ps
are you also going to expect us to believe that who ever posted the video's on google (back in 2005 
) are also in on the 'fake' conspiracy?
they must have altered them way back then in preperation for our thread 2 years later...
god you are an idiot
another classic hulkster meltdown.i never acutally beleived that they are actually "fake", but saying the word fake is easier than typing a description about the lighting, etc. and how ronnie - or anyone - from 99 didnt really look like that.
but they are not an accurate representation of the contest.
they match no other source related to 99.
of course, different sources will have different views, but like everything else, they are still similar.
like in 93. a bit different, but at least dorian's color is the same in all of them.
even in 91. yates still has the same color, but one pic is from a mag showing less quality than the screencap. there is still a similarity.
in every shot that isnt google, ronnie's color is much lighter and doestn look nearly as hard or dry as the fake pics from 99 when he is considerably darker. just look at the background. you can barely see it.
the google of ronnie match nothing. that was my whole point.
the descrepency between 99 and any other media source is the problem. ronnie in the google clip doesnt matche or even come close to any other media source related to the 99 olympia. the funny thing is that if coleman looked even worse than the 'real' pics, and all of us posted those pics (from google assuming that coleman looked like shit) you would be saying the same thing - they arent a true repsentation of that contest. you're only bitching bc that's your only source you have that can compete with yates.
