Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[pobrecito]

A torn bicep from the back double bi doesn't count? A torn bicep from a most muscular doesn't count?

Answer my above question please. Have you seen any defending Mr. Olympia win the title with a severely torn muscle? If you have any pictures please post?

Has any other Mr. Olympia looked this good and been this dominant? - NO!

Dorian was 255lbs at the 95 Mr. Olympia - nobody would have said a word if he had claimed to be 280.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Stop running from the question. I said any defending Mr. Olympia ever had a "major torn muscle? and still won? You said "under developed". I'd rather have under developed calves than a major torn bicep.

I said before and I'll say again. Coleman with a GH gut should never win. but I'd rather have a little gyno than a major torn bicep.

"Quote Jim Rockell one of the chair of the I.F.B.B. Judging committe on Dorian at the 1994 Mr Olympia"
lol, I'm not surprised, a quote from the "IFBB", LOL. Ask the true fans on what they think of a torn bicep.

"Added Rockell: Dorian had a slight injury but as far as I'm concerned, it had NO bearing whatsoever"
Slight injury? I think not. A one armed man is not a slight injury. Just another biased comment by the IFBB.

You're mellowdramatic about the bicep because it fits your agenda , points to ponder Dorian didn't have the greatest biceps to begin with , two he's NOT a " one armed man " one bicep is shorter than the other

and its NOT a matter of what you would rather have its a matter of whats more of a liability , a torn bicep thats only visible in one pose , or undersized , underdeveloped poor shaped calves that can be seen in EVERY SINGLE mandatory pose . get serious .

And if you don't think Coleman should have been Mr Olympia with a GH gut then he never deserved any of his Sandows because he's been sporting that gut since day one.

[Iceman1981]

Has any other Mr. Olympia looked this good and been this dominant? - NO!

Dorian was 255lbs at the 95 Mr. Olympia - nobody would have said a word if he had claimed to be 280.

Actually, YES. THIS

You didn't answer my 2 question in my last post.

Look my friend. I did not say he didn't look good. I said he should not have won with a torn bicep. Just to remind you again. Answer my question I posted above.Have you seen any defending Mr. Olympia win the title with a severely torn muscle? If you have any pictures please post?

[Hulkster]

never said " arms hardly mean anything in bodybuilding " thats your pathetic attempt to make shit up because as usual you have nothing for me .

yes but your friend Pubic did.

you guys are basically on the same level of delusion anyway.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Actually, YES. THIS

You didn't answer my 2 question in my last post.

Look my friend. I did not say he didn't look good. I said he should not have won with a torn bicep. Just to remind you again. Answer my question I posted above.Have you seen any defending Mr. Olympia win the title with a severely torn muscle? If you have any pictures please post?

No no other Mr Olympia has won with a torn bicep

[Iceman1981]

You're mellowdramatic about the bicep because it fits your agenda , points to ponder Dorian didn't have the greatest biceps to begin with , two he's NOT a " one armed man " one bicep is shorter than the other

and its NOT a matter of what you would rather have its a matter of whats more of a liability , a torn bicep thats only visible in one pose , or undersized , underdeveloped poor shaped calves that can be seen in EVERY SINGLE mandatory pose . get serious .

And if you don't think Coleman should have been Mr Olympia with a GH gut then he never deserved any of his Sandows because he's been sporting that gut since day one.

lol, and Yates never had a gut? I think he did. So did he deserve to win?

A torn bicep is not only in 1 visible pose. It's in the back double bi, most muscular, front relaxed, front lat spread, side chest. You can't run from a torn bicep like what Yates had.

[NarcissisticDeity]

yes but your friend Pubic did.

you guys are basically on the same level of delusion anyway.

I'd rather be lumped in with him and sucky than pumpster lol

[Iceman1981]

No no other Mr Olympia has won with a torn bicep

Thanks for the answer.

[pobrecito]

The fact of the matter is an IFBB judge said it wasn't an issue.

Therefore, I could care less what you say about it.

The same judges that judged Haney were the same ones that judged Dorian and the same judged Ronnie. Therefore, until you can empirically prove there was some sort of "politics" or rigging of the contest, I give ultimate credibility to the actions and quotes of those judges.

Your argument therefore is deemed insignificant.

[NarcissisticDeity]

lol, and Yates never had a gut? I think he did. So did he deserve to win?

A torn bicep is not only in 1 visible pose. It's in the back double bi, most muscular, front relaxed, front lat spread, side chest. You can't run from a torn bicep like what Yates had.

Now you're entering the danger zone , a torn bicep cannot be seen in the back double biceps , front relaxed , front latspread , side chest you're full of it now.

[Hulkster]

Would you consider a man with TWO underdevloped , unbalanced and poor shaped calves the greatest body in the world? now add in bitch tits and a GH Gut and you have Ronnie 98/99 and this is supposed to be the best he's ever looked !!

