ha ha ha ha, another misinformed post from Suckmyasshole. You have the unique distinction of being owned by BOTH sides of this debate.
I have the unique distinction of never having been owned by anyone at this board. As for Pobrecito's claim about Ronnie having a better taper than Flex at his best, I posted several pics from Flex at the 1993 ASC and Ironman proving him wrong. By the way, several people have quoted my posts and said that I owned you. How many have said that you owned me? No one.

You are correct that I said Ronnie has more larger muscles than Dorian. I already backed up my claim with plenty of pics, and the majority of people would agree with me. Did Ronnie have larger arms? Yes. Did Ronnie have larger delts and pecs? Yes. Did Ronnie have larger glutes? Yes. Did Ronnie have larger thighs? Yes. They tied in back and forearms, which leaves Dorian with a larger midsection and calves.
Again, you did
not claim that Ronnie's chest, delts, triceps and quads looked bigger than Dorian's; you claimed that they were in fact bigger. You're so fucking stupid that you don't seem to understand the concept that muscles can look bigger without actually being bigger.

A measurment, conversely, is mathematical and not open to debate. And the bottom line is that Ronnie's measurements were not bigger than Dorian in most of the bodyparts you've mentioned. Did Ronnie have larger arms than Dorian? Pobably. By one inch. And it was all biceps. There goes your bullshit claim that Ronnie had bigger triceps than Dorian.
Furthermore, I never said that Ronnie carried more lean mass at the same weight. If you actually read my posts instead of sticking your finger up your ass, you would notice I said Ronnie has more muscular bulk.
This is
not what you claimed before! You back-peddling piece of shit! You especifically said that Ronnie carried more lean mass than Dorian at the same bodyweight, and you provided as support for your hypothesis that most of what made Dorian have an equivalent weight came from his greater gut - although his gut was actually smaller -, and from his heavier skeletal frame. Nice try, dumbass! By the way, muscular bulk and lean mass are exactly the same thing, and sementics won't save your dumbass from being wrong. You have revealed your true colors to the board, and now everyone can see the lying loser that you truly are.
I'm refering to the property of his muscles appearing larger than Dorian's, which is true. I can care less about weight b/c its irrelevant in bodybuilding. It's not about how much you weigh but how much you look like you weigh. The judges don't get up onstage and weigh each competitor or measure their arms.
Another cynical back-peddle.

Yeah, so the "property of his muscles appearing larger" is what made you claim that the 2001 ASC Ronnie carried more mass than Dorian? Then why bring up the issue of his gut and frame? So the "property of looking larger" now adds lean mass? Yeah, that's probably why Wheeler looked larger than guys who outweighted him by 30 lbs: because he carried more lean mass. Ha ha ha ha ha ha...you have been
owned epically by yours truly for the gazillionth time, you little fucktard son of a c.u.n.t. You have been exposed as a sophomoric debater and for the intellectual train-wreck that you truly are. You perceive me as a threat, and rightfuly so, as I'm clearly on a whole other level in this debate than you are. That's probably the reason why you tried to get me banned a while ago by reporting me to the mods for "abuse"

. What a pathetic little piece of shit you are. I'm done with you. You have no game, dude. Adieu.

SUCKMYMUSCLE