Then by your own logic, you admit defeat to me since you never respond to my post. 
Nope. It so happens that I found it too retarded to even merit a response. But since you insist, here goes.
Perhaps, but Ronnie's triceps in 03 were bigger and more striated than Dorian's. You keep forgetting the triceps are composed of 3 muscles: the lateral, medial, and long heads. Ronnie destroyed Dorian in the medial and long heads. This is evident in any mandatory pose. Ronnie's triceps looked like hanging slabs of muscle from his upper arm while Dorian's looked smooth and flat. The only part of the triceps where Dorian might beat Ronnie is the lateral head. However, it comes down to personal preference. Dorian's lateral head is thicker but shorter. Ronnie's lateral head is longer and striated but not as thick. Furthermore, Ronnie's triceps had better separation between all heads.
To summarize: let's evaluate how each triceps had affects the overrall triceps, and how this affects the bodybuilder. The triceps mass of the anterior and medial heads is not very visible from the front. Sure, these two heads bulge lower hen they are very developed when compared to a bodybuilder who's anterior and medial heads are not that developed. Ok. The problem is that, in front shots, the biceps are the focal point of attention, and the triceps bulge from below is not really that important. The triceps mass of the anterior and medil heds would only be relevant in the relaxed round, when the physique is evaluated on the whole. Ok, Ronnie might win that if we're talking about Ronnie 2003 - all ignore his gut distension and how that would make him lose an un-biased contest, and focus only on triceps. But the problem is that bodybuilding contests are won in the mandatories of the muscularity round - and also in the symmetry round, whereRonnie 2003 gets flat out destroyed, but let's ignore that for the sake of conversation. So, how would Ronnie's moremassive anterior and medial heads represent an advantage to him agains a 1995 Dorian Yates? Well, let's see:
Front double biceps - Ronnie's advantage in mass in the afrmentioned two heads do not mean a lot here, because the focal point is bicpes, and the medial head is only seen well from the back. Ronnie wins this mandatory do to biceps, but not triceps.
Front lat spread - The triceps are not visible in this mandatory; Ronnie's advntage wouldn't mean shit.
Abs-and-thighs - Ronnie's more massive anterior and medial heads might represent an advntge over Dorian here. Too bd about Ronnie's midsection and abssepartion, though, but sinve this is only about triceps and nothing more, the let's ignore that and give the win to Rnnie.
Side chest - Putting aside Dorian's flatter stomach and more searated serratus, he wins this mandatory, when it comesto triceps, because, in this pose, Dorian's more massive and shapely triceps hed gives him the win. Dorian takes it.
Side triceps - No-brainer: Dorian flatout destroys Ronnie.
Rear lat spread - Ronnie's more massive medial triceps head tips the scale in Ronnie's favor. Point for Ronnie.
Back double biceps - The anterior and medial triceps head are concealed in this pose, so Dorian takes this mandatory when it comes to triceps - although he loses it overrall.
So,in conclusion: out of the seven mandatories, Dorian wins three, ties two and loses two. Dorian wins overrall. He loses in overrall triceps muscularity, but wins in symmetry because his triceps are more shapely. Furthermore, the fact that he wins the side triceps flat out is significant, because this is the
only mandatory designed to especifically showcase the triceps. Ronnie could never have a side triceps shot like
this: look at the shape and density of his triceps. Now, the impressivness of his triceps is compounded by him having a flat stomach and etched serratus, which is definitely not the case with the 2003 Ronnie. Game over. Once again, you're my bitch.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
