very long time if he wasnt such a lazy ass and struck with kidney disease

No, he was the 'little black man' of that era that everyone was able to spout empty rhetoric about re: this guy could have been the best, blah fucking blah

He was brushed aside over by superior guys, deal with it

[pobrecito]

No, he was the 'little black man' of that era that everyone was able to spout empty rhetoric about re: this guy could have been the best, blah fucking blah

He was brushed aside over by superior guys, deal with it

He trained like a lazy ass....Coleman was 212lbs when he got his pro card.....and look how much he blew up....Coleman deads 800 going into an olympia and Flex does 405 on the smith machine...see a difference?....

[suckmymuscle]

I already demonstrated why 03 Ronnie beats 05 Dorian in back poses. Ronnie overwhelms Dorian in muscularity and has better conditioning in his lower back, glutes, and hamstrings. Ronnie didn't exactly have small calves either. They were bigger than Jay's who is known for his large calves.

  In all seriousness, this has got to be the stupidest post ever. Ronnie in 2003 would get some serious raping from Dorian 1995 in the back department. No shit! For starters, they are comparable in width, even though ronnie outweighs Dorian by 30 lbs. Secondly even though Ronnie surpasses Dorian for lat thickness, Dorian still has thicker rhombois than Ronnie. Now, when it comes to separations, Dorian simply destroys Ronnie: his rhomboids, latissimus, trapezius and teres major muscles are crisply separated. His lower back is so dry that his erectors are visible. Oh my, "Neo Semen", you have just destroyed yourself. Try to understand something, dimwitt: Ronnie's weight advantage in 2003, over Dorian, was all quadriceps muscularity and abdominal distension. By the way, stop posting that stupid comparison of yours - which you hve already done a hundred times -, because Dorian is giving your boy a serious ass pounding there.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[Colossus]

SOMEBODY PLEASE KILL THIS THREAD!!

[sculpture]

I give up now. Its getting really frustrating trying to explain how ronnie is superior to dorian.

Lets not be hypocritical , you ' insinuated ' I " ripped other members pictures apart " which I haven't . so it works both ways sport. 

I never insinuated, i outright accused you of it. The difference is, is that you actually did do what i'm suggesting, whilst i'm not a racist, which i personally find pretty disgusting that your willing to stoop to such a low level in the course of your arguments. You're lucky i can't find the exact thread which contained your outburst. 

[NeoSeminole]

Ronnie in 2003 would get some serious raping from Dorian 1995 in the back department. No shit! For starters, they are comparable in width, even though ronnie outweighs Dorian by 30 lbs. Secondly even though Ronnie surpasses Dorian for lat thickness, Dorian still has thicker rhombois than Ronnie. Now, when it comes to separations, Dorian simply destroys Ronnie: his rhomboids, latissimus, trapezius and teres major muscles are crisply separated. His lower back is so dry that his erectors are visible. Oh my, "Neo Semen", you have just destroyed yourself.

Ha ha, what a dumbass! You can't even see the rhomboids b/c they are hidden underneath the traps. So I don't know how you can say Dorian's rhomboids are thicker. I fail to see how he "destroys" Ronnie in back separation. Ronnie's traps, lats, and lower back look sharper. Ronnie also has better conditioning in his glutes and hamstrings.





Now watch Suckmydick post enhanced black-and-white pics of Dorian to attempt to prove me wrong.

[Rhino]

Wow! This thread needs a board of it's own.

[NarcissisticDeity]

I give up now. Its getting really frustrating trying to explain how ronnie is superior to dorian.

I never insinuated, i outright accused you of it. The difference is, is that you actually did do what i'm suggesting, whilst i'm not a racist, which i personally find pretty disgusting that your willing to stoop to such a low level in the course of your arguments. You're lucky i can't find the exact thread which contained your outburst. 

You're right you did accuse me of it and you've provided NO proof what so ever that's worse lol you're making shit up now . 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ha ha, what a dumbass! You can't even see the rhomboids b/c they are hidden underneath the traps. So I don't know how you can say Dorian's rhomboids are thicker. I fail to see how he "destroys" Ronnie in back separation. Ronnie's traps, lats, and lower back look sharper. Ronnie also has better conditioning in his glutes and hamstrings.





Now watch Suckmydick post enhanced black-and-white pics of Dorian to attempt to prove me wrong.

Ronnie's back in 2003 was soft especially compared to earlier versions . it lacks crisp muscularity , separation and detail . Compared to Dorian his back is very soft.

[NarcissisticDeity]

yeah, you can't see it becuase his arm is in the way ...and Coleman's gut was just as big as James'....I'm sure ND has some picture around...

247lbs with a gut  wtf ?

[Hulkster]

ND look at the rear double bi I posted from 2003 and then look at yours.

Any fool (even someone as blind as you) can see that ronnie is barely tensing in your pic.

gotta go..

ND still has no clue