Author Topic: Dorian Yates kicks Ronnie's ass Hulkster is a punk Bitch and fuck any truce (Read 3525410 times)

IceCold · « **Reply #21775 on:** January 21, 2007, 05:57:40 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on January 21, 2007, 10:25:27 AM

yes, but that doesn't mean that his back is any less good.

dorian's arms have a direct impact on the look of his back.

Ronnie's calves do not.

you overestimated the importance of arms in the back shots.

of course you are. another point for your stupid arguement - by the way - you're really the only one left still delusional about ronnie - everyone else left.

if arms mattered in the back shots as much as you think then levrone, priest, dillet, levrone, nasser, matarazzo, gunter, etc. would have done better in the back comparision poses.

the didnt because they didnt have good backs. it has really nothing to do with arms.

very similar to who has better arms in the abs and thigh poses.

Bear · « **Reply #21776 on:** January 22, 2007, 03:24:48 AM »

Quote from: RocketSwitch625 on January 21, 2007, 04:10:21 PM

Direct from Hulkster's hard drive. He kept in his archive.

Oo clever response. So it is your favourite picture?

Bear · « **Reply #21777 on:** January 22, 2007, 03:38:50 AM »

Quote from: IceCold on January 21, 2007, 05:57:40 PM

if arms mattered in the back shots as much as you think then levrone, priest, dillet, levrone, nasser, matarazzo, gunter, etc. would have done better in the back comparision poses.

the didnt because they didnt have good backs. it has really nothing to do with arms.

Well Ronnie does have a good back so what's your point? They called him the 747, repeatedly affirming that his back was the best of all time. His lats flared out in a way Dorian's never did, with a waist/lat ratio Dorian could only dream of. The arms help, but are not the sole reason for this clear superiority.

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #21778 on:** January 22, 2007, 12:03:51 PM »

Quote from: Bear on January 22, 2007, 03:38:50 AM

Well Ronnie does have a good back so what's your point? They called him the 747, repeatedly affirming that his back was the best of all time. His lats flared out in a way Dorian's never did, with a waist/lat ratio Dorian could only dream of. The arms help, but are not the sole reason for this clear superiority.

Yates is totally destroying Coleman in that comparsion and it's not even contest day for Yates.

Pwned. LOL

RocketSwitch625 · « **Reply #21779 on:** January 22, 2007, 02:21:41 PM »

And the pregnancy STILL continues well after 9 months. HAHAHAHA

pobrecito · « **Reply #21780 on:** January 22, 2007, 03:18:03 PM »

NeoSemen: proof that Nasser was 5'9"

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #21781 on:** January 22, 2007, 03:44:09 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on January 22, 2007, 03:18:03 PM

NeoSemen: proof that Nasser was 5'9"

He does look shorter but it might be the angle?

pobrecito · « **Reply #21782 on:** January 22, 2007, 03:45:48 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 22, 2007, 03:44:09 PM

He does look shorter but it might be the angle?

Nope, Nasser in reality was 5'9" however it was misprinted as him being 5'11. I believe it was the 97 Arnold classic they had him (correctly) listed at 5'9". This picture confirms that.

brian36 · « **Reply #21783 on:** January 22, 2007, 03:58:18 PM »

I keep hearing how Dorian had better balance. How can he have better balance with poor arms combined on a giant torso?

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #21784 on:** January 22, 2007, 03:58:56 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on January 22, 2007, 03:18:03 PM

NeoSemen: proof that Nasser was 5'9"

hey PubicHair, proof that Nasser is 5'11"

pobrecito · « **Reply #21785 on:** January 22, 2007, 03:59:50 PM »

Quote from: brian36 on January 22, 2007, 03:58:18 PM

I keep hearing how Dorian had better balance. How can he have better balance with poor arms combined on a giant torso?

Becuase the torn bi only affected one pose - the front double biceps. Ronnie's oil-inflated, twig calves were a liability in every single pose.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #21786 on:** January 22, 2007, 04:00:25 PM »

Quote from: brian36 on January 22, 2007, 03:58:18 PM

I keep hearing how Dorian had better balance. How can he have better balance with poor arms combined on a giant torso?

poor arms

pobrecito · « **Reply #21787 on:** January 22, 2007, 04:00:48 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on January 22, 2007, 03:58:56 PM

hey PubicHair, proof that Nasser is 5'11"

nope, Nasser is standing closer to the camera

I'm surprised you've even come back in here after the anal raping sucky put on you

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #21788 on:** January 22, 2007, 04:05:28 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on January 22, 2007, 04:00:48 PM

nope, Nasser is standing closer to the camera

likewise, I could say the same about the pic you posted.

Quote

I'm surprised you've even come back in here after the anal raping sucky put on you

you mean the "anal raping" that I easily refuted with common sense? Give me a break!

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #21789 on:** January 22, 2007, 04:11:00 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 22, 2007, 04:00:25 PM

poor arms

yes, poor arms. He had twigs for arms sticking out of a barrel torso.

pobrecito · « **Reply #21790 on:** January 22, 2007, 04:12:58 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on January 22, 2007, 04:05:28 PM

likewise, I could say the same about the pic you posted.

Bullshit. Utter bullshit.

Look at the photo you posted. Shawn looks about 4'11" standing next to Nasser

Plus, you can clearly see Nasser is standing much closer, just look at his left elbow in front of Yates'. Now in the picture I posted, they are all standing in a straight line

Just face it, Nasser was 5'9"

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #21791 on:** January 22, 2007, 04:13:40 PM »

Someone has better balance & proportions in this pic and it isn't Coleman

IceCold · « **Reply #21792 on:** January 22, 2007, 04:14:33 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on January 22, 2007, 04:11:00 PM

yes, poor arms. He had twigs for arms sticking out of a barrel torso.

and your point is......

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #21793 on:** January 22, 2007, 04:17:55 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on January 22, 2007, 04:11:00 PM

yes, poor arms. He had twigs for arms sticking out of a barrel torso.

Twigs

Neo you're found of blanket statements , poor

give me a fucking break , his TRICEPS & FOREARMS are clearly better than Colemans , in terms of density , thickness , and detail and his biceps aren't

much to learn you do

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #21794 on:** January 22, 2007, 04:21:37 PM »

His biceps while NOT the biggest aren't lacking development like Colemans calves , check out the separation of his triceps , Coleman's triceps may be larger but whats the purpose? if they suck

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #21795 on:** January 22, 2007, 04:24:24 PM »

Great balance Ronnie , fantastic how your forearms are in proportion with your overdeveloped biceps/triceps

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #21796 on:** January 22, 2007, 04:25:57 PM »

Great balance in those legs as well Ronnie , hey Ronnie where is your calves? lol 22" arms are 17" calves

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #21797 on:** January 22, 2007, 04:36:40 PM »

Quote from: pobrecito on January 22, 2007, 04:12:58 PM

Bullshit. Utter bullshit.

Look at the photo you posted. Shawn looks about 4'11" standing next to Nasser Plus, you can clearly see Nasser is standing much closer, just look at his left elbow in front of Yates'. Now in the picture I posted, they are all standing in a straight line Just face it, Nasser was 5'9"

wtf does Shawn Ray's height have to do with Nasser? If he looks 4'11" next to Nasser, then guess what? He'll also look 4'11" next to Dorian. You cannot tell how much closer Nasser is standing to the camera, or if he's even standing in front of Dorian at all. Just face it, Nasser is 5'11".

NeoSeminole · « **Reply #21798 on:** January 22, 2007, 04:40:54 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on January 22, 2007, 04:17:55 PM

Twigs Neo you're found of blanket statements , poor give me a fucking break , his TRICEPS & FOREARMS are clearly better than Colemans , in terms of density , thickness , and detail and his biceps aren't

ha ha ha ha, you claim that Dorian's triceps are better than Ronnie's and then you go and post this pic. Look at his back arm for f*ck sakes. It looks 19" max. Better triceps my ass! Ronnie's triceps are larger and have more detail.

Shockwave · « **Reply #21799 on:** January 22, 2007, 04:43:55 PM »

Quote from: NeoSeminole on January 22, 2007, 04:40:54 PM

ha ha ha ha, you claim that Dorian's triceps are better than Ronnie's and then you go and post this pic. Look at his back arm for f*ck sakes. It looks 19" max. Better triceps my ass! Ronnie's triceps are larger and have more detail.

Doesn't Dorian weigh in the 270 lb area for this pic?