Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NeoSeminole]

Hey Suckmydick, it seems the PhD's at Flex are wrong again.

[KTMckay]

Nerd, this from a dipshit who can't even write coherently.  Listen dickhead.  If being educated and making more in one year than you make in a decade makes me a nerd, so be it.  Instead of casting stones asswipe, why don't you graduate high school first and then try to debate those far more intelligent than yourself. 

wow.... your a homo.

[nicorulez]

KTMckay,  hahahahaha.  You my friend have not contributed anything worth a damn to this thread.  Why don't you go back and snuggle up between your mom's mammaries so you can eat your lunch.  Dipshits like you make this board very dull; at least have a decent retort than that. 

[pobrecito]

light weight.

[pobrecito]

wooosh

[pobrecito]

even in his 1981 form, Ronnie would still be annihilated

[pobrecito]

the best rear lat of all-times

[pobrecito]

[pobrecito]

Even at his lightest 242lbs 1992, Dorian still looked great.

[corinth]

This is what Dorian did to the competition

Didn't a gang of 76 Ninjas do that to Flex....if it had only been 75 of them I think he may have been able to avoid injury....

[NeoSeminole]

Ha ha ha

the best rear lat of all-times

Same bodyweight and better conditioning.

[pobrecito]

Ha ha ha



Same bodyweight and better conditioning.

Dorian's erectors look thicker than Ronnie's. Anyways, Dorian has better calves, Ronnie has better hamstrings. Secondly, you have to note that they both hit the rear lat differently. And as always, Dorian looks harder.

[NeoSeminole]

What are you talking about? You cannot even see Dorian's erector spinae b/c they are obscurred by a huge shadow. I'll give him better calves, no doubt, but Ronnie destroys that shot of Dorian in hamstrings, glutes, and arms. I don't know how you can say Dorian looks harder b/c Ronnie has better conditioning. Dorian looks puffy in comparison.

[pobrecito]

boy, even ronnie would tell you to put down the crack pipe...Ronnie ALWAYS had, and ALWAYS WILL look puffy and watery in comparison to Dorian.

[NeoSeminole]

I said Dorian looks puffy in that shot compared to Ronnie. There is no way a prime contest Ronnie looks soft and watery in comparison to a pre-contest Dorian. Maybe if they were both in contest shape, Dorian would look "harder."

[pobrecito]

Dorian is wider

[nicorulez]

I doubt that Dorian at 257 lbs is wider than a 2003 Ronnie at 286 lbs.  Ronnie is far thicker and has better arms, hams, and glutes.  The glutes, btw, are the biggest muscles in the human body; far larger than the lats and thighs.  Ronnie has him covered.  Granted, Dorian has phenomenal thickness and an excellent lower back.  However, he lags in glutes and hams.  His calves are amazing, though.

[NeoSeminole]

pobrecito, your comparison is not scaled properly. Ronnie is 1 inch taller than Dorian. Also, Ronnie's glutes insert much lower than Dorian's. Here is what an accurate comparison would look like.



The top of Dorian's head is not visible b/c the pic is dark. I included a brighter version so you can check I scaled their respective heights properly.

[nicorulez]

As I stated, a true scale photo would show that Ronnie dwarfs Dorian.  Hell, Cutler is wider than Dorian, and quite possibly Ronnie.  However, nobody has had the degree of muscle in their traps/lats/delts and arms that Ronnie has.  Moreover, his lower back is very thick and "christmas-like."  His glutes show how much more striated he is than Dorian.  His hams are infinitely larger and more cut.  However, Dorian has him in calves and hair. 

[pobrecito]

I doubt that Dorian at 257 lbs is wider than a 2003 Ronnie at 286 lbs.  Ronnie is far thicker and has better arms, hams, and glutes.  The glutes, btw, are the biggest muscles in the human body; far larger than the lats and thighs.  Ronnie has him covered.  Granted, Dorian has phenomenal thickness and an excellent lower back.  However, he lags in glutes and hams.  His calves are amazing, though.

First off, I don't doubt that with a 30lb weight advantage Ronnie may be slightly wider. Personally, I've never thought of Ronnie as being super wide, even Cutler is wider. The shape of Dorian's lats themselves as they flare out much more than Coleman's leads me to believe he would have some of the widest lats in history.

As for the scaling, I have no clue, I just linked that picture.

[Palpatine Q]

HAHAhahahaahahahaaha!!!!! you pro-Dorian guys crack me up. C,mon.....this looks like a freaking before and after muscletech ad. There is no comparison.

[delta9mda]

Ha ha ha



Same bodyweight and better conditioning.

guess which one is offseason, tard.

[suckmymuscle]

still at his worst Coleman still had ample taper whereas Yates had a H-taper and looked heinous. 

  Ready to get owned for the gazillionth time, Poop? So here goes. At his worst(2004 Olympia), Ronnie's taper was vstly inferior to The Yates at his best(1992 and 1993 Olympias - his density and conditioning were at their best at the 95 O, but that's a different story.)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[pobrecito]

I was watching BFTO 2003 earlier today and let me tell you Chad Nicholls was dilusional!! He stated that Ronnie had the flattest stomach that he has ever had

[suckmymuscle]

I believe that pic of Ronnie in the virtual posedown is from the 2001 ASC. The reason I use the 03 Ronnie for comparison is b/c I feel his muscularity is too much for Dorian to handle. Ronnie's combination of mass, conditioning, and symmetry would overwhelm Dorian.

  Wrong, NeodrinkmySemen! Ronnie's conditioning was good in 2003, but still not in Dorian's league. His musularity was inredible and pehaps the judges would give him the nod on over Dorian on that alone. But his symmetry&proportions and his lack of separations were atrocious. Ronnie could never, even in his wildest dreams, have this iron-dense mass with such superb conditioning and balance&proportions from head to toe. Give up...

SUCKMYMUSCLE