you have very poor comprehension skills, you skew everything everyone says and miss the logic of almost every post.
peter could be wrong about ronnies back-yes, and his weight-yes but he could also be wrong about the assesments of dorian-yes if you accept that peter is always right, as you do with his dorian assesments then you'd have to agree that ronnie had the best back. however, peter can and does make mistakes thus making his opinions on dorian and ronnie open for criticism and pointless in the debate. if you accept he is right about dorian, why not conclude he is right about ronnies back? what is the dividing line, you cant and dont know thus showing the lack of cred that should be given to statements and opinions. they are open to bias, bad perception, mood, context, relationship. the pictures are the most objective way to argue this point, they are not subjective like opinions.
you cant pick and choose what statements to accept. like lee stating one thing about dorian and then recently saying ronnie is the best etc.. they are subjective and are the worst type of evidence.
NEO i would hold your breath for an answer as to how to measure water levels, they avoid the question because they know that based on the criteria for conditioning ronnie wins. being dry isnt a criteria, dryness creates seperation, cuts and striations nothign else.
You still here? lol I'm surprised
Let me simplify this for you because you are simple , opinions are subjective and for all intents & purposes the only opinions that matter are the judges so its a matter of authority who's opinion I'm more winning to believe , yours , Neos , Hulksters , who is basing their opinions on bias , preference and pictures and videos or a well established authority in the bodybuilding community who was live an in person and you will lose every time
you cant pick and choose what statements to accept. like lee stating one thing about dorian and then recently saying ronnie is the best etc.. they are subjective and are the worst type of evidence.
I don't have to pick and choose I only have one quote on the topic , and the quote was from a time when Ronnie looked much better than he does now , and it directly addresses the topic at hand , who would beat whom at their respective bests and Lee flat out said Dorian would beat Ronnie 1998/1999 with ease and you said Priest says Ronnie's the best thats your claim you never posted the quote or the magazine it was from , and I'm not willing to take your account on it , you've been proven biased already I always post the magazine , month , date and the quote so people can check on my claims if they don't take my word for it
NEO i would hold your breath for an answer as to how to measure water levels, they avoid the question because they know that based on the criteria for conditioning ronnie wins. being dry isnt a criteria, dryness creates seperation, cuts and striations nothign else.
Ronnie does NOT win in terms of conditioning thats a fallacy , he may have come close in 98/01 but to say he wins is garbage , and being dry isn't a criteria but its the same as being defined , how does one get their muscles defined? by removing their bodies of water I.E. being DRY and fat I.E being HARD when a bodybuilder is off they say he was soft & holding water his conditioning was off , one can still have defined muscles and be holding water , one can have separated muscles and still be soft , know this , learn this.
