Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3491912 times)

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #20500 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:13:56 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on January 12, 2007, 06:09:03 PM

it showcases the arms and chest.

that makes it pretty damn important.

its not my fault that dorian's upper body sucked compared to Ronnie's.

Sucked Ronnie can't hang with this especially when you take into consideration the criteria I recall after seeing this pic Hulkster cried " morphed " because he relaized that even in his favorite shot he gets owned

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #20501 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:15:04 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on January 12, 2007, 06:13:35 PM

and dorian's doesn't?

Why don't you go back to arguing how great Ronnie 99 was?

or is that going to be next week?

Every time you post a pic of Yates NOT at his best it shows your frustration level lol I love it

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #20502 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:16:47 PM »

Ronnie , Dorian with equal or better conditioning , better density , balance & proportion and 16 extra pounds of pure muscle

Fixed it

pobrecito · « **Reply #20503 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:17:00 PM »

Dorian's chest looks far thicker in the front double biceps than Ronnie's ever did.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #20504 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:17:09 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 12, 2007, 06:15:04 PM

Every time you post a pic of Yates NOT at his best it shows your frustration level lol I love it

coming from the guy who has the largest collection of Ronnie gut pics on his computer.

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #20505 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:17:52 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 12, 2007, 06:16:47 PM

Ronnie with equal or better conditioning , better density , balance & proportion and 16 extra pounds of pure muscle

I agree, and I swear that I didn't change the words.

pobrecito · « **Reply #20506 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:19:06 PM »

Ronnie's front double biceps was sub par. I never thought he looked good in this pose, especially in 98 posing next to Cormier. Dorian in 93 had a better front double biceps.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #20507 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:20:59 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on January 12, 2007, 06:17:09 PM

coming from the guy who has the largest collection of Ronnie gut pics on his computer.

Thats to keep the dolts in check when the post a pic of Yates gut

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #20508 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:21:44 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on January 12, 2007, 06:17:52 PM

I agree, and I swear that I didn't change the words.

Really you agree Ronnie has 16 extra pounds of pure muscle? lol

suckmymuscle · « **Reply #20509 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:22:01 PM »

NeoSperm, let's try a different approach. Let's pretend that the 1999 Ronnie actually did have more mass in his triceps, delts, back, etc, than Dorian - not true, but let's pretend. Even in this case, Ronnie's muscles would still not be bigger than Dorian's. Why? Because in this case, and since their weights are the same, it would mean that Dorian compensated for his relative lack of mass in relation to Ronnie by having bigger bones. In other words, even then, the total size of the muscles, as an arithmetic average, would still be similar for both of them, since their physical masses would be equivalent at 257 lbs. Oh my, now that's one severe beating you just took!

SUCKMYMUSCLE

pobrecito · « **Reply #20510 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:22:13 PM »

Again, 1998, Ronnie's front double biceps completely ruined by the silver dollar sized mammory gland....a 93 Yates front double biceps would defeat Coleman in this pose.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #20511 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:22:43 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on January 12, 2007, 06:17:00 PM

Dorian's chest looks far thicker in the front double biceps than Ronnie's ever did.

Absolutely Ronnie's chest does get flat I think because he pulls his arms to far back

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #20512 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:23:00 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 12, 2007, 06:20:59 PM

Thats to keep the dolts in check when the post a pic of Yates gut

bullshit, you began posting pics of Ronnie's gut waaaay before Camp Coleman posted Dorian gut pics.

Hulkster · « **Reply #20513 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:23:01 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 12, 2007, 06:06:05 PM

And thats being kind because even in the poses Ronnie gets he' still behind in balance & proportion , density , depending on the year bulk and conditioning lol thats a major obstacle to overcome no matter what pose.

ND, we have already shown that even though you keep typing that dorian has better "balance, density and proprotion" it does not mean anything on your keyboard.

it has to stand up to the real world test.

and it fails miserably:

Ronnie had far better balance, proprotion and density:

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #20514 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:24:43 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 12, 2007, 06:21:44 PM

Really you agree Ronnie has 16 extra pounds of pure muscle? lol

sure, if you take away Dorian's enormous midsection. That's cheating. He easily holds 10 lbs extra in there.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #20515 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:25:41 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on January 12, 2007, 06:23:01 PM

ND, we have already shown that even though you keep typing that dorian has better "balance, density and proprotion" it does not mean anything on your keyboard.

it has to stand up to the real world test.

and it fails miserably:

Ronnie had far better balance, proprotion and density:

LMMFAO now Ronnie has better density as well? Oh jesus meltdown I put the balance & proportion issue to bed , and the density issue isn't worth addressing lol

pobrecito · « **Reply #20516 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:26:28 PM »

Another example of Ronnie's paper thin chest. It's obvious Coleman had a very thick chest, but how could your posing be this poor to negatively affect your physique

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #20517 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:27:38 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on January 12, 2007, 06:24:43 PM

sure, if you take away Dorian's enormous midsection. That's cheating. He easily holds 10 lbs extra in there.

It doesn't matter and 10 pounds

you wish it were 10 pounds in the midsection , you need it to be 10 pounds in the midsection , Dorian crushes 01 Ronnie in thickness & density in the back , delts , chest and calves .

pobrecito · « **Reply #20518 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:28:25 PM »

Exhibit C: Paper thin chest on the left, and soggy, soft Back on the right

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #20519 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:28:48 PM »

Hulkster Ronnie crushes Dorian on lumpiness too huh? lol

pobrecito · « **Reply #20520 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:30:17 PM »

Exhibit D: The biggest gift in bodybuilding history

pobrecito · « **Reply #20521 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:32:29 PM »

What do we have here? Answer: A Mr. Olympia with a back no harder or more separated than Cormier or oil-bag Flex.

pobrecito · « **Reply #20522 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:39:01 PM »

2004, WTF? Ronnie got so caught up in weight #s that he forgot to get in condition for the show

\

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #20523 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:41:35 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on January 12, 2007, 06:39:01 PM

2004, WTF? Ronnie got so caught up in weight #s that he forgot to get in condition for the show \

LMFAO post-tear Yates guestposing crushes Olympia Ronnie

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #20524 on:** January 12, 2007, 06:43:07 PM »

Here is a pic of Ronnie with his gut totally relaxed and if you though 03 was bad lol I just can't believe my eyes seriously

Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3491912 times)

suckmymuscle