SUCKY requires repetition-i've been saying that over and over again, finally on page 455 he gets it. Here's the other part you still don't comprehend: Coleman's physically wider AND has a smaller waist = superior taper.
No, Coleman only has better taper when he's standing relaxed from the front. That's it. In the abs-and-thigh, Dorian has better taper, because the
differential between his lats and waist is greater. Do you need me to repeat it again?
In the front lat spread, Dorian has better taper, because the
differential between his lats and waist is greater. Do I need to repeat this again? Dorian's overrall taper is as good as Ronnie's in the relaxed round, becauuse Ronnie's waist is smaller from the front, but gigger from the sides. Do you need me to repeat that again?
You make the mistake of assuming thatg taper is a static quality that is always apparent. Wrong. Ronnie only has the advantage in taper from one angle, when standing relaxed. Do you want me to repeat that again? Coleman is
not is not physically wider, except when you see him from the front and standind relaxed. In this case, the differential between his shoulders and waist is greater than Dorian's. Do you want me to repeat that again?
Back to the clip you've deliberately ignored. Let me know if it's difficult to see Coleman's bis from the back, genius..3:50 mark.
[/quote]
Again, irrelevant, because the biceps is not that visible from the back as it is from the front. And what's your point? Dorian wins by having the thicker and wider back with at least as many separations. His hams are as good as Ronnie's. His glutes are smaller - a good thing from a symmetry standpoint. Overrall, Dorian wins this shot. Do you want me to repeat that again?
The biceps is not the focus in that pose because most of the biceps mass is only visible from the front, and there are far more muscles to be seen in the back double biceps than in the front version. Do you want me to repaet that? Once again, for the gazillionth time, you got
owned.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
