I was quoting Peter McGough. I never said Ronnie's lats were bigger in 99. So I don't know what the hell you are rambling about.
Actually, there weren't even "as" big...

I agree that "best" is a matter of opinion. However, if we establish a set of judging criteria such as size, shape, separation and detail, we see that Ronnie has better parts.
Completely wrong. "Shape", separations and details are not, I repeat, not, a part of an official bodybuilding judging criteria. The judges might reward things like vascualrity, striations and separations as part of conditioning. Or they might not. Regardless, Dorian's superior hardness more than makes up for any siubjective lack of "details" you might come up with. Furthermore, Dorian never won contests, necessarily, because he was had more details: he won because he was more muscular&symmetrical from more angles while contracting different angles. Period. Dillet had superb vascularity, details, etc, was 20 lbs heavier and it didn't do shit against the titan known as Dorian Yates.
SUCKMYMUSCLE