Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce

[NeoSeminole]

what pics? By all means, please show me these pics of 03 Ronnie's gut during the symmetry round.

Suckmyasshole, I'm still waiting for a reply to this. I would think for someone who regularly claims that 03 Ronnie's gut would cost him the symmetry round that you would have plenty of evidence.

[Hulkster]

f someone has an advantage from the quality of the material  *pics/vids* then it's yates so please do me a favour and STFU with your stupid presumptions and go to a gym you skinny little bitch  Grin  Grin  Grin

absolutely beautiful.

as ND, would say, Great Post!

[pobrecito]

absolutely beautiful.

as ND, would say, Great Post!

Why is it that every 99 picture Coleman looks substantially worse than the screencaps? Also, Ronnie looks very underwhelming on the 99GP video.

[Shockwave]

Why is it that every 99 picture Coleman looks substantially worse than the screencaps? Also, Ronnie looks very underwhelming on the 99GP video.

Que B&W 99O pic.

[NarcissisticDeity]

1999 Hulkster  notice a slight difference?

[Hulkster]

Why is it that every 99 picture Coleman looks substantially worse than the screencaps? Also, Ronnie looks very underwhelming on the 99GP video.

it doesn't:


for example, those quads look every bit as awesome as they do in the screencaps.

you have to remeber this: there are lots of great actual pics from the 93 show showing Flex, dorian and shawn.

How many pics are there of the 99 show showing Ronnie, chris and Flex? almost none.

here is another shot from the show, and again, it looks every bit as impressive as ANY of the screencaps:

[Shockwave]

it doesn't:


for example, those quads look every bit as awesome as they do in the screencaps.

you have to remeber this: there are lots of great actual pics from the 93 show showing Flex, dorian and shawn.

How many pics are there of the 99 show showing Ronnie, chris and Flex? almost none.

here is another shot from the show, and again, it looks every bit as impressive as ANY of the screencaps:

Hate to break it to you, but the screencaps are in color, that isn't.
Way to not prove anything.

[Hulkster]

1999 Hulkster  notice a slight difference?

of course I do.

are you going to insist that the extreme difference is simply from the difference between a pic and a vidcap?

please.

anyone can see Ronnie is not contracting yet in the first shot - you could SKATE on his back for god's sakes...

watch the prejudging vid - you will see that the hardness in the back double bi in the screencap is right there. Its right on film for all to see.

[pobrecito]

Ronnie really doesn't look all that great on the video - especially not what the screencaps would lead you to believe. Yates was far more impressive on video and in person.

[Hulkster]

Hate to break it to you, but the screencaps are in color, that isn't.
Way to not prove anything.

but it doesn't matter:

the detail is there colour or not:


note how the chest and quads are just as detailed as the screencaps.

I really think this whole "Ronnie is only amazing because its a screencap!" argument is really stupid- it comes accross as being really desperate.

watch the prejudging video and you will be just as amazed as you were looking at the caps.

ps if anyone has the old ironman mag with the 99 coverage in it there are some great actual pics of ronnie in it...

[NarcissisticDeity]

of course I do.

are you going to insist that the extreme difference is simply from the difference between a pic and a vidcap?

please.

anyone can see Ronnie is not contracting yet in the first shot - you could SKATE on his back for god's sakes...

watch the prejudging vid - you will see that the hardness in the back double bi in the screencap is right there. Its right on film for all to see.

See a difference? screencap vs a picture both are fully flexed.

[Hulkster]

Ronnie really doesn't look all that great on the video - especially not what the screencaps would lead you to believe. Yates was far more impressive on video and in person.

ummm.. thats not what you said ealier on in the thread...

[Iceman1981]

Yeah I'm Hulkster, man you are full of shit if you really believe that 

I'm from germany and the only reason why I don't post much here is that I'm a bodybuilder and bodybuilding happens in the gym so I don't have the time like you to visit the board 24/7 

I prefer to look like a bodybuilder instead of waisting my time by arguing on the net which pro would beat a other pro if they would compete together

Besides that I'm not a guy of coleman,yates,haney or a other pro 

I'm just a regular bodybuilding fan and I couldn't care less what internet fanboys think.

The only reason why I have posted the pics and the vids was to provide more material for the topic here.
I must admit it's always fun to check this topic from time to time.

Guys that insult others as internet-fan-boy,crybabies or nut-huggers are always entertaining 

Some of you guys should really realize first that it's stupid to call someone guy, internet-fan-boy etc... if you act the same over a other pro

@IceCold

BTW, the yates 93 pics/vids were ripped from the original DVD in very high quality and the coleman 99 pics/vids were taken from a crapy VHS tape cause I was too lazy to search on my DVD's for the 99 MR.O.

If someone has an advantage from the quality of the material  *pics/vids* then it's yates so please do me a favour and STFU with your stupid presumptions and go to a gym you skinny little bitch     

lol, that was funniest stuff on this thread in a while. I don't blame the guy with what he said.

[Iceman1981]

1999 Hulkster  notice a slight difference?

Yes I do. Coleman whole backside is washed out with light causing him to look smooth, where as the bottom pic has good lighting.

