Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NeoSeminole]

guess which one is offseason, tard.

If you bothered to read my response, then you could've spared yourself from looking like a fool. Pobrecito posted a shot of Dorian and called it "the best rear lat of all-times." I responded with a pic of 03 Ronnie in contest condition to poke fun at him. The Dorian nuthuggers love to post pre-contest pics of Dorian to show his "size" and then respond with the convenient excuse "oh, well that pic is offseason" when you post a better shot of Ronnie.

[suckmymuscle]

As I stated, a true scale photo would show that Ronnie dwarfs Dorian.  Hell, Cutler is wider than Dorian, and quite possibly Ronnie.  However, nobody has had the degree of muscle in their traps/lats/delts and arms that Ronnie has.  Moreover, his lower back is very thick and "christmas-like."  His glutes show how much more striated he is than Dorian.  His hams are infinitely larger and more cut.  However, Dorian has him in calves and hair. 

  You are a hater. That summarizes it. Try to understand something turd: Dorian had the widest lats of all times. Only Ronnie in his 2003 form can match that - whih he should, onsidering he was some 30 lbs heavier. Dorian simply dwarfes the 1998/9 Ronnie when it comes to lat width. And while the 2003 Ronnie has lats that are omparble in width they simply lacked Dorian's density, separations and dryness.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[NeoSeminole]

Ready to get owned for the gazillionth time, Poop? So here goes. At his worst(2004 Olympia), Ronnie's taper was vstly inferior to The Yates at his best(1992 and 1993 Olympias - his density and conditioning were at their best at the 95 O, but that's a different story.)

Ha ha, Suckmydick posts pics of Dorian hitting a latspread compared to Ronnie hitting a most muscular. Then he claims Dorian has a better taper as evident by the pics. No shit.

[pobrecito]

this is so perfect you totally forget about the abs...

[suckmymuscle]

Ha ha, Suckmydick posts pics of Dorian hitting a latspread compared to Ronnie hitting a most muscular. Then he claims Dorian has a better taper as evident by the pics. No shit.

  Picking at straws for lack of content. Ok, since you want to go down that road, here's a comparison of both of them hitting the same mandatory, the abdominals-and-thighs. Ronnie's pic is from the 2004 Olympia, and Dorian's, from 1996 - a year his taper was good, but not at it's best. And Dorian still owns Ronnie and I still own you.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

  P.S: Both Dexter and Cutler also own Ronnie.

[pobrecito]

 Picking at straws for lack of content. Ok, since you want to go down that road, here's a comparison of both of them hitting the same mandatory, the abdominals-and-thighs. Ronnie's pic is from the 2004 Olympia, and Dorian's, from 1996 - a year his taper was good, but not at it's best. And Dorian still owns Ronnie and I still own you.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

  P.S: Both Dexter and Cutler also own Ronnie.

Dorian 250lbs, Ronnie 287lbs. Dorian gets dwarfed. End of Story

Suckmydick owned again!!!

[NeoSeminole]

Wrong, NeodrinkmySemen! Ronnie's conditioning was good in 2003, but still not in Dorian's league. His musularity was inredible and pehaps the judges would give him the nod on over Dorian on that alone. But his symmetry&proportions and his lack of separations were atrocious. Ronnie could never, even in his wildest dreams, have this iron-dense mass with such superb conditioning and balance&proportions from head to toe. Give up...

I already said 93 Dorian had better conditioning than 03 Ronnie. However, Ronnie simply overwhelms Dorian in muscularity. Dorian would look like Shawn Ray next to Ronnie. You are out of your f*cking mind if you think Dorian had better separations. Ronnie in 03 had separations in his chest, shoulders, triceps, quads, hamstrings, and glutes. The only version of Dorian that could compete with Ronnie would be his 95 version. Even so, Dorian was still over 20 lbs lighter, had a torn biceps, and would lose his advantage in conditioning.

[nicorulez]

Suckmyowncock, I am not a hater.  I call them like I see them.  Dorian in 1993 was out of this world.  The rest of years.... .  Ronnie in 2003 put up a package of size and conditioning that has never been matched on stage.  Dorian would have been dwarfed.  That is indisputable.  Whether the judges would go for the shape, vascularity and size of Coleman vs the raw, dense package of Dorian 2003 is a debate we will never know.  However, after 1993, any version except maybe 1995 of Dorian would have gotten his ass handed to him.  If you want to compare 1993 Dorian to 1998/1999 Ronnie then be my guest.  Personally, I prefer Ronnie but would not cry out like a bitch (as you would) if Dorian won.  Thus, although I have been reasonable and rational, you continue to rant and belittle people.  That is why you have earned your reputation for being an asshole.  Simply put, you are an asshole with x-ray vision as you can see rhomboids...dipshit.

