Can you actually handle the truth without more of the same excuses? He wasn't dominant for the most part, and benefitted greatly from Weider's generosity in some of the contests where other guys were better. Stop pretending that he "beat" them, as if the contest is entirely based on merit, you're naive.
wasnt dominant?
who was ever close to beating him?
i know you dont like going by scores bc it doesnt support your argument, but what else would you go by?
your expert opinion?
for instance, i think that ronnie beat flex easier than what the actual score says, but IN REALITY it was closer.
the judges know more about judging a bodybuilding show then me or you. they obviously did it for a reason.
if not then why werent the scores closer?
politics, you claim, may have something to do with winning, but why not make the score closer then?
why?
bc it was clearly apparent to most everyone, judges including, that yates was dominant.
based on what the judges have said (THE EXPERTS) you and pumpster are wrong they are the ones who make the decisions and score the contests.
whether you like it or not or agree with it, that's realitly.