Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce  (Read 3492133 times)

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19775 on: January 08, 2007, 03:02:06 PM »
Poor upper pecs  now you'd have some credibility if you claimed small arms even though thats stupid but ' horribly small arms ' is fucking nonsense , his midsection has always been big bit is tighter than Ronnie's when held firm and much more developed & detailed and , smooth as a babies ass like Hulkster you see what you want to see , Dorian's arms in 95 were HUGE , better balance , better conditioning , better density , like Hulkster stop fixating on what YOU think wins poses and use the criteria.

I see what's right there in front of me just like everybody else. Apparently, you see only what you want to see b/c you make unfounded statements like "Dorian had better balance" and "his lower back was thicker." That's not what the pics show. Dorian's arms might have been large, but they look like twigs compared to his massive torso. It doesn't matter what they measured. They could've been 23" for all I care. Bodybuilding is about illusion. The judges don't get onstage and measure each person. Likewise, Ronnie's calves were not small by any means, but they still look small compared to his massive quads.




NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83258
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19776 on: January 08, 2007, 03:04:05 PM »
saying dorian looked doughy is not an unfounded and ignorant claim:



Its an absoultely unfounded and ignorant claim , especially when you post strawmen pictures to back up your claim , pictures that are not indicitive to his conditioning at that particular contest

look everyone Ronnie was soft & doughy in 99 its an empty claim

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19777 on: January 08, 2007, 03:05:06 PM »
But having two missing calves isn't?

two missing arms is worse than two missing calves. ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83258
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19778 on: January 08, 2007, 03:06:36 PM »
I see what's right there in front of me just like everybody else. Apparently, you see only what you want to see b/c you make unfounded statements like "Dorian had better balance" and "his lower back was thicker." That's not what the pics show. Dorian's arms might have been large, but they look like twigs compared to his massive torso. It doesn't matter what they measured. They could've been 23" for all I care. Bodybuilding is about illusion. The judges don't get onstage and measure each person. Likewise, Ronnie's calves were not small by any means, but they still look small compared to his massive quads.



Well you're eyes need to be checked you're the guy who thinks Ronnie 2001 is bigger than 99  ::) and a 244 pound Ronnie carries more muscle than a 260 pound Dorian Yates

unfounded I've backed up my claims with many pics about the balance & thickness of his lower back and can do so at anytime


NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19779 on: January 08, 2007, 03:06:55 PM »
Here is a pic of Dorian from 95. This is supposed to be his good arm. :-\


pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19780 on: January 08, 2007, 03:09:00 PM »
I find it laughable that people try to minimize A SEVERELY TORN BICEP ON WHAT IS SUPPOSED TO BE THE BEST BUILT MAN ON THE PLANET.

I would think that having two intact biceps is pretty much a given ::)

And gyno and no calves are acceptable? ::)

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19781 on: January 08, 2007, 03:10:10 PM »
Well you're eyes need to be checked you're the guy who thinks Ronnie 2001 is bigger than 99 and a 244 pound Ronnie carries more muscle than a 260 pound Dorian Yates

ha ha ha, apparently you need your eyes checked b/c you can't read clearly. Please show me where I said that 01 ASC Ronnie was bigger than 99.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83258
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19782 on: January 08, 2007, 03:11:10 PM »
two missing arms is worse than two missing calves. ;)

Another empty claim , this is whats wrong with you & Hulkster you make baseless claims and pat yourselves on the back for a job well done when you've accomplished nothing , where is the missing arms? one bicep is shorter than then other big deal and its not shorter by much , bottom pic 93/95  ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83258
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19783 on: January 08, 2007, 03:12:23 PM »
ha ha ha, apparently you need your eyes checked b/c you can't read clearly. Please show me where I said that 01 ASC Ronnie was bigger than 99.

You said that Ronnie 2001 had the conditioning & hardness of 98 and I believe equal if NOT bigger than 99 , and when I was done laughing at you.

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19784 on: January 08, 2007, 03:23:06 PM »
Another empty claim , this is whats wrong with you & Hulkster you make baseless claims and pat yourselves on the back for a job well done when you've accomplished nothing , where is the missing arms? one bicep is shorter than then other big deal and its not shorter by much , bottom pic 93/95

oh, bullshit. My comment was a parody of your dumbass post. Do you honestly think Ronnie has no calves? I mean, seriously wtf? Does he just magically float around on his knees? ::)

pobrecito

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4851
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19785 on: January 08, 2007, 03:24:29 PM »
I bet Hulkster thinks this is a perfectly balanced and proportioned physique :-\


RocketSwitch625

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2420
  • Women fall all over me and Pumpster is FUGLY.
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19786 on: January 08, 2007, 03:25:03 PM »
Here is a pic of Dorian from 95. This is supposed to be his good arm. :-\



Jerk

NeoSeminole

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5589
  • Ronnie > Dorian
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19787 on: January 08, 2007, 03:28:22 PM »
You said that Ronnie 2001 had the conditioning & hardness of 98 and I believe equal if NOT bigger than 99 , and when I was done laughing at you.

No, I said that 01 ASC Ronnie had the conditioning of 98 with the size of 99. I never once said that he was bigger than before. I realize now that most of the weight discrepancy came from the quads. Ronnie's legs looked smaller, but this actually improved his balance. The rest of him looked just as big as in 99.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19788 on: January 08, 2007, 03:36:37 PM »
Here is a pic of Dorian from 95. This is supposed to be his good arm. :-\



its so great when reality proves ND's baseless claims wrong:

It happens all the time:

You're to used to looking at Ronnie's OVERDEVELOPED biceps/triceps and tend to think if anyone else's aren't that big they're to small thats nonsense you're damn right Dorian's arms were huge in 1995 , not as huge as Ronnie's but not underdeveloped or crappy or poor of any other nonsense claim you can come up with
[/b]

his "good" arm looks pretty damn crappy to me...
Flower Boy Ran Away

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19789 on: January 08, 2007, 03:41:57 PM »
You're an idiot this is a strawman its set up to for you to knock it down as if this was indictitive of Dorian's conditioning in 1995 and its NOT its a shitty screencapture done on purpose to claim an empty victory , Dorian was harder than steel in 95 , do deny so is biased and ignorance

What the hell are you talking about? I just posted a good screencap of yates from 95' Olympia. lol, don't blame that your idol looks soft and smooth. Shitty? looks like a clear pic to me.

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19790 on: January 08, 2007, 03:43:53 PM »
Dorian looks outstanding in that shot.

He looks good in that shot, but then again not as good as Coleman in the same pose.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83258
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19791 on: January 08, 2007, 03:44:17 PM »
oh, bullshit. My comment was a parody of your dumbass post. Do you honestly think Ronnie has no calves? I mean, seriously wtf? Does he just magically float around on his knees? ::)

At his best Ronnie's calves are severly lacking for a professional bodybuilder , they lack development of the gastrocnemius inner & outer heads , they lack the coveted diamond shape , they lack separation , they lack a greatly developed soleus , they lack proportion & balance in relation , for the billionth time having these problems pose much more of a liability compared to ' small ' biceps torn ' small ' biceps can be hidden in all but one pose , weak calves cannot they are clearly visible in every single pose , from every single angle , you can't dispute this or argue to the contrary

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83258
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19792 on: January 08, 2007, 03:45:40 PM »
No, I said that 01 ASC Ronnie had the conditioning of 98 with the size of 99. I never once said that he was bigger than before. I realize now that most of the weight discrepancy came from the quads. Ronnie's legs looked smaller, but this actually improved his balance. The rest of him looked just as big as in 99.

Its still a baseless claim its nonsense he's NOT the same size as he was in 99

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19793 on: January 08, 2007, 03:45:53 PM »
8)





I would like to hear tall of he bs the yates nuthuggers will have to say about this.

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19794 on: January 08, 2007, 03:46:33 PM »
Quote
lol, don't blame that your idol looks soft and smooth

LOL ND will blame:

-bad lighting
-doctored pics
-fake pics
-"not his best year"
etc etc

anything to avoid the harsh reality that his idol looked like a roll of pillsbury croissants in many shots...

LOL:
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83258
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19795 on: January 08, 2007, 03:47:16 PM »
its so great when reality proves ND's baseless claims wrong:

It happens all the time:
[/b]

his "good" arm looks pretty damn crappy to me...

It looks crappy because you prefer Ronnie's ? in certain angles Dorian's arms at times appear small , are they small? I think not  ;) you post a single pic to prove your point its not accurate or fair

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83258
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19796 on: January 08, 2007, 03:48:42 PM »
What the hell are you talking about? I just posted a good screencap of yates from 95' Olympia. lol, don't blame that your idol looks soft and smooth. Shitty? looks like a clear pic to me.

Yawn you're a typical Coleman fan think you've accomplished something , Yates was not smooth or soft in 95 that was Ronnie for most of his career  ;)

Iceman1981

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5184
  • www.LegendsOfBodybuilding.com
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19797 on: January 08, 2007, 03:49:16 PM »
That's hardly noticeable.

This is probably the "WORST DOUBLE BI IN HISTORY"

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83258
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19798 on: January 08, 2007, 03:50:45 PM »
This is probably the "WORST DOUBLE BI IN HISTORY"

You need a better pic  ;) and that front double biceps is from 96 and he crushed Ronnie and his fabulous biceps that year lol

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83258
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Hulkster I'm calling for a Truce
« Reply #19799 on: January 08, 2007, 03:52:54 PM »
This one I posted isn't even as good as it gets but its a lot better than your lame strawman  ;)