Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[IceCold]

do you see the Ronnie fans arguing that Ronnie has better CALVES than Yates?

or better midsection, presentation, mass WITH conditioning, hardness, balance.

 

[Hulkster]

oh, you mean mass without detail or shape?


okay.


and here we have dorian displaying the 6th best arms onstage!  unfortunately, there are only 6 competitors....damn..lol

better arms? thats the dumbest thing I have heard on this board since ND was still around..

oh wait - he started that argument

[NarcissisticDeity]

oh, you mean mass without detail or shape?


and here we have dorian displaying the 6th best arms onstage!  unfortunately, there are only 6 competitors....damn..lol

better arms? thats the dumbest thing I have heard on this board since ND was still around..

oh wait - he started that argument

Well Yates does have better triceps and forearms thats not debateable ! 

[Shockwave]

exactly. why are the yates fans so fucking stupid?

Hey. I am a Yates fan. Don't lump me in with Ronnie fans. You are ALL fucking crazy.

[NeoSeminole]

ND, how can you say Dorian had better triceps when the ONLY pose they looked good is the side triceps? Ronnie's triceps look good in the front double biceps, rear double biceps, front lat spread, rear lat spread, most muscular, side chest, and side triceps. Dorian also never had striated triceps and he lacked separation between his medial and long heads. You claim that poor calves are a liability b/c they are visible in every pose, yet you seem to ignore this when it comes to triceps. Dorian's triceps were mediocre in every pose except the side triceps. Ronnie's triceps look great from every angle.

[Hulkster]

I knew ND would be back .

ND, in order to welcome you back, I present you with this pic in your honour:


 
I know it is your favorite ronnie pic

[Hulkster]

ND, how can you say Dorian had better triceps when the ONLY pose they looked good is the side triceps? Ronnie's triceps look good in the front double biceps, rear double biceps, front lat spread, rear lat spread, most muscular, side chest, and side triceps. Dorian also never had striated triceps and he lacked separation between his medial and long heads. You claim that poor calves are a liability b/c they are visible in every pose, yet you seem to ignore this when it comes to triceps. Dorian's triceps were mediocre in every pose except the side triceps. Ronnie's triceps look great from every angle.

exactly. ND and co. have never been known for their reasoning abilities

[suckmymuscle]

please tell me some fools are not trying to rationalize dorian having better arms?

like this from the back...you have to consider all angles...

  But Dorian did have the better arms. The biceps represent a small part of the overrall arms mass, the rest of it being triceps - I'm not even including the forearms. All angles? I agree: Dorian's triceps were better than Ronnie's from all angles. But even if they weren't, the bottom line is that most of the points triceps an earn you come in the side triceps mandatory, and Dorian had the best side triceps. Period. Ronnie in 2003 did match or even surpss Dorian for triceps mass, but it was irrelevant, because Coleman's distended gut ruined the entire pose for him. So here, I'm posting shots of Dorian's triceps from the back and during the rear lat spread, showing that they were massive all over.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[suckmymuscle]

  Here are Dorian's triceps being more massive than Ronnie's at the back double biceps(they're bigger, denser and more striated than Ronnie's). Oh, his forearms are more massive and cut, too.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[pumpster]

i dont think dorian has better overall arms that coleman.  certainly not as bad as hulkster claims.

whe you consider all angels coleman has the edge on arms. 

More like an avalanche. If this is Yates' most impressive arm shot..

[LyricTenor]

His triceps look very thick in this shot.

[suckmymuscle]

SUCKY 200 pages ago i asked you for an overhead shot of Yates proving that he has more than great cuts, that reveals great tri size....still waiting..

  How about this? This shows Dorian's triceps to be incredibly massive on an overhead shot, while doing the abs-and-thighs mandatory. This pic is from the 1997 Olympia, when Dorian was far beneath his best...

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[pumpster]

Well Yates does have better triceps and forearms thats not debateable !

Last time i looked, size was one of the most important criteria, in which case Coleman's tris are as good or better given the huge size difference that's already been very clearly established. 

[pumpster]

How about this? This shows Dorian's triceps to be incredibly massive on an overhead shot

AN AB SHOT WITH ARMS SCRUNCHED TO ILLUSTRATE TRIS?

DESPERATE..

[pumpster]

Here are Dorian's triceps being more massive than Ronnie's at the back double biceps

Nowhere near the same size in that shot-sadly, they're tier-B in size & match the pathetic bis almost perfectly. 

[suckmymuscle]

Last time i looked, size was one of the most important criteria, in which case Coleman's tris are as good or better given the huge size difference that's already been very clearly established. 

  But Dorian's triceps are superior in shape as well. Of course, when it comes to size, the 2003 Ronnie surpasses Dorian for triceps mass. But the 1998 and 1999 Ronnies? No. Dorian's triceps are thicker and more shapely than the 1999 Ronnie's. I'm still waiting for a side trieps shot of Ronnie that can compare to this.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[pumpster]

Truly pathetic when Yates' arms are out-muscled in EACH shot with other competitors! That deficiency is not just limited to bis-bis AND tris have the same lack of size and balance well as a result of the mediocrity. (except for lateral/medial cuts on side shots).

[suckmymuscle]

Nowhere near the same size in that shot-sadly, they're tier-B in size & match the pathetic bis almost perfectly. 

  Bullshit. Putting aside the fact that Dorian is raping Ronnie in one of Coleman's signature shots, Dorian's triceps are clearly edging Ronnie's in thickness and separations, besides that they insert lower on the tendom. The only thing Ronnie has on Dorian, in this pic I posted, are biceps...by a slim margin.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

[pumpster]

Dorian's triceps are clearly edging Ronnie's in thickness and separations

Glad you brought that up genius...Coleman overwhelming Yates on ALL tri shots EXCEPT for side-tri...OWNED..

[Shockwave]

Sigh.

[pumpster]

Another double bi-Yates' tri size deficiency's in clear contrast to the hams hanging off Coleman..

[LyricTenor]

Why is ronnie's waist bigger than dorians?

[pumpster]

Desperate, SUCKY reverts again to the inevitable side-tri shots, Yates' ONLY good triceps shot...hahahaahahahahaha ah

Take a good look - Yates never had that combo of mass and cuts.

[Hulkster]

Why is ronnie's waist bigger than dorians?

because the pictures are nowhere near to scale.

if they were, Ronnie would have even more of an advantage - equal width - smaller waist = better taper

combined with bigger arms too

[suckmymuscle]

Glad you brought that up genius...Coleman overwhelming Yates on ALL tri shots EXCEPT for side-tri...OWNED..

  Oh, so you compare a 2003 Ronnie at over 280 lbs to a Dorian around 255 lbs and that is supposed to prove what? So now you've chosen to have the 2003 Ronnie as your standard? Wasn't it the 1999 Ronnie? Too bad Coleman couldn't hold his own at that weight without looking pregnant. Don't make me post pics of the pregnant Ronald Coleman, Pumpster. You always change your favorite Ronnie version whenever you feel you're losing the argument. When I criticize Ronnie's gut, you pull out pics of the wasp-waisted 1998 Ronnie; when I show pics of Dorian destroying the 1998 or 1999 Ronnie in muscularity, you post pics of the 2003 and 2004 Ronnie out of sheer desperation, to "prove" me wrong!

SUCKMYMUSCLE