[nicorulez]

Sucky, BTW, that middle shot of Dorian's lat spread sucks. Stick to 2003 why don't you. 

[NeoSeminole]

You are a hater. That summarizes it. Try to understand something turd: Dorian had the widest lats of all times. Only Ronnie in his 2003 form can match that - whih he should, onsidering he was some 30 lbs heavier. Dorian simply dwarfes the 1998/9 Ronnie when it comes to lat width. And while the 2003 Ronnie has lats that are omparble in width they simply lacked Dorian's density, separations and dryness.

Dorian had wide lats, but I wouldn't say he had the widest lats of all time. I think that distinction would belong to someone with very wide clavicles. Jay Cutler, Dennis James, and Orville Burke come to mind.

[NeoSeminole]

Hey Suckmydick, you never responded to my earlier post.

it seems the PhD's at Flex are wrong again.

[suckmymuscle]

Dorian 250lbs, Ronnie 287lbs. Dorian gets dwarfed. End of Story

Suckmydick owned again!!!

  You're so fuking stupid your posts are not even worth replying to. But since I'm feeling ompassionate towards the mentally handicapped today, I will indulge your ignorane. You moron, my point was to show the difference in taper, not in musulrity. Get it? Obviously Ronnie has greater muscularity in that shot since he's 40 lbs heavier - with the gut to show! I was replying to Poop(pumpster), who said that at his worst, Ronnie still had a better taper than Dorian. Obviously, that is not correct. And by the way, "pobrecito"(the poorest thing about you is your mind), that pic of Ronnie is from 2004, not 2003. Oh my, I've just owned three turds today(you, NeodrinkmySemen and Dr.Queen).

SUKMYMUSCLE

[healthiswealth]

here's some more idiotic logic:

"since Yates was always lighter than Coleman, Yates would have destroyed ronnie if he was his weight"


The fact is that Yates WASN'T as heavy as Coleman. Coulda shoulda woulda. But he wasn't. Therefore, Ronnie is bigger, and size matters ALOT in this day and age.

[NeoSeminole]

Suckmydick, you have not owned anyone. All you have accomplished is being an annoying little dipshit. So far you have PM'd members with violent threats and wished cancer upon them. You claimed to be able to see Dorian's rhomboids. You posted shots of Dorian hitting a latspread compared to Ronnie hitting a most muscular as "proof" Dorian had a better taper. You also keep getting your Mr. Olympias mixed up. The background for 04 had "Olympia" spelled out in giant, pink letters. You keep posting pics from 03 and saying they are from 04.

[healthiswealth]

Suckmydick, you have not owned anyone. All you have accomplished is being an annoying little dipshit. So far you have PM'd members with violent threats and wished cancer upon them. You claimed to be able to see Dorian's rhomboids. You posted shots of Dorian hitting a latspread compared to Ronnie hitting a most muscular as "proof" Dorian had a better taper. You also keep getting your Mr. Olympias mixed up. The background for 04 had "Olympia" spelled out in giant, pink letters. You keep posting pics from 03 and saying they are from 04.

a self proclaimed "pwner" is just an insecure tard. Here is the rule: the greatest ownings come when other poeple admit that the target has been owned.

[suckmymuscle]

[quote author=NeoSeminole link=topic=69359.msg1275696#msg1275696 date=1155454705You posted shots of Dorian hitting a latspread compared to Ronnie hitting a most muscular as "proof" Dorian had a better taper. [/quote]

  nd yet right after that, i posted a comparison between Ronnie and Dorian doing the abs-and-thigh, in which Dorian's taper is destroying Ronnie. Did you comment on that? No, because you got owned at your own game.

You also keep getting your Mr. Olympias mixed up. The background for 04 had "Olympia" spelled out in giant, pink letters

  Well, my mistake: it's just that Ronnie was equally awful in both years, so it's hard to tell the difference.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[pumpster]

Obviously Ronnie has greater muscularity in that shot since he's 40 lbs heavier - with the gut to show! I was replying to Poop(pumpster), who said that at his worst, Ronnie still had a better taper than Dorian.

