there's no need b/c I never claimed this. I disagreed with your comment that the triceps long head is "so small that it's irrelevant" in the back relaxed and rear lat spread. I already showed you with pictorial evidence why you are wrong. The long head is the largest of the 3 heads, and it makes up the bulk of the arm from the rear.
Ha ha ha ha ha...
I'm still waiting for you to give me a single example of a bodybuilder who had a worst back, yet won the rear lat spread on virtue of having the better triceps. What a fucking putz...
To claim that they are irrelevant when viewed from the back due to their size is like saying the medial head of the biceps is irrelevant when viewed in the front double biceps.
Terible analogy. Why? Due to the positioning of the muscles. In the front double biceps, the full mass of the biceps is visible. The fact that the medial head is concealed is irrelevant, because the size of the muscle is viewed from the front and the the medial head is already factored in - because it neither adds to or subtracts from the biceps size. A better analogy would be flexing the biceps and then looking at it from the top.
Owned.
I've posted these pics like 30 times. I guess when you know that you are losing, you like to pretend the pics don't exist.
What about the tons of pics that NarcissisticDeity has posted showing Ronnie's distended gut? Are you pretending they don't exist?
This reminds me of when you claimed that Dorian's triceps were more striated than Ronnie's. I even posted a high-quality, up close pic of Dorian's triceps looking smooth, and you still kept saying his were more striated than Ronnie's.
Because it is. Dorian's lateral triceps head is also longer and fuller than Ronnie's. No contest.
wow, no gut!
Controlling the alien queen is not impossible. Unfortunately for Ronnie, it has already been demonstrated that he is uinable to control her at all times.
I've already demonstrated this. Another person even agreed with me that Nasser's lats were just as wide, if not wider, than Dorian's. If you cannot see that Nasser's lats are in the same league as Dorian's in terms of width, then I honestly feel sorry for you. I don't know what I would do if I started losing my vision.
So why did Dorian defeat Nasser in the rear lat
spread? First of all, back separations are barely visible in this pose, so the key issue is size. You're so stupid that you actually said that Nasser's back as not merely as wide, but wideER than Dorian.
No one had a wider back than Dorian, you retard, until the 2003 Olympia, when Ronnie surpassed him slightly. Even in 1996, Nasser's back was barely as wide, let alone wider than Dorian's. Now, I'm willing to concead that a 285 lbs Nasser had a back as wide as a 255 lbs Dorian's, but not wider. Now, in the the review of the 1997 Olympia, Peter McGough especifically said that Dorian defeated Nasser, from the back, due to much greater
development.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
