Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NarcissisticDeity]

Weak. He compares Yates' back against someone known for having a mediocre back, proving what exactly? Here's the front view:

Dillett did look goof from the front and he had a fantastic structue , too bad he never had the conditioning & density to match it , oh not to mention his lack of posing skills , Dillett couldn't match Yates for that and suffered in the process.

[G o a t b o y]

418 goddamn pages about who's better, Dorian or Ronnie???


Are you people fuccking for real?

[knny187]

this is thread should be moved


Seriously!

[Hulkster]

haha ND getting owned. Dorian's back always been flat looking in the rear double bi.

thats one of the reasons, that, among many other things, his back double bi has been overrated:



notice how flat dorian's back looks compared to Ronnie's

this is something that ND cannot admit, but as we all are pointing out to him, its the truth.

[NarcissisticDeity]

haha ND getting owned. Dorian's back always been flat looking in the rear double bi.

thats one of the reasons, that, among many other things, his back double bi has been overrated:


notice how flat dorian's back looks compared to Ronnie's

this is something that ND cannot admit, but as we all are pointing out to him, its the truth.

Is that what you mean by " A new level of back development thats never been seen before " lol 

[Hulkster]

Is that what you mean by " A new level of back development thats never been seen before " lol 

no one understands what you mean by "new development" because you have not defined it as you are using it in context.

Ronnie had a BETTER back. Everyone but you can see that.

that is totally different than showing "new development"

as I said: the LAST person to Show "new development" on ANY muscle was Rich Gaspari, who showed up with the first striated glutes onstage.

that could probably be considered a new development in terms of onstage competition because no one showed up with that level of development before.

You are confusing the terms "BETTER" (as in the case of Ronnie's back over dorian's) and "new development" which neither Ronnie nor Yates had over anyone that came before them.

[pumpster]

Dillett did look good from the front and he had a fantastic structue , too bad he never had the conditioning & density to match it

Dillet looks awesome with great conditioning and density here-completely the opposite of your claim. You are clearly a novice when it comes to understanding BB.

[NarcissisticDeity]

no one understands what you mean by "new development" because you have not defined it as you are using it in context.

Ronnie had a BETTER back. Everyone but you can see that.

that is totally different than showing "new development"

as I said: the LAST person to Show "new development" on ANY muscle was Rich Gaspari, who showed up with the first striated glutes onstage.

that could probably be considered a new development in terms of onstage competition because no one showed up with that level of development before.

You are confusing the terms "BETTER" (as in the case of Ronnie's back over dorian's) and "new development" which neither Ronnie nor Yates had over anyone that came before them.

No you don't know what you're talking about when you claimed Ronnie showed a " new level of back devolpment " you made the claim not me I just called you on it and you've yet to come up with an explanation which you can't.

Ronnie didn't have a better back , Ronnie himself said that Dorian had the freakiest back he ever seen , so did Samir when he said Ronnie had the second best back of all time , but you and ' everyone ' ( comfort in numbers ) know better lol

[Hulkster]

no, you fool:

there is a crucial difference between the phrases:

"new development"

and

"new LEVEL OF development".

these are two totally different things.

[Hulkster]

but you and ' everyone ' ( comfort in numbers ) know better lol

you got it.

your opinion is by far the minority.

that because it is wrong and most people can see that.

[NarcissisticDeity]

no, you fool:

there is a crucial difference between the phrases:

"new development"

and

"new LEVEL OF development".

these are two totally different things.

Please explain to me what " new level of back development never before seen on a pro stage " means , please do .

[NarcissisticDeity]

you got it.

your opinion is by far the minority.

that because it is wrong and most people can see that.

I guess Ronnie himself is wrong and so is Samir Bannout lol everyone agrees with me so I'm right lol how childish . 

[Hulkster]

Please explain to me what " new level of back development never before seen on a pro stage " means , please do .

it means he had a better back than anyone before him to that poin. plain and simple.

having trouble with the english language today, ND?

[Hulkster]

I guess Ronnie himself is wrong and so is Samir Bannout lol everyone agrees with me so I'm right lol how childish . 

no, its not childish.

its called support.

something that your opinions generally lack.

[NeoSeminole]

ND, c'mon son. How can you say Ronnie's back development didn't surpass Dorian's?

[NarcissisticDeity]

ND, c'mon son. How can you say Ronnie's back development didn't surpass Dorian's?

In terms of what? Dorian's back has every single muscle just as developed as Ronnie , Ronnie has the edge at a higher bodyweight of wider lats but with all things being equal Ronnie doesn't surpass Dorian in terms of back development and the 2003 pictures you posted Ronnie's back is NO WHERE near as dry as Dorians .

[Hulkster]

ND, c'mon son. How can you say Ronnie's back development didn't surpass Dorian's?

because ND is blind and umm..mentally challenged..

[NarcissisticDeity]

because ND is blind and umm..mentally challenged..

You're calling me blind yet in the back double biceps pose , Dorian is destroying Coleman in detail , seperation and dryness , Dorian's lower back is crushing Ronnie's , its not even close , you picked a VERY bad year to show case the quality of Ronnie's back , 1998 would be better but Yates has him covered that year as well .

[pumpster]

Quote from: NeoSeminole on Today at 08:18:35 PM
ND, c'mon son. How can you say Ronnie's back development didn't surpass Dorian's?

SUCKY's beginning to look coherent by comparison. ND's left with voices inside the head repeating the word "Coleman".

[Hulkster]

I didn't nominate 2003 ronnie has having a better back, but it certainly was WIDER.

no one has had a wider back than ronnie at almost 300 pounds.

but his 1999 back was the best of both worlds: detail and width (and arms and great taper!) all rolled into one:

[pumpster]

Coleman greater width, smaller waist = superior taper, one of the most important considerations in BB. Yates has great density and a powerful look in this, his only major muscle group that is not a mismatch with Coleman.

Coleman's huge size advantage in traps & tris is also obvious.

[NarcissisticDeity]

I didn't nominate 2003 ronnie has having a better back, but it certainly was WIDER.

no one has had a wider back than ronnie at almost 300 pounds.

but his 1999 back was the best of both worlds: detail and width (and arms and great taper!) all rolled into one:

I agree 99 he was probably at his best but his back is great but Yates' still has him especially in the lower lats and lower back , Yates' has everything else Ronnie doesn mid-back up and beats him midback down , checkmate Yates .

[NeoSeminole]

You're calling me blind yet in the back double biceps pose , Dorian is destroying Coleman in detail , seperation and dryness , Dorian's lower back is crushing Ronnie's , its not even close , you picked a VERY bad year to show case the quality of Ronnie's back , 1998 would be better but Yates has him covered that year as well.

Dorian isn't "destroying" Ronnie in anything. I admit Dorian has better separation in that comparison. However, the difference in conditioning is nowhere near the difference in muscularity. Ronnie simply crushes Dorian. Here are other pics from 2003 showing Ronnie's conditioning from the back.

[Hulkster]

ronnie's back in 1999. 

[NarcissisticDeity]

ronnie's back in 1999. 

Great back no doubt but Yates still has him !