Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3506210 times)

pumpster · « **Reply #10900 on:** October 30, 2006, 01:26:58 PM »

Quote

Dont you understand. It doesnt matter how many pics you post of Ronnie with his gut hidden. There are always going to be pictures of him with the gut.

And you're still not getting it-Yates washboard has distracted you from a WIDE WAIST thanks to overly-muscular obliques and structure = wider waist than Coleman ever had in front shots.

No one has ever denied they had guts that show up in side shots. Yates however, is the one with frontal probs involving a WIDE WAIST. Washboard abs do not help with his H-taper!

carvedoutofwood · « **Reply #10901 on:** October 30, 2006, 01:51:21 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on October 30, 2006, 01:26:58 PM

And you're still not getting it-Yates washboard has distracted you from a WIDE WAIST thanks to overly-muscular obliques and structure = wider waist than Coleman ever had in front shots.

No one has ever denied they had guts that show up in side shots. Yates however, is the one with frontal probs involving a WIDE WAIST. Washboard abs do not help with his H-taper!

cutler fans argue the same thing all day long,.... someone please post a few front double bi comparo's between ronnie and dorian... im in for a good laugh

pumpster · « **Reply #10902 on:** October 30, 2006, 01:59:59 PM »

Quote

cutler fans argue the same thing all day long,.... someone please post a few front double bi comparo's between ronnie and dorian... im in for a good laugh

Exactly - the battle of the blocky white dudes!

carvedoutofwood · « **Reply #10903 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:03:49 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on October 30, 2006, 01:59:59 PM

Exactly - the battle of the blocky white dudes!

seriously...

Hulkster · « **Reply #10904 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:04:37 PM »

Quote from: carvedoutofwood on October 30, 2006, 01:51:21 PM

cutler fans argue the same thing all day long,.... someone please post a few front double bi comparo's between ronnie and dorian... im in for a good laugh

here ya go:

pumpster · « **Reply #10905 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:06:56 PM »

pumpster · « **Reply #10906 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:09:46 PM »

Washboard abs don't help when you're W-I-D-E..

Hulkster · « **Reply #10907 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:13:35 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on October 30, 2006, 05:39:59 AM

Unforntunately, I can't find any rear relaxed shot like this of Yates from 93, which would be a better comparison since he was at his best. Ronnie's shot is from the 2001AC, I would have liked to get a rear relaxed shot from 99 for him.

here are two relaxed shot of him in 99 spreading his lats.

but they are not very close up. Still, they highlight the taper dorian never had.

I really don't see what is so impressive about having such a wide back if your waist is almost as wide:

$:-\$

but apparently,the dorian fans cream their tiny jock straps over this.

the AC Ronnie shot is impressive for detail, but he is scrunching up his shoulders to show off his detail, not spreading his lats just yet.

sculpture · « **Reply #10908 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:14:53 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 30, 2006, 02:04:37 PM

here ya go:

Dillet looks incredible from that angle.

Look at the difference in quality, shape, size and fullness in his arms compared to yates.

Notice the fantastic shaped quads.

sculpture · « **Reply #10909 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:16:32 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 30, 2006, 02:13:35 PM

here are two relaxed shot of him in 99 spreading his lats.

but they are not very close up. Still, they highlight the taper dorian never had.

I really don't see what is so impressive about having such a wide back if your waist is almost as wide:

$:-\$

but apparently,the dorian fans cream their tiny jock straps over this.

the AC Ronnie shot is impressive for detail, but he is scrunching up his shoulders to show off his detail, not spreading his lats just yet.

Excellant post.

The more i see of ronnie 99, the more i consider it not only his best presentation. but probably the best of all time.

pumpster · « **Reply #10910 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:19:03 PM »

Against a couple of excellent BBs Coleman's still way out in front:

pumpster · « **Reply #10911 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:19:56 PM »

This on the other hand looks like a bricklayer or noseguard.

Hulkster · « **Reply #10912 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:20:22 PM »

Quote from: sculpture on October 30, 2006, 02:16:32 PM

Excellant post.

The more i see of ronnie 99, the more i consider it not only his best presentation. but probably the best of all time.

there are many many people that agree with you, including me.

there are only 3 in known history thus far that consider Dorian to be better

while on this topic, I just had to post this again, it is fucking hilarious:

the arm comparison is the greatest thing EVER!

pobrecito · « **Reply #10913 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:21:51 PM »

Ronnie was better in 98 than 99. Way drier.

pumpster · « **Reply #10914 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:22:08 PM »

Hulkster · « **Reply #10915 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:25:59 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on October 30, 2006, 02:21:51 PM

Ronnie was better in 98 than 99. Way drier.

hmmm.. but did he have the fullness and ripped quads?

from what I have seen from 98, his quads were soft compared to 99

compare these two double bis. To me, Ronnie looks a lot better with a little more muscle on his frame.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #10916 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:31:26 PM »

one of my fav pics of Ronnie (I believe it's from 99)

pumpster · « **Reply #10917 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:37:05 PM »

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10918 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:48:41 PM »

Neo how you think 2003 Coleman equals Dorian 1995 on conditioning is beyond me , look at these pics 2001 ASC vs 2003 Olympia his conditioning isn't even on par with this nevermind Yates .

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #10919 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:50:51 PM »

oh, look at that pic of Dorian. He's obviously holding a layer of water under his skin. Compare that pic to the pic of Ronnie hitting a most muscualr. Dorian's conditioning is not as good.

pobrecito · « **Reply #10920 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:51:33 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 30, 2006, 02:25:59 PM

hmmm.. but did he have the fullness and ripped quads?

from what I have seen from 98, his quads were soft compared to 99

compare these two double bis. To me, Ronnie looks a lot better with a little more muscle on his frame.

nothing was soft on ronnie in 98. However, his quads were more cut in 99. He was simply just drier in 98. Everything looked sucked to the bone, moreso than in 99.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10921 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:52:58 PM »

Not even close , Dorian rapes Ronnie 2003 in terms of dryness ! and you can't use the excuse he's not flexing either !

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10922 on:** October 30, 2006, 02:53:53 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on October 30, 2006, 02:51:33 PM

nothing was soft on ronnie in 98. However, his quads were more cut in 99. He was simply just drier in 98. Everything looked sucked to the bone, moreso than in 99.

Thats because he was almost 10lbs lighter ! in some pics he looks better in 98 and other 99

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10923 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:02:34 PM »

Ronnie 03 Yates 95 Sorry but Ronnie isn't even close in dryness.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10924 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:03:49 PM »

Even at 240lbs Ronnie looked pregnant !! what a freaking joke.