1. dorian had a GH gut in 93 at his best too. Everyone keeps telling and showing you this but you just keep ignoring them

2. having a particular bodypart not up to the incredible standards of your other ones is NOT the same as having a physcially deformed, torn and atrophied muscle. And on the arms no less, the symbol of bodybuilding itself.

Compare:

which stands out more:

[NarcissisticDeity]

The fact of the matter is an IFBB judge said it wasn't an issue.

Therefore, I could care less what you say about it.

The same judges that judged Haney were the same ones that judged Dorian and the same judged Ronnie. Therefore, until you can empirically prove there was some sort of "politics" or rigging of the contest, I give ultimate credibility to the actions and quotes of those judges.

Your argument therefore is deemed insignificant.

I laugh when anyone mentions politics and Yates , he was a complete unknown when he stepped into the IFBB he had zero coverage in the magazines , he didn't have any momentum going for him , he competed once a year and disappeared back to the UK , he entered the IFBB under very un-favorable conditions and still was a clear cut winner right from the beginning , his first contest was a close second , his first Olympia he he out muscled Lee Haney and beat him in the muscularity round despite being being 10 pounds lighter .

Yates let his physique do the talking for him .

[NarcissisticDeity]

1. dorian had a GH gut in 93 at his best too. Everyone keeps telling and showing you this but you just keep ignoring them

2. having a particular bodypart not up to the incredible standards of your other ones is NOT the same as having a physcially deformed, torn and atrophied muscle. And on the arms no less, the symbol of bodybuilding itself.

Compare:

which stands out more:

Again the bicep can ONLY be seen in one mandatory pose and thats the front double bicep pose Ronnie weak pathetic lightweight calves can be clearly seen in every single mandatory pose.

you can't escape this.

[Iceman1981]

Now you're entering the danger zone , a torn bicep cannot be seen in the back double biceps , front relaxed , front latspread , side chest you're full of it now.

In your opinion it's not noticable you can't see it.

Yates had a gut for last few years of his career. did he deserve to win?

I'll see you guy later.

[pobrecito]

1. dorian had a GH gut in 93 at his best too. Everyone keeps telling and showing you this but you just keep ignoring them

2. having a particular bodypart not up to the incredible standards of your other ones is NOT the same as having a physcially deformed, torn and atrophied muscle. And on the arms no less, the symbol of bodybuilding itself.

Compare:

which stands out more:

How about this pea sized/syntholed calf? Does it stand out?

[IceCold]

Ronnie almost lost in 2001. He was not given a  perfect score.

Yates could show up looking like a fat out of shape gorilla and he would still be given perfect...

thats the crucial difference that you guys are too dense to comprehend...

The judges were accurate during Ronnie's reign. In the close contests where Ronnie showed up in off shape, he was marked down for it.

When dorian showed up in off shape, the judges didn't care.

that is where you are wrong.

yates never showed up out of shape.  

he was always the hardest and dryest in the show.

ronnie did show up out of shape a few years.

that's the difference.

owned again hulkster.

[Hulkster]

Now you're entering the danger zone , a torn bicep cannot be seen in the back double biceps , front relaxed , front latspread , side chest you're full of it now.

wrong on all counts:

[NarcissisticDeity]

In your opinion it's not noticable you can't see it.

Yates had a gut for last few years of his career. did he deserve to win?

I'll see you guy later.

1997 Yates did NOT deserve to win in my opinion. every other year yes.

[NarcissisticDeity]

wrong on all counts:

LMFAO kid you're getting desperate again

[NarcissisticDeity]

where is the torn bicep? I remember when I first posted this your cried morphed lol

[pobrecito]

0 calf development.

[Hulkster]

yates never showed up out of shape.  

LOL

so this is "in shape" :

Yates was certainly not in shape (compared to 93) in 1994.

Its like saying Ronnie was in shape in 2001 or 2002.

he wasn't if you compare his 2001/2002 form to his 1998/1999 one

[NarcissisticDeity]

I don't see a torn bicep

[pobrecito]

Ronnie trying to emulate his superior

[Iceman1981]

The fact of the matter is an IFBB judge said it wasn't an issue.

Therefore, I could care less what you say about it.

The same judges that judged Haney were the same ones that judged Dorian and the same judged Ronnie. Therefore, until you can empirically prove there was some sort of "politics" or rigging of the contest, I give ultimate credibility to the actions and quotes of those judges.

Your argument therefore is deemed insignificant.

ooooh "The fact of the matter is an IFBB judge said it wasn't an issue"

most bodybuilders know that the IFBB  judeges are the biggest crooks around.

Just because your boy won Mr. O, you're backing the IFBB, but if he didn't win, you would know how the IFBB operates and know the real truth. It seems like you're the only one right about the IFBB judges and the millions of true fans are wrong. Any bodybuilder or judge that seriously bad talks the IFBB with the media will get his contract terminated by Joe. You think the judges or any bodybuilder would risk their job stating what really should of happened? and who really should of won? or what really is going? It has been going since Larry Scott all the way up to Coleman so please save me from the all of the bs.