no, it isn't.
ronnie lost at age 43 -a valiant effort.
When did dorian chicken out and retire?
much younger than Big Ron 
and, just to fill all those newcomers in, even Ronnie 2006 last night never looked THIS BAD:
look at that.
People are quick to put down ronnie last night and put dorian up on this pedestal.
They don't realize how wrong they are.
give it up, hulkster. you lost.
ronnie's showing 2 days ago makes everyone realize just how good dorian was and the fact that coleman competed against guys that wouldnt even get call outs when dorian was competiting.
now lets talk about overrated. your opinion about what someone looks like is just your opinion, howerver, the score cards and lineups of the competition are different.
HUGE difference in the guys that dorian beat and the guys that coleman beat. the guys that coleman beat made him look much, much better than he really was. this olympia showed just how bad his strucutre is - with his short torso, abs, no calves, and now 1 lat and 1 tricep.
i dont really want to bash coleman. he was a great champ. if he were at his best and competed against dorian's best, i think dorian would edge him out on conditioning alone. dorian seemed a bit bigger (if you choose ronnie from 99), but ronnie had better shapes and details
however, i told you before that the judges pick the guy who is the biggest AND in the best condition. that's why jay won this year. ronnie never had the mass AND conditioning advantage over dorian and that's why he would loose. your analysis of shapes, details, taper, etc. may matter at the toronto pro show, but not at the Olympia.