we know how to view pics and videos that show yates has major flaws yet still recieved devine scores.
you don't.
you look at the scores without comparing them to the actual pics and videos and the competition itself.
there is a crucial difference and it is one that makes your arguments so shallow.
you can't explain how yates recieved such great scores given all the evidence that shows that he never should have.And I know you are going to chime in and say "well, you are not a judge"
No, I am not - and neither are you, but I have two good eyes and can use them to back up my opinions.
You can only use numbers and make up excuses when yates shows his major flaws.
That is why the ronnie side has such a strong argument: we back it up.
Hell, you guys go on about Yates "striated" triceps when every shot in existance shows they have no such thing.

Your entire argument is based on the following:
1. islolated, close up shots where anyone would look good
2. numbers that are meaningless in the context of this debate
3. fantasy muscles - eg "great quads", "great arms", "striated triceps", "great taper"
these are all things that do not exist anywhere except in your mind. No one elses. Repeat: no one elses.
And then you try and downplay the fact that you, sucky and icecold are the only 3 people that actually think that Ronnie was worse than yates.
3 out of countless people, on this board, on mayhem, everywhere.
Only ironagers like yourself believe that the higest standard the sport has yet seen was set way back in 1992 and 1993..
we have made progress since that date:

