Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[pumpster]

Coleman is still the ugliest man in bodybuilding.

Why, do you want to date BBs? As usual, no one in "camp Yates" bothers to explain anything, who needs proof?  Coleman's not ugly compared to a bricklayer.

[Hulkster]

you still think bodybuilder A will beat bodybuilder B because he has a better taper lol or bigger arms or more ' lumpiness ' and " X-frame "

by themselves these things won't win you a contest.

but put them all together on one physique and you have a multitude of advantages over another that the judges DO look for and DO score.

hence, why Ronnie has been so dominant since peaking.

[IceCold]

You want me to name the boards?

Bodybuilding dungeon.
Mayhem
Everyone on getbig who does not post in this thread.

there.

Of course 99 flex never called Ronnie untouchable! do you know how big Flex's EGO was at that point in  his career?  In his rookie year, it was a lot different.

no, it proves how much of a predetermined notion that the judges had of Dorian's phyisque - which is a really bad, non-impartial thing to do.  Conscientious judges would never do something like that.

and you are ignoring his comments following the 2003 olympia...

mostly wrong about mayhem.

i post there as well.  

there may be some or more to say that ronnie is better, but to say yates was overrated is retarted.

once again 2 different things.

so flex attitude was different in than in 93.  you dont think winning your first 4 pro shows with perfect scores will enlarge an ego when in 99 he only competed in the olympia.  

predetermined notion?  

then why with many mutliple winners - haney, arnold, and even coleman has that never happened too?  

esp. arnold and coleman considering how popular arnold was and no other real competition and the fact that haney and ronnie had 8 years worth of wiins behind them.  

besides, this was only dorian's 2nd apperance at the olympia.  no like he was dominant for many years before that.  

flex made comments about ronnie in 03, but he still never said that he counld not beat him at his best.  

flex never said he could be dorian and in fact withdrew in 97.

nice try hulkster.  

 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Yates has a better OVERALL shot notice how calves complete the pose? Oh no you wouldn't because most of your shots are waist up lol and look how pathetic Coleman's lowerlegs are

[pumpster]

  Yes, and Dorian is bigger, because: they're about the same height, weight the same, and yet Dorian is drier.

  But Black Men have a higher mineral bone density than White Men, so Ronnie's skeleton could be heavier than Dorian's despite the latter having bigger bones. All things considered, odds are that Dorian carried more laen mass because they were about the same height, same wieght and yet Dorian had less sub-cutaneous water. Ergo = more mass. You didn't see that coming, huh, Poopster?

SUCKMYMUSCLE

The theories SUCKY comes up with are highly entertaining in their delusions...Yates is bigger because he's drier? Sheer idiocy..

Higher mineral bone density? hahahahahahahah

[IceCold]

by themselves these things won't win you a contest.

but put them all together on one physique and you have a multitude of advantages over another that the judges DO look for and DO score.

hence, why Ronnie has been so dominant since peaking.

against who?

gunter and gustavo - both by the way beat coleman since he became mr. olympia.

have coleman competed against an 'in prime' levrone, flex, shawn, nasser, and paul and then see what happens.

besides in 98, despite ronnie's dryest and leanest condition on stage, with the best his back has ever looked, he still barely beat flex, who was off.  

[pumpster]

Pumpster just got his ass beat down !! great post !!

Since when has ND had good judgement? hahaahahahahah

[NarcissisticDeity]

by themselves these things won't win you a contest.

but put them all together on one physique and you have a multitude of advantages over another that the judges DO look for and DO score.

hence, why Ronnie has been so dominant since peaking.

Why do you type? you always get yourself in trouble lol he hasn't been DOMINANT since peaking in fact he only dominated 3 times since he did ' peak ' most of his wins were close calls , damn close calls , and he lost to Gunther 2002 , Jay 2006 , Challenge round in 2005 , and why does Ronnie have close calls? why does he always seem to get into trouble? because of conditioning something Yates defined and you vastly underestimate Dorian's overwhelming advantages , try as you may you can't rid him of them.

[pumpster]

  This is not relevant, because they're facing the cameras from different angles and they have different waist sizes, which affects the perception of lat width. The bottom line is that visual evaluation of physiques is far from accurate.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

WRONG; all your excuses are unproven. Face it, you just tried measuring their backs on that video and didn't like the answer. hahaahahahahaah

[NarcissisticDeity]

Since when has ND had good judgement? hahaahahahahah

Oh please you post pics of 97 Olympia and act like its an accomplishment you got your ass handed to you time and time again on this and other threads lol can anyone say

Bow Flex?

[carvedoutofwood]

I don't think that Coleman is owning Yates in your comparisons and Coleman is still the ugliest man in bodybuilding.

your the only person who agrees with that statement... yates is by far the ugliest mr. o ever... and nearly tied with dillet, kamali, and ruhl for ugliest bb ever.... talk about a crator faced toothless brit... sorry but theres no debate... on the upside... you gues do have kate moss

[NarcissisticDeity]

The theories SUCKY comes up with are highly entertaining in their delusions...Yates is bigger because he's drier? Sheer idiocy..

