Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3101445 times)

Hulkster · « **Reply #19100 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:21:38 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 04, 2007, 06:17:42 PM

I used everything at my disposal , pictures , quotes , videos , firsthand accounts ..

After doing this, I disregard them all and rely on some opinion given 12 years ago.

agreed.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #19101 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:23:35 PM »

I don't understand how people can award Dorian triceps when he was arguably better in only 1 head - the lateral head. It's not even the largest of the 3 heads. I say arguably b/c it comes down to personal preference. Ronnie utterly destroys Dorian in overall triceps. This is apparent in any pose other than the side triceps.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #19102 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:25:12 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on January 04, 2007, 06:21:38 PM

agreed.

translation Hulkster " I'm getting my ass beat down with pictures , videos , and quotes that just utterly destroy my lame ass opinion that Dorian was the most overrated of all time , so I keep denying the obvious , Dorian Yates was in another league compared to Ronnie Cooleman "

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #19103 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:27:40 PM »

I love this shot lol you NEVER never ever have a right to bitch about my comparisons lol Ronnie at 249 pounds looks as wide and as big as he did at 300 pounds compared to Dorian in this comparison , its just a complete joke lol

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #19104 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:30:48 PM »

onlyme · « **Reply #19105 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:32:39 PM »

I have figured it out..................

HULKSTER= COLEMAN[/color]

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #19106 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:33:13 PM »

Quote from: onlyme on January 04, 2007, 06:32:39 PM

I have figured it out..................

HULKSTER= COLEMAN[/color]

LMFAO

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #19107 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:34:25 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 04, 2007, 06:27:40 PM

I love this shot lol you NEVER never ever have a right to bitch about my comparisons lol Ronnie at 249 pounds looks as wide and as big as he did at 300 pounds compared to Dorian in this comparison , its just a complete joke lol

wtf are you talking about? Dorian is slightly rotated to the side. So you can't fully see how wide he is. I used that shot b/c I couldn't find any better pics to compare them from that angle. Ronnie in no way looks as wide there as he does at 300 lbs. Also, you have no right to criticize my pics after you photoshoped Dorian to make him appear bigger than he really is.

Iceman1981 · « **Reply #19108 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:36:08 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on January 04, 2007, 10:28:56 AM

coleman looks great in 99 - that isnt the question.

the screencaps from the dvd and the mini poster are real and coleman looks great in those as well.

however, the other screencaps were darkened so that ronnie would look harder and dryer - something that is not reflected in the poster which is the correct representation of the dvd.

the other screen caps are from nothing. they were tampered with. but yet hulkster refuses to post the real pics and instead uses the fake ones saying how well conditioned coleman is.

just look at ronnie's color.

he is the same color in the poster, you tube, vhs, pictures, etc.

why would he be darker on one dvd vs. another?

I truly believe your wrong my friend. I saw the video on youtube and the background color is the same darkness as the pics Hulkster posted. So how can they be tampered with? Plus Coleman is the same color in the pics as the video. I even took screencaps of my own from the same video to add to my pic collection.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #19109 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:37:19 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 04, 2007, 06:30:48 PM

Look at the thickness of Ronnie's back.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #19110 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:37:41 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on January 04, 2007, 06:34:25 PM

wtf are you talking about? Dorian is slightly rotated to the side. So you can't fully see how wide he is. I used that shot b/c I couldn't find any better pics to compare them from that angle. Ronnie in no way looks as wide there as he does at 300 lbs. Also, you have no right to criticize my pics after you photoshoped Dorian to make him appear bigger than he really is.

I never photoshopped it nice try and that was the second one I made and Now I'm doing it better than you

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #19111 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:38:42 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on January 04, 2007, 06:37:19 PM

Look at the thickness of Ronnie's back.

He does have a thick back !

IceCold · « **Reply #19112 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:39:03 PM »

Quote from: Iceman1981 on January 04, 2007, 06:36:08 PM

I truly believe your wrong my friend. I saw the video on youtube and the background color is the same darkness as the pics Hulkster posted. So how can they be tampered with? Plus Coleman is the same color in the pics as the video. I even took screencaps of my own from the same video to add to my pic collection.

wrong.

coleman is clearly darker in those pics vs anything else.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #19113 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:39:41 PM »

Yates dominates

Hulkster · « **Reply #19114 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:40:01 PM »

the detail is the same whether Ronnie was darker, lighter or purple.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #19115 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:40:24 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 04, 2007, 06:37:41 PM

I never photoshopped it nice try and that was the second one I made and Now I'm doing it better than you

son, please! The program you use distorts the pics. You still have a ways to go.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #19116 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:40:37 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on January 04, 2007, 06:39:03 PM

wrong.

coleman is clearly darker in those pics vs anything else.

Anyone who says those are the same are fucking high !

IceCold · « **Reply #19117 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:41:35 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on January 04, 2007, 06:37:19 PM

Look at the thickness of Ronnie's back.

he does.

but thanks for prooving our point.

that pic is from 96.

how did ronnie's 'thick back' do against dorian that year.

answer - 6th.

that's the closest he EVER got to dorian.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #19118 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:42:05 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on January 04, 2007, 06:40:24 PM

son, please! The program you use distorts the pics. You still have a ways to go.

Keep trying

IceCold · « **Reply #19119 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:42:56 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on January 04, 2007, 06:40:01 PM

the detail is the same whether Ronnie was darker, lighter or purple.

true and i never disputed that.

but the darker color makes ronnie look dryer and harder.

which is a huge deal - yates won 6 olympias on dryness and hardness.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #19120 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:43:25 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on January 04, 2007, 06:41:35 PM

he does.

but thanks for prooving our point.

that pic is from 96.

how did ronnie's 'thick back' do against dorian that year.

answer - 6th.

that's the closest he EVER got to dorian.

lol he got 5th a few times on the Euro-tour because everyone gave up trying to beat Yates and he got lucky , he was 250 pounds in that pic too !

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #19121 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:45:08 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 04, 2007, 06:42:05 PM

Keep trying

bwahahahaha, look at how Ronnie's head magically changes shape in your comparisons. One moment he has a cone head. The next moment he has a pumpkin head. Face it kid, you suck at this.

Hulkster · « **Reply #19122 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:45:45 PM »

notice how ronnie's biceps/arms are so huge you can't even see his armpits in the front lat spread...

dorian doesn't have that problem because his arms are like threads hanging off a t-shirt..

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #19123 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:46:51 PM »

ND, this comparison I made a while ago is still more accurate than anything you've made so far. At least I don't distort the images to fit a desired space.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #19124 on:** January 04, 2007, 06:47:55 PM »

92 vs 98