too bad the pics show otherwise.
No, they don't. They clearly show that Dorian's gut was infinitely smaller than Ronnie's in 2003
you did dumbass. You said Dorian's arms were 51 or 52 cm. All I did was convert it to inches.
Ok, 52.5 centimeters. How much is that, retard?
My god you are f*cking dumb. I can care less if you find where most lat growth occurs irrelevant. The fact of the matter is that the upper part of the lats, where the width is measured, don't grow more than 3-4 inches per side.
It doesen't matter, retard, because that's where a bodybuilder's lat width is measured. Does the lat spread wider in the upper part or the lower part? Duh! It doesen't matter if it grows 1 inch, 1 milimeter or one meter,
the bottom line is that where the most muscle tissue is added too is irrelevant. The rear lat spread evaluates lat width, and Dorian had more of it than Ronnie did in 1999. You make it seem like 3-4 inches is little, when in reality it is a huge increase in lat width. You can add 20 lbs of muscle tissue to you lats and you'd still not gain 4 inches to each side. Nice try, idiot.
you completely missed the point of my analogy. I was not substituting the arms for lats in terms of muscle shape. I was demonstrating how any muscle, regardless of shape, experiences the least absolute growth closest to the insertion.
It doesen't matter, because this analogy does not apply to the lats. Why? Due to the positioning of the tendons. In the case of the biceps, the two tendons are in the same plane, so the middle part that grows the most in terms of muscle tissue is also the one that sticks out the most. The lats, conversely, always protrude more near the upper tendon because it is situated further out than the lower one. Do you understand this? Should I repeat myself again? Where the most muscle tissue is added has no relevance in the case of measuring lat width.
b/c they are smarter than to toss around the term "owned."
The Coleman side? They toss the word around all the time; they just don't think you've owned anyone.
unfortunately, your posts are full of shit.
My posts are fucking brilliant. And I don't make dumb assertions, like that somehow where the most muscle tissue is added to the lats is somehow relevant to evaluating the width of the lats. Or that 3-4 inches of lat width increase is not much, when in reality is a monstrous increase in size. You tried, and failed miserably. Your arguments are shit.
Your insults are lame
Yeah, ok. Let''s see. You called me "suckmydick", "dipshit", "dumbass". Wow! Have you ever considered doing stand-up comedy? With that incredible sarcasm of yours you would be the man!
and your math is poor for an elementary student.
Such as your math, which tells you that an increase of 4 inches in lat width to the sides is little...?
When you feel overwhelmed by others who make you look dumb, you threaten them via personal messages, wish cancer upon them or call them a "turd." Now go back to playing in your sand box little kid.
Yeah, that's probably the reason why you call everyone a "dipshit". And why you called me "suckmydick" and "little kid".
And of all the people who've posted at this thread, you're the one who's the easiest to own. I have received over a dozen PMs congratulating me for the brutal way I've owned you and that you are unable to reply to even a single one of my posts. There are intelligent posters in the Coleman side, like PraetorFenix, but you're not one of them.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
