but the sum of ronnie's parts are better because they are more shapely, have better detail (on the whole) and are put together in a much more pleasing (aesthetic) manner.
I mean, seriously:
Ronnie was much more impressive overall thanks to his full muscle bellies, shape and detail.
dorian looked more like a power lifter than a bodybuilder.
You've probably clung to the most muscular pose for the past 100 pages lol is that all you have? and spare me you ignorant logic , Ronnie is aesthetic? thats a myth he never made the top 20 most aesthetic physiques list why? maybe because he's NO Flex Wheeler

a man who Dorian beat every single time they faced , in fact Dorian almost beat half the guys on the aesthetics list lol
better detail ? still clinging to that one huh? Ronnie doesn't have better detail in his back , calves , midsection , triceps , where is the better OVERALL detail? an empty blanket statement
Stop judging them on your personal preferences , please do so according to the criteria , oh wait you tried that and got your ass handed to you lol
Ronnie loses to Dorian in balanced development , density , and conditioning and depending on the year bulk too , you're like these guys who think because Ronnie ' looks ' better in poses that he is better in the poses , there is other criteria than a nice taper , big arms and an ' x-frame '
And stop judging Dorian based on Ronnie's strengths , they don't apply to Dorian , he doesn't have to beat Ronnie at his game to beat Ronnie , he doesn't have to have bigger biceps , bigger quads , better delt-pec tie-ins , all he has to do is be Dorian Yates at his best and based on that combo its very safe to assume Yates wouldn't lose.