sure, go back to hiding under Dorian's desk you little f*ggot. I have provided evidence to back up all my comments to you in this thread. The only thing you know how to do is disagree with me. It's amusing to watch you squirm like an anal virgin getting penetrated for the first time. "What? I never lied" even though I posted the exact quotes where you did. 
I alred said that was not a lie, but a simple misquote, you fucktard son of a c.u.n.t. The same for the conversion from inches to centimeters. Go milk Ronnie's balls like all the other ones of your ilk, you muscle queen. Only a muscle queen who has a size fetiche would think Ronnie's bloated, distended 2003 vesion was his best.
I only disagree with you? Ha ha ha ha...sure. That's probably te reason why my posts are the longest of all and I'm the only one here who elucidates every point I make in detail. Your posts are pthetic. You can't argue with me because you're too stupid, so you resort to picking at straws, like brininging up the fact that I missed a conversion by one centimeter. Fuck you. You should be shot because you''re not worthy of the oxygen you breath. You had the nerve to challenge me to an intellectual debate and got an expanded asshole as a result. You're even dumber at metaphysics and philosophy than you are at bodybuilding.
I tried to listen to what you had to say on bodybuilding and your arguments suck. Your knowledge of bodybuilding is sophomoric and and you don't even understand something as basic as how the symmetry round and the mandatories are evaluated. I'm willing to bet, also, that you think Ruhl is a better bodybuilder than Levrone on virtue of eing bigger. That's the whole evaluation process that little bumb shits like you do: see who has the greater muscle diameter. You say outrageous things, like tat Ronnie had lats as wide as Dorian's in 1999, without poviding any evidence, and this despite the fact that until 2003 all magazine writers considered Dorian's lats te widest and thickest ever. Or worse, you say that Coleman's gut was under control in 2003, when in reality it was visible even when standing relaxed from the front! Your arguments are shit. You suck. You even have the stupidity to say that the inner ticeps head is relevant in any way in the relaxed and rear lat poses, when in reality only the back part of it is visible. Why did I spent my precious time arguing with a dud like you?
SUCKMYMUSCLE