Higher mineral bone density? hahahahahahahah

If they both weigh 257 pounds and one is dryer who has more actual muscle? 

[Hulkster]

have coleman competed against an 'in prime' levrone, flex, shawn, nasser, and paul and then see what happens.

it has happened. they would lose:




Would Ronnie in his 2002 shape beat a prime shawn, flex or kevin? probably not.

but then again, Dorian in his 94 or 96 shape should have lost as well.

BOTH Ronnie and Dorian looked really good at their bests, and really bad at their worst.

[pumpster]

arms, yes.

however, ronnie's arms are nowhere near as impressive as dorian's in the side tricep shot, although ronnie has better arms.  kinda strange.

Pretty close; i'll explain the difference since you're a novice: Yates has extreme separation and definition in the medial and lateral heads, which is why he looks good on the side tri pose. Howerver, given the overall lack of size, no one's been able to come up with a single Yates tri shot that looks good outside of side tri. You're welcome for the education. 

[NarcissisticDeity]

it has happened. they would lose:




Would Ronnie in his 2002 shape beat a prime shawn, flex or kevin? probably not.

but then again, Dorian in his 94 or 96 shape should have lost as well.

BOTH Ronnie and Dorian looked really good at their bests, and really bad at their worst.

Only you have this delusion that 1994 Yates was terrible lol Flex magazines 15 most shocking moments in bodybuilding history

one of them was the 2001 Mr Olympia NOT the 1994 Mr Olympia 

[pumpster]

i've conceded nothing other than you have provided no real evidence or proof to support your claims in 642 pages.

you've lied saying you did and referenced those pages.  i checked and nothing is there. 

you really have contributed nothing to this thread and in fact made it harder for hulkster and co. to get their points across bc of your remarks that make no sense with no proof and trying to use unusual words to make it sound like you know what your talking about. 

based on the remarks you made before, you sounded like you had years of experience in judging physiques and really knows what happens at a bodybuilding show.  your continous comments on discrediting the scores and political remarks - despite never providing evidence (remember when you said you did on page 100 - nothing is anywhere near that page) proof your ignorance about bodybuilding.

when in fact, you dont even work out at a gym.  sounds strange for a self proclaimed expert (your judging criteria comments) and IFBB insider (you must be for all your political remarks).

when in reality, you are just another fag who is too shy and self conscious to even go to a gym.  instead you use a bowflex and act like you are ronnie coleman training in metroflex as you slap on another rod of resistance. 

MELTDOWN.. .. ..


The comments about working out at home and the bowflex are priceless. Desperate personal attacks as he loses every point. haahahahahaahah

FYI Coleman also has a home gym, genius. 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Pretty close; i'll explain the difference since you're a novice: Yates has extreme separation and definition in the medial and lateral heads, which is why he looks good on the side tri pose. Howerver, given the overall lack of size, no one's been able to come up with a single Yates tri shot that looks good outside of side tri. You're welcome for the education. 

Lack of size? lol neither are a side tricep shot and his triceps look outstanding !!

[NarcissisticDeity]

MELTDOWN.. .. ..

BEATDOWN is more like it[/size]

[Hulkster]

Only you have this delusion that 1994 Yates was terrible

read any non-weider mag from around the time and you will see that they agree.

both ironman and musclemag were not very supportive of Dorian in 1994 or 1996 and if I recall, 1997 as well.

Weider mags from the mid 90's would never ever badmouth their champ.

[pumpster]

Lack of size? lol neither are a side tricep shot and his triceps look outstanding !!

ND recycling; he already conceeded the size difference hundreds of pages ago following plenty of proof.

[carvedoutofwood]

Lack of size? lol neither are a side tricep shot and his triceps look outstanding !!

that isnt dryness its BACNE.... there is no avoiding those gross bumps.... ND, address this, what are those bumps if not bacne"

[pumpster]

that isnt dryness its BACNE.... there is no avoiding those gross bumps.... ND, address this, what are those bumps if not bacne"

You're forgetting that ND's attracted to white BBs, bacne or not.


This is for ND: check out the boils on the 6-pack.  MONSTER TRIS & BIS.

[NarcissisticDeity]

read any non-weider mag from around the time and you will see that they agree.

both ironman and musclemag were not very supportive of Dorian in 1994 or 1996 and if I recall, 1997 as well.

Weider mags from the mid 90's would never ever badmouth their champ.

I have all the mags from the Olympia contests and I posted a lot of quotes from Ironaman that contradict your BS

[NarcissisticDeity]

ND recycling; he already conceeded the size difference hundreds of pages ago following plenty of proof.

When your challenge is answered typical pumpster you run for cover .

[pumpster]

I have all the mags from the Olympia contests and I posted a lot of quotes from Ironaman that contradict your BS

Can you imagine his place? Filled to the ceilings with men's mags & posters.