[Hulkster]

Yes I do. Coleman whole backside is washed out with light causing him to look smooth, where as the bottom pic has good lighting.

exactly.

the lighting was not kind to Ronnie that night. - not only that, in the "soft" pic you can see that he is scrunching up his back - check the lower traps out.

just look at how bad Ronnie got washed out that night:


it was so bad he looked WHITE..

[NarcissisticDeity]

Notice any difference between the screencaps and pictures?

[Hulkster]

can you believe this lighting!


 

[Iceman1981]

Ok here is the 2000 Mr. Olympia video

During Coleman's posing routine the commentators clearly state:

First Commentator: "Look at that back. Those lats popping out."

Second Commentator: "The most incredible back in body building history, I believe right there. Dorian was noted for his back, Lee Haney for his. But this mans back is just like something out of a comic book."

The commentator was there and witnessed it in person. I'll take his word for it. I'll go by quotes also.

[Hulkster]

Notice any difference between the screencaps and pictures?

the only difference between the ronnie shots in that comaprison is the lighting.

look:

the lower back is the same in both.

the "fingers" on the back are the same in both

the arms are the same.

but the lighting in the actual pic is washing the contrast out.

Probably from the photographers camera flash...

[NarcissisticDeity]

Ok here is the 2000 Mr. Olympia video

During Coleman's posing routine the commentators clearly state:

First Commentator: "Look at that back. Those lats popping out."

Second Commentator: "The most incredible back in body building history, I believe right there. Dorian was noted for his back, Lee Haney for his. But this mans back is just like something out of a comic book."

The commentator was there and witnessed it in person. I'll take his word for it. I'll go by quotes also.

LMFAO and that means what? that his lowerlats are better developed and detailed? does it also mean he has better detailed & developed erector spinae? does it mean he has thicker & denser traps? not to mention he's holding water too ! the guy is giving his opinion and he's entitled to it even if he's wrong !

[NarcissisticDeity]

the only difference between the ronnie shots in that comaprison is the lighting.

look:

the lower back is the same in both.

the "fingers" on the back are the same in both

the arms are the same.

but the lighting in the actual pic is washing the contrast out.

Probably from the photographers camera flash...

Hulkster there is a very notice difference between photos and screencaps you really can't argue otherwise !  and these screen caps are way lighter than the ones you keep posting , I tried to resize them to do a side-by-side but the pics are to small to resized but a very noticable difference.

[Iceman1981]

LMFAO and that means what? that his lowerlats are better developed and detailed? does it also mean he has better detailed & developed erector spinae? does it mean he has thicker & denser traps? the guy is giving his opinion and he's entitled to it even if he's wrong .

lol. And the guy is wrong? Why? And you're quotes are right? Why? You used quotes and I used quotes and a video with the commentators saying it.

lol. I can see you were quick to jump on this post I made. That simply shows you will never agree with how good anyone says Coleman's back is and that it is the best back in history. This whole thread is a big sham then. The rest of us are just waisting our time because "The Great ND" knows everything. lol.

[pobrecito]

lol. And the guy is wrong? Why? And you're quotes are right? Why? You used quotes and I used quotes and a video with the commentators saying it.

lol. I can see you were quick to jump on this post I made. That simply shows you will never agree with how good anyone says Coleman's back is and that it is the best back in history. This whole thread is a big sham then. The rest of us are just waisting our time because "The Great ND" knows everything. lol.

Those commentators were fucking idiots....watch the pre-show where they interview Dorian and you will know why I was laughing my ass off.

[pobrecito]

hahahahahahahahah

[NarcissisticDeity]

lol. And the guy is wrong? Why? And you're quotes are right? Why? You used quotes and I used quotes and a video with the commentators saying it.

lol. I can see you were quick to jump on this post I made. That simply shows you will never agree with how good anyone says Coleman's back is and that it is the best back in history. This whole thread is a big sham then. The rest of us are just waisting our time because "The Great ND" knows everything. lol.

I will explain exactly why that guy is wrong , Ronnie is comparable in the back with Dorian , he has comparable lat width , lat thickness , lat sweep however Yates' lats insert lower near the waist  ! he has comparable detail & development of the teres major & minor as well as the infraspinatus , Dorian has noticeably thicker and bigger traps , his lower lats are developed and detailed in a way Ronnie's are NOT and the erector spinae on Yates is clearly thicker and more developed and Dorian's back is drier , especially compared to 2000 because Ronnie was 264 pounds and holding water , so I can very easily say Dorian has a better back and I can back up my claim with quotes , pictures , and video

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7282226660836565429&q=dorian+yates&hl=en

Samir Bannout who had one of the best backs mind you on Cutler 2001

Jay Cutler blows the other bodybuilders away with the crisp detail of his muscularity from top to bottom. He has superior calves, hamstrings and glutes. His back is detailed and big, but it does not match up well against Ronnie, who has the second-best back in the history of bodybuilding behind the great Dorian Yates

Ronnie has the second best back behind the great Dorian Yates


Ronnie Coleman on Dorian Yates

DESCRIBE DORIAN YATES: A close friend. Dorian is very intelligent, a great Mr. Olympia. He had the best side-chest pose and the thickest freakiest back I have ever seen.