Obviously this shot SUCKY provided of Yates only proves that he was one of the BLOCKIEST Olympians ever - lats aren't as wide and waist is wider- the OPPOSITE OF GOOD TAPER. THIS GUY LOOKS LIKE A CONSTRUCTION WORKER YOU IDIOT.

[pumpster]

THESE ARE ACCURATE-COLEMAN KILLS YATES:

HUGE SIZE ADVANATAGES:

-LATS & SHOULDERS
-TRAPS
-TRIS
-QUADS
-REAR-DELTS

-GREATER TAPER = SMALLER WAIST, WIDER LATS/SHOULDERS
-X-FRAME - UPPER/LOWER BODY FLARE FROM SMALLER WAIST


YATES WINS:
-NICER POSING TRUNKS?

[pumpster]

At his worst(2004 Olympia), Ronnie's taper was vstly inferior to The Yates at his best(1992 and 1993 Olympias - his density and conditioning were at their best at the 95 O, but that's a different story.)

SUCKY has brilliantly concluded that Yates at his best looked better than Coleman at his worst...congrats you've established what exactly with that observation?

[kiwiol]

you f**cker..i will castrate you and feed your balls to donkey kong..

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA

  I already replied to this several pages ago, kiwi-fruit. Perhaps I should contact "sarcasm" about him allowing such a dim-witted turd, suh as yourself, to belong to his "squad" - the same guys who were on the audio-visual squad in high school. Hey, even a bunch of nerds should feel ashamed to have a turd like you as ally.
SUCKMYMUSCLE

I can't find the posts or the replies - maybe the mods deleted them. Anyway, so you are definitely confirming that you are shamelessly in love with the human phallus then ?

[suckmymuscle]

a self proclaimed "pwner" is just an insecure tard. Here is the rule: the greatest ownings come when other poeple admit that the target has been owned.

  The fact that you use "pwn" goes to show that you're a nerd. Oh, damn, you have just "pwnd" yourself.

SUKMYMUSCLE

[suckmymuscle]

Hey Suckmydick, you never responded to my earlier post.

  Or maybe they're right..maybe you professional anatomists have been raped by me and FLEX.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[suckmymuscle]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I can't find the posts or the replies - maybe the mods deleted them. Anyway, so you are definitely confirming that you are shamelessly in love with the human phallus then ?

  Kiwi-fuit, you're stalking me, so I'll just ignore you after this finl reply. The reason why I didn't reply to your thread, on the V board, is three-fold:

  1. You're a geek, looking for acceptance among the bunch of nerds who hang on the alphabet boards.

  2. You're so deprived of wit and subtlety that I actually feel sorry for you. My thirteen year-old cousin, who's in seventh grade, is able to come up with funnier and more clever put-downs than you and those other geeks from those boards.

  3. It is not me who keeps Dorian's posing trunks; it is you who washes "sarcasm's" underwear and who became his board bitch.

  So crawl back to the alphabet boards where you belong, where you and "sarcasm" can "own" each other's assholes as you make unfunny gay jokes ad infinitum.

SUKMYMUSCLE

[nicorulez]

So Sucky, explain to me and everyone with a brain why you are so passionate about this thread.  Yes, I can see you like Dorian a little.    However, earlier in the thread you called him a great man.  What is so great about him.  He won a few bodybuilding shows; did he cure cancer.  Did he donate time and resources to the betterment of the common man.  Or, as Kiwiol implies, did he provide you with his own personalized, authographed posing trunks with his man sweat.  Which is it Sucky?  Inquiring GetBiggers want to know.

P.S. you have been owned about as many times as a Miami street walker on Bayside. Peace all.

[suckmymuscle]

SUCKY has brilliantly concluded that Yates at his best looked better than Coleman at his worst...congrats you've established what exactly with that observation?

  No, it was you who said that Coleman has a better taper than Dorian even when he's at his worst. So, I posted pics proving you wrong. Since you have nothing clever to respond, you resort to ad hominem attacks. Here's a omparison between Dorian at his worst, at the 1997 Olympia, clearly and utterly destroying Ronnie at his worst, when it omes to taper. And also Dorian has a six-pack and separated serratus, which Ronnie doesen't.

SUCKMYMUSCLE