yawn, I'm just going around in circles with you. Everything you said has already been disproven. Nice try kid. 
Yes, you have disproven that you have an intellect. Ok, please demonstrate the following:
1. That Dorian's skeletal frame was heavier than Ronnie's. Considering that Black Men have significantly heavier bones than Whites, this is unlikely.
2. That Dorian's gut was bigger than Coleman. Amazingly, the photographic evidence you love so much doesen't agree with you.
3. That Ronnie's chest, triceps, delts and back were bigger than Dorian's. This is an incredible claim, since Ronnie's arms were only 1 inch bigger than Dorian's in 1999, and his biceps were considerable bigger.
4. That Ronnie had less water inside his muscles but less under his skin. This is a bizare one. It's obvious that Ronnie's muscles have more water inside them - since they're fuller -, but less outside, since he looks bloated next to Dorian. What's so fucking hard for you to understand
Unless you prove these points, we have nothing to discuss. Giving their weight and conditioning, odds are that Dorian carried more mass. Also, and again, it is
impossible for Ronnie to have bigger triceps, chest delts, etc than Dorian unless you prove the four points I made, because otherwise,
obviously Ronnie would have to, by necessity, be much heavier. This is beyond discussion: it is simple logic. And once again, I must reiterate that how big a muscle
looks is immaterial to this discussion. How you have the stupidity to even argue this is beyond me.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
