Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Hulkster]

ever notice how there are about 500 pics of Ronnie's back looking amazing, and there is only ONE shot of dorian where his back double bi actually looks really good?

says alot right there.

[Hulkster]

I have to wonder how famous those dorian shot would have been had they been shot in colour...

[NarcissisticDeity]

I have to wonder how famous those dorian shot would have been had they been shot in colour...

Oh yes they would suck lol

[NarcissisticDeity]

ever notice how there are about 500 pics of Ronnie's back looking amazing, and there is only ONE shot of dorian where his back double bi actually looks really good?

says alot right there.

You don't think Dorian's back double bicep looks amazing then you have issues , you can't see his biceps as well as Ronnies so that means Dorian's pose sucks lol this crushes Ronnie.

[Hulkster]

Oh yes they would suck lol

well, they certainly would have lost most of their impact, thats for sure.

[Hulkster]

yeah, sure

[Hulkster]

as we can see 98 ronnie is killing 95 dorian in a similar pose...

[NarcissisticDeity]

well, they certainly would have lost most of their impact, thats for sure.

To you maybe , but you don't like Yates .


all color and all extremely impressive you really can't counter an argument against these

[NarcissisticDeity]

yeah, sure

He's comparable until you get to the calves and lower lats & lower back , and Ronnie's overdeveloped glutes , you see what you want to see.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Dorian's back didn't look good for size or width so much as conditioning and hardness.  Size wise he simply cannot match up with Big Ron.

This statement shows how little you know , when the best back is brought up its usually Yates & Coleman , so by virtue of both names coming up already they match-up

what seperates Dorian from Ronnie is better lower lats and lower back , these are two areas that Ronnie can't match up with Yates and he is comparable in all other areas.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Yes, Dorian has him beat in those two areas, but Ronnie isn't "comparable" to Dorian in all other areas - that statement is untrue.  Ronnie definitely has Dorian beat in pretty well every other area.

No he doesn't again you're highlighting your ignorance , at the same weight Dorian actually crushes Ronnie in thickness and density of the traps without question , both are very comparable in terms of lat thickness and sweep , Dorian clearly shows better detail and development of the lower lats , Dorian lats actually insert lower than Ronnie's do , erector spinae Dorian again crushes him in thickness and detail , development and detail of the teres major & minor are a push and the same with the infraspinatus

Dorian clearly has a better overall back than Ronnie to argue to the contrary is futile.

[Hulkster]

what seperates Dorian from Ronnie is better lower lats and lower back , these are two areas that Ronnie can't match up with Yates and he is comparable in all other areas.

what about ARMS? hello? they are integral to having a GREAT BACK.

[Hulkster]

I don't think dorian had a better back than Ronnie did in 1999.

Maybe 1996.

but not 1999.

[NeoSeminole]

damn, this comparison shows how much thicker Ronnie's back was. Just look at the way his lats pop out. His christmas tree also looks 3D. Dorian's back looks dry as hell but flat as a pancake.

[NarcissisticDeity]

what about ARMS? hello? they are integral to having a GREAT BACK.

This is why this debate is this long because you insist on slanted comparisons and out right lies , please post pictures of Yates from his best not his worse

and we're talking about who has the best back , you tried and failed with Ronnie has a better back because he has a better taper logic lol Dorian clearly has a better back and if you want arms look at the arms , the biceps , triceps , forearms = ARMS , of and lets not forget the calves as well , hey lets also add some more of the criteria like balance & proportion 

[Hulkster]

It has been mentioned many many many times that ronnie's back makes dorian's look flat.

look at the THICKNESS of muscle on the lower back

[NarcissisticDeity]

damn, this comparison shows how much thicker Ronnie's back was. Just look at the way his lats pop out. His christmas tree also looks 3D. Dorian's back looks dry as hell but flat as a pancake.

It can't be a coincidence that all Coleman fans are lacking lol it just can't , Ronnie doesn't have thicker lats not by a long shot , especially not in this comparison lol

[Hulkster]

of and lets not forget the calves as well ,

calves have nothing to do with how good your back is.

that is like saying my quads suffer because my chest is not as good.

they are completely independent of one another.

[Hulkster]

This is why this debate is this long because you insist on slanted comparisons and out right lies , please post pictures of Yates from his best not his worse

and we're talking about who has the best back , you tried and failed with Ronnie has a better back because he has a better taper logic lol Dorian clearly has a better back and if you want arms look at the arms , the biceps , triceps , forearms = ARMS , of and lets not forget the calves as well , hey lets also add some more of the criteria like balance & proportion 

please post some shots of dorian not standing alone from two feet away and see how good has arms are

thats your strategy.

post pics of dorian so close that you can see the acne on his back and proclaim him to have good arms from the back..

well guess what ND:

bodybuilding is not judged like that.

Its judged ONSTAGE:

[NarcissisticDeity]

It has been mentioned many many many times that ronnie's back makes dorian's look flat.

look at the THICKNESS of muscle on the lower back

LMFAO this is another pathetic attempt at finding a new angle to counter Dorian's clear advantages , Dorian's back looks " FLAT " lol does his back look ' flat ' now?

[NarcissisticDeity]

calves have nothing to do with how good your back is.

that is like saying my quads suffer because my chest is not as good.

they are completely independent of one another.

Ah this is where you're wrong the judges spefically ask for one leg back and a flexed calf in BOTH The rear double biceps pose and the rear latspread , you focus on what you think the judges like and then I'll correct you.

[Hulkster]

LMFAO this is another pathetic attempt at finding a new angle to counter Dorian's clear advantages , Dorian's back looks " FLAT " lol does his back look ' flat ' now?

why yes, yes it does:

compared to this:

[NarcissisticDeity]

please post some shots of dorian not standing alone from two feet away and see how good has arms are

thats your strategy.

post pics of dorian so close that you can see the acne on his back and proclaim him to have good arms from the back..

well guess what ND:

bodybuilding is not judged like that.

Its judged ONSTAGE:

Its judged ONSTAGE? I know I've told you this numerous times and guess what? almost straight firsts in EVERY SINGLE ONE OF HIS OLYMPIA WINS ONSTAGE lol he won every round at every contest just not with perfect scores which was one of the posing rounds in 1994

[NarcissisticDeity]

why yes, yes it does:

compared to this:

He's still missing Yates detail , thickness and development of the lower lats and erector spinae , that pic looks compressed anyway , Dorian still has a better back .

[Hulkster]

Ah this is where you're wrong the judges spefically ask for one leg back and a flexed calf in BOTH The rear double biceps pose and the rear latspread , you focus on what you think the judges like and then I'll correct you.

you are confusing the terms "back only" which is what we are debating and

back double biceps POSE as there is a distinction.

dorian has better calves, but ronnie's has far superior glutes and hams, even if you claim they are overdeveloped, something that no judge has ever believed.