Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3504744 times)

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #10925 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:07:47 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 30, 2006, 02:52:58 PM

Not even close , Dorian rapes Ronnie 2003 in terms of dryness !

pumpster · « **Reply #10926 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:12:13 PM »

Coleman clearly with the greater taper. Washboard's a nice diversion from the blocky obliques & structure, for those afraid of the truth.. $:-\$

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10927 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:13:27 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on October 30, 2006, 03:07:47 PM

2003 Ronnie is NOT I repeat NOT dry all over , hell just look at Ronnie 98 vs 2003 , nevermind Yates at his best .

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10928 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:16:10 PM »

Owned................... ....next.

Hulkster · « **Reply #10929 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:21:59 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 30, 2006, 03:03:49 PM

Even at 240lbs Ronnie looked pregnant !! what a freaking joke.

Ronnie was not 240 pounds at the AC.

he was listed at 247 to 250 depending on the source.

in other words, your comments are 7 to 10 pounds off

gut or no gut, pose for pose he looked better at the AC than Dorian ever did.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #10930 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:22:30 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 30, 2006, 03:13:27 PM

2003 Ronnie is NOT I repeat NOT dry all over , hell just look at Ronnie 98 vs 2003 , nevermind Yates at his best .

They look the same conditioning to me (personally I think Ronnie looks better there).

Hulkster · « **Reply #10931 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:24:28 PM »

as you all know, I do prefer the 99 version of Ronnie to the 2003 version.

however, that rear lat spread is by far and above the best ever seen on stage

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #10932 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:26:41 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 30, 2006, 03:16:10 PM

Owned.......................next.

suuuure, you compared a high-quality, close-up B&W pic of Dorian to a blurry, distant color pic of Ronnie. Real fair comparison.

Hulkster · « **Reply #10933 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:28:04 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on October 30, 2006, 03:22:30 PM

They look the same conditioning to me.

of course they do.

that because the whole "dorian is so much better conditioned than Ronnie" is nothing more than a falsehood:

we have all seen enough pics and videos by now to see that it is total bullshit.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #10934 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:30:29 PM »

here's a better abs-and-thighs comparison. I'm not saying Ronnie beats Dorian, but he definately holds his own in Dorian's strongest pose.

carvedoutofwood · « **Reply #10935 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:31:45 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on October 30, 2006, 03:22:30 PM

They look the same conditioning to me (personally I think Ronnie looks better there).

honestly, and it might sound crazy... but i think ND confuses bad skin for dryness... dorian aside from being by far the ugliest Mr. O... had easily some of the worst skin in its history... ronnie on the otherhand, had flawless skin, which may make it seem like he's smooth in comparo's... but in reality he's just better in yet another way

Hulkster · « **Reply #10936 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:33:44 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on October 30, 2006, 03:26:41 PM

suuuure, you compared a high-quality, close-up B&W pic of Dorian to a blurry, distant color pic of Ronnie. Real fair comparison.

not only that, ND refuses to show Dorian's national-level quads!

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10937 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:34:45 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 30, 2006, 03:21:59 PM

Ronnie was not 240 pounds at the AC.

he was listed at 247 to 250 depending on the source.

in other words, your comments are 7 to 10 pounds off

gut or no gut, pose for pose he looked better at the AC than Dorian ever did.

I meant in the 240s noty 240 exactly , Oh boy Yates crushes Ronnie in most of the mandatories at his best.

Hulkster · « **Reply #10938 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:35:05 PM »

Quote from: carvedoutofwood on October 30, 2006, 03:31:45 PM

honestly, and it might sound crazy... but i think ND confuses bad skin for dryness... dorian aside from being by far the ugliest Mr. O... had easily some of the worst skin in its history... ronnie on the otherhand, had flawless skin, which may make it seem like he's smooth in comparo's... but in reality he's just better in yet another way

hahahahaha

that was beautiful.

carvedoutofwood · « **Reply #10939 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:35:57 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 30, 2006, 03:35:05 PM

hahahahaha

that was beautiful.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10940 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:36:04 PM »

Quote from: carvedoutofwood on October 30, 2006, 03:31:45 PM

honestly, and it might sound crazy... but i think ND confuses bad skin for dryness... dorian aside from being by far the ugliest Mr. O... had easily some of the worst skin in its history... ronnie on the otherhand, had flawless skin, which may make it seem like he's smooth in comparo's... but in reality he's just better in yet another way

Should I say bitch tits? and Dorian's dryness is legendary only a complete idiot would try and deny that , hey wait Hulkster did lol

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10941 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:37:21 PM »

2001 oh yes his best ever lol a fucking-aesthetic materpiece lol

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10942 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:40:09 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on October 30, 2006, 03:30:29 PM

here's a better abs-and-thighs comparison. I'm not saying Ronnie beats Dorian, but he definately holds his own in Dorian's strongest pose.

and that pic is from 1996 OBVIOUSLY NOT his best and he still wastes Ronnie.

Hulkster · « **Reply #10943 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:42:40 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on October 30, 2006, 03:34:45 PM

I meant in the 240s noty 240 exactly , Oh boy Yates crushes Ronnie in most of the mandatories at his best.

according to you and almost no one else.

why should we believe you?

pobrecito · « **Reply #10944 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:45:18 PM »

Man, Kevin had the best side chest shot!

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10945 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:46:29 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on October 30, 2006, 03:42:40 PM

according to you and almost no one else.

why should we believe you?

Why should you believe me? because unlike you I'm honest and objective , and I know more about bodybuilding than you do ( bviously ) I know what the IFBB judging criteria is and how to critique an athlete's physique and you don't in general I'm a lot more savy about competitive bodybuilding .

Hell you can't even post an accurate comparision because you're scared to with good reason too.

Hulkster · « **Reply #10946 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:47:56 PM »

more shots of dorian's "ab and I don't want to show my quad because it sucks" pose

ND, face facts:

Dorian's ab and thigh has the major flaw of not having fantastic quads.

Ronnie does, even though his abs are crappy.

The judges would probably call it even.

interesting "front row" comparison.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #10947 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:49:56 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on October 30, 2006, 03:45:18 PM

Man, Kevin had the best side chest shot!

He is easily beating Flex and Ronnie in that pic but Hulkster doesn't even know it lol Ronnie's whole sidechest shot is dominated by his overdeveloped front & side delts which make his pecs in that shot look small , not to mention he can't even properly pull it off , Hulkster sees a collection of great looking parts in the pose and mistakes it for a great side chest shot , Levrone has this shot covered , notice he's extending his calf and Ronnie is hiding twigs for a good reason.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #10948 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:50:49 PM »

ND again with the B&W pics of Dorian.

Hulkster · « **Reply #10949 on:** October 30, 2006, 03:51:04 PM »

gee, a close up so as not to reveal size/balance issues and gee, a black and white shot.

oh, and he is alone too.

how predictable