Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[Hulkster]

He's still missing Yates detail , thickness and development of the lower lats and erector spinae , that pic looks compressed anyway , Dorian still has a better back .

LOL now the pic is compressed

Pubic should be criticizing YOU for excuses, not me.

[NarcissisticDeity]

LOL now the pic is compressed

Pubic should be criticizing YOU for excuses, not me.

Oh no you've cornered the market on excuses and yet still he is still lacking in that pic in terms of detailed and development of the lower lats and erector spinae , you can't counter that.

[NarcissisticDeity]

you are confusing the terms "back only" which is what we are debating and

back double biceps POSE as there is a distinction.

dorian has better calves, but ronnie's has far superior glutes and hams, even if you claim they are overdeveloped, something that no judge has ever believed.

Glutes far superior in what reguard? being overdeveloped and compromising his balace? sure and superior hams? please explain how Ronnie's are superior to these please. lets NOT forget the judges are always looking for balance & proportion this is another area Ronnie is behind Yates in , lets not just pick the criteria that YOU  think the judges are looking for.

[Hulkster]

Glutes far superior in what reguard? being overdeveloped and compromising his balace? sure and superior hams? please explain how Ronnie's are superior to these please.

one look is all it takes oh delusional one...

[NarcissisticDeity]

one look is all it takes oh delusional one...

He has a bigger ass thats about it  and hamstrings are very comparable you can't argue with this !!

[NarcissisticDeity]

lol, ND ignores this in his next post right after:

Matt elaborate on your opinion that Ronnie has a better back 

[NeoSeminole]

It can't be a coincidence that all Coleman fans are lacking lol it just can't , Ronnie doesn't have thicker lats not by a long shot , especially not in this comparison lol

ask anyone who's back looks thicker in this comparison. Dorian's back looks vacuum sealed onto him while Ronnie's actually has depth.

[Hulkster]

He has a bigger ass thats about it  and hamstrings are very comparable you can't argue with this !!

"very comparable"

that has become your catchphrase.

problem is, in terms of Ronnie vs dorian, it seems that

"very comparable" = "nowhere near as good"

[NarcissisticDeity]

ask anyone who's back looks thicker in this comparison. Dorian's back looks vacuum sealed onto him while Ronnie's actually has depth.

I don't need to ask anyone , look at Yates' traps for depth and thickness , look at the thickness of Yates lower lats , they look like steel cords , Yates cornered the market on density & thickness.

[NarcissisticDeity]

"very comparable"

that has become your catchphrase.

problem is, in terms of Ronnie vs dorian, it seems that

"very comparable" = "nowhere near as good"

No where near as good? please you paint broad strokes yet offer up no explanation , Dorians back is simply better than Ronnies why? because he has everything Ronnie has and then some ! Ronnie's back is lagging behind Dorian's this is why Samir Bannout called it the second best back of all time.

[Hulkster]

Ronnie's back is lagging behind Dorian's this is why Samir Bannout called it the second best back of all time.

 

[NarcissisticDeity]

Look at the thickness and density of Dorian's traps no one can match this , Hulkster you love to go on about how Ronnie has a better ' upper back ' this is part of the upper back and Ronnie can't match Dorian here either.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Show me a picture(s) where Ronnie has a better developed and detailed lower back and lower lats , Dorian has everything in those pictures and then some.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ronnie can't match this !

[NarcissisticDeity]

Look at the upper back 

[NeoSeminole]

I don't need to ask anyone , look at Yates' traps for depth and thickness , look at the thickness of Yates lower lats , they look like steel cords , Yates cornered the market on density & thickness.

yeah, sure. You're looking at the color red and seeing grey. Then you dismiss everyone else's opinions b/c you think you're seeing correctly.

[NarcissisticDeity]

yeah, sure. You're looking at the color red and seeing grey. Then you dismiss everyone else's opinions b/c you think you're seeing correctly.

Well Hulkster's opinion I dismiss because he's insane , I mean seriously lol I gave you a shot until you came out with that whacked comparison of Yates 93 Ronnoe 03 lol but I've always maintained an open mind that at his best Dorian could lose to Ronnie I'm not that arrogant in my opinion , there is a chance but I don't think there is a high probability.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ronnie's back is bigger by a wider margin than Dorian's back is better conditioned than Ronnie's.

5% better conditioning (if that), doesn't make up for 15% more size.

15% more size? elaborate on how you came to the conclusion that Ronnie's back is 15% bigger.

[Hulkster]

Ronnie's back is bigger by a wider margin than Dorian's back is better conditioned than Ronnie's.

5% better conditioning (if that), doesn't make up for 15% more size.

which presentation of Ronnie are you speaking of?

I would assume 2003, but I believe his back looked better in 98/9 than in 2003 due to a smaller waist (=better taper) and much better detail.

for shear width and thickness though, no one has yet to match Ronnie 2003.

no one. yet.

screencaps of 2003 vs 1999:

[Hulkster]

15% more size? elaborate on how you came to the conclusion that Ronnie's back is 15% bigger.

ND in 2003 ronnie's back probably WAS that much bigger:

just look at this:





its insane.

[LyricTenor]

elaborate/quote]

I would, but I'm worried it will make this thread too long.

lol, nice

[NeoSeminole]

elaborate/quote]

I would, but I'm worried it will make this thread too long.

lol, nice

ha ha ha

[NarcissisticDeity]

This is what you call a complete shot from head to toe

[Hulkster]

impressive lower back shot, but I would not call that complete when your calves are as big as your arms....




monster imbalance...

[delta9mda]

you are so used to seeing no/ small calves on competitors that of course yates look too big. yeah maybe his arms could be a little bigger but you are always comparing with ron who has super high peaked bis.
think of how much more powerful and balanced ron would look with a big real pair